Paper · 2012 · Proceedings of the Latvian Academy of Sciences Section B Natural Exact and Applied Sciences

Effect of Humic Substances on Nutrient Status and Yield of Onion (Allium Cepa L.) in Field Conditions

Anita Osvalde; Andis Karlsons; Gunta Čekstere; et al.

4
claims
8
verbatim quotes
9
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Humic substances (HS) extracted from various organic materials have been shown to stimulate plant growth. However, scarce information is available on the impact of different methods of application of HS on nutrient status of vegetable species, especially in soil and climate conditions of the temperate zone. The goal of the present study was to evaluate the effect of pre-plant (bulblet soaking) and foliar application of commercially-produced peat and vermicompost-derived HS preparations on nutrient status and yield of onion (Allium cepa L.) in field experiments using two farming systems - conventional and organic. Although the effect was variable between nutrients, dependent on timing, application methods and farming systems, pre-plant and foliar HS tested was hardly effective in preventing nutrient (S, Zn, B) deficiencies limiting onion yield. Moreover, HS induced changes that significantly reduced nutrient status of organically grown onion and had detrimental effect on yield. Although one-year results did not suggest a benefit from HS application, further studies are necessary to evaluate the possible effectiveness of peat and vermicompost extracts on onion production in Latvia.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Preplant and foliar humic substances were hardly effective in preventing nutrient deficiencies limiting onion yield.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Treatment
pre-plant and foliar HSe0
Outcome
nutrient (S, Zn, B) deficiencies limiting onion yielde0
Direction
hardly effectivee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Onion (Allium Cepa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–81 · show in text ↑
e0

“pre-plant and foliar HS tested was hardly effective in preventing nutrient (S, Zn, B) deficiencies limiting onion yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 735–854 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Humic substances significantly reduced nutrient status of organically grown onion.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae0
Treatment
HSe0
Outcome
nutrient status of organically grown onione0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Onion (Allium Cepa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–81 · show in text ↑
e0

“HS induced changes that significantly reduced nutrient status of organically grown onion and had detrimental effect on yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 866–990 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Humic substances detrimentally affected onion yield.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae0
Treatment
HSe0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
detrimentale0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Onion (Allium Cepa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–81 · show in text ↑
e0

“HS induced changes that significantly reduced nutrient status of organically grown onion and had detrimental effect on yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 866–990 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors call for further study of peat and vermicompost extracts for onion production in Latvia.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae0
Outcome
further studies are necessary to evaluate the possible effectiveness of peat and vermicompost extractse0
Setting
Latviae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Onion (Allium Cepa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–81 · show in text ↑
e0

“further studies are necessary to evaluate the possible effectiveness of peat and vermicompost extracts on onion production in Latvia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1065–1197 · show in text ↑

other · nutrient: content · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 10 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

other · yield · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

48 papers: 44 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 44 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

44 papers more in this group

See all 48 papers →

application · yield · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

131 papers: 121 positive, 10 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 121 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

127 papers more in this group

See all 131 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.