Paper · 2023 · International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences

Integrated Nutrient Management on Growth and Yield of Kharif Onion (Allium cepa L.)

R. S. Wabalepatil; D. A. Sonawane; D. D. Sawale

13
claims
26
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

The field investigation was conducted in kharif- 2021 at Agronomy farm, B – Division, Plot No – 5, College of Agriculture, Pune with ten treatments and three replications in RBD. The application of 75% RDF + 1% foliar spray of 19:19:19 at 30 DAT + Azospirillum + PSB &KSB was the significant treatment regarding plant height (69.98 cm), neck thickness (1.68 cm), number of leaves plant-1 (11.40), dry matter plant-1 (26.26 g), days to maturity (142.33), polar and equatorial diameter (6.70 and 6.93cm), number of scales bulb-1 (11.74), fresh weight bulb-1 (157.57 g), yield (300.21 q ha-1) and quality(57.28 %) A grade bulbs. Furthermore, net gain was (17.47, 15.33 and 26.14 N, P and K kg ha-1), microbial count of Azospirillum, PSB and KSB was (39.17, 33.56 cfu and 33.31 cfu x 107 g-1) and maximum B: C ratio (3.35) was recorded.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The specified integrated nutrient treatment was significant for plant height (69.98 cm).

Taxon
OnionAllium cepat0
Treatment
75% RDF + 1% foliar spray of 19:19:19 at 30 DAT + Azospirillum + PSB &KSBe0
Interactor
AzospirillumAzospirillume0symbiont
Outcome
plant heighte0
Value
69.98 cme0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azospirillum
Azospirillum · InteractorFadelblaid · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The application of 75% RDF + 1% foliar spray of 19:19:19 at 30 DAT + Azospirillum + PSB &KSB was the significant treatment regarding plant height (69.98 cm), neck thickness (1.68 cm), number of leaves plant-1 (11.40), dry matter plant-1 (26.26 g), days to maturity (142.33), polar and equatorial diameter (6.70 and 6.93cm), number of scales bulb-1 (11.74), fresh weight bulb-1 (157.57 g), yield (300.21 q ha-1) and quality(57.28 %) A grade bulbs.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 179–625 · show in text ↑
t0

“Onion (Allium cepa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–83 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The specified integrated nutrient treatment was significant for neck thickness (1.68 cm).

Taxon
OnionAllium cepat0
Treatment
75% RDF + 1% foliar spray of 19:19:19 at 30 DAT + Azospirillum + PSB &KSBe0
Interactor
AzospirillumAzospirillume0symbiont
Outcome
neck thicknesse0
Value
1.68 cme0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azospirillum
Azospirillum · InteractorFadelblaid · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The application of 75% RDF + 1% foliar spray of 19:19:19 at 30 DAT + Azospirillum + PSB &KSB was the significant treatment regarding plant height (69.98 cm), neck thickness (1.68 cm), number of leaves plant-1 (11.40), dry matter plant-1 (26.26 g), days to maturity (142.33), polar and equatorial diameter (6.70 and 6.93cm), number of scales bulb-1 (11.74), fresh weight bulb-1 (157.57 g), yield (300.21 q ha-1) and quality(57.28 %) A grade bulbs.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 179–625 · show in text ↑
t0

“Onion (Allium cepa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–83 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The specified integrated nutrient treatment was significant for number of leaves plant-1 (11.40).

Taxon
OnionAllium cepat0
Treatment
75% RDF + 1% foliar spray of 19:19:19 at 30 DAT + Azospirillum + PSB &KSBe0
Interactor
AzospirillumAzospirillume0symbiont
Outcome
number of leaves plant-1e0
Value
11.40e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azospirillum
Azospirillum · InteractorFadelblaid · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The application of 75% RDF + 1% foliar spray of 19:19:19 at 30 DAT + Azospirillum + PSB &KSB was the significant treatment regarding plant height (69.98 cm), neck thickness (1.68 cm), number of leaves plant-1 (11.40), dry matter plant-1 (26.26 g), days to maturity (142.33), polar and equatorial diameter (6.70 and 6.93cm), number of scales bulb-1 (11.74), fresh weight bulb-1 (157.57 g), yield (300.21 q ha-1) and quality(57.28 %) A grade bulbs.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 179–625 · show in text ↑
t0

“Onion (Allium cepa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–83 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The specified integrated nutrient treatment was significant for dry matter plant-1 (26.26 g).

Taxon
OnionAllium cepat0
Treatment
75% RDF + 1% foliar spray of 19:19:19 at 30 DAT + Azospirillum + PSB &KSBe0
Interactor
AzospirillumAzospirillume0symbiont
Outcome
dry matter plant-1e0
Value
26.26 ge0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azospirillum
Azospirillum · InteractorFadelblaid · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The application of 75% RDF + 1% foliar spray of 19:19:19 at 30 DAT + Azospirillum + PSB &KSB was the significant treatment regarding plant height (69.98 cm), neck thickness (1.68 cm), number of leaves plant-1 (11.40), dry matter plant-1 (26.26 g), days to maturity (142.33), polar and equatorial diameter (6.70 and 6.93cm), number of scales bulb-1 (11.74), fresh weight bulb-1 (157.57 g), yield (300.21 q ha-1) and quality(57.28 %) A grade bulbs.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 179–625 · show in text ↑
t0

“Onion (Allium cepa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–83 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The specified integrated nutrient treatment was significant for days to maturity (142.33).

Taxon
OnionAllium cepat0
Treatment
75% RDF + 1% foliar spray of 19:19:19 at 30 DAT + Azospirillum + PSB &KSBe0
Interactor
AzospirillumAzospirillume0symbiont
Outcome
days to maturitye0
Value
142.33e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azospirillum
Azospirillum · InteractorFadelblaid · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The application of 75% RDF + 1% foliar spray of 19:19:19 at 30 DAT + Azospirillum + PSB &KSB was the significant treatment regarding plant height (69.98 cm), neck thickness (1.68 cm), number of leaves plant-1 (11.40), dry matter plant-1 (26.26 g), days to maturity (142.33), polar and equatorial diameter (6.70 and 6.93cm), number of scales bulb-1 (11.74), fresh weight bulb-1 (157.57 g), yield (300.21 q ha-1) and quality(57.28 %) A grade bulbs.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 179–625 · show in text ↑
t0

“Onion (Allium cepa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–83 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The specified integrated nutrient treatment was significant for polar and equatorial diameter (6.70 and 6.93cm).

Taxon
OnionAllium cepat0
Treatment
75% RDF + 1% foliar spray of 19:19:19 at 30 DAT + Azospirillum + PSB &KSBe0
Interactor
AzospirillumAzospirillume0symbiont
Outcome
polar and equatorial diametere0
Value
6.70 and 6.93cme0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azospirillum
Azospirillum · InteractorFadelblaid · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The application of 75% RDF + 1% foliar spray of 19:19:19 at 30 DAT + Azospirillum + PSB &KSB was the significant treatment regarding plant height (69.98 cm), neck thickness (1.68 cm), number of leaves plant-1 (11.40), dry matter plant-1 (26.26 g), days to maturity (142.33), polar and equatorial diameter (6.70 and 6.93cm), number of scales bulb-1 (11.74), fresh weight bulb-1 (157.57 g), yield (300.21 q ha-1) and quality(57.28 %) A grade bulbs.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 179–625 · show in text ↑
t0

“Onion (Allium cepa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–83 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The specified integrated nutrient treatment was significant for number of scales bulb-1 (11.74).

Taxon
OnionAllium cepat0
Treatment
75% RDF + 1% foliar spray of 19:19:19 at 30 DAT + Azospirillum + PSB &KSBe0
Interactor
AzospirillumAzospirillume0symbiont
Outcome
number of scales bulb-1e0
Value
11.74e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azospirillum
Azospirillum · InteractorFadelblaid · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The application of 75% RDF + 1% foliar spray of 19:19:19 at 30 DAT + Azospirillum + PSB &KSB was the significant treatment regarding plant height (69.98 cm), neck thickness (1.68 cm), number of leaves plant-1 (11.40), dry matter plant-1 (26.26 g), days to maturity (142.33), polar and equatorial diameter (6.70 and 6.93cm), number of scales bulb-1 (11.74), fresh weight bulb-1 (157.57 g), yield (300.21 q ha-1) and quality(57.28 %) A grade bulbs.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 179–625 · show in text ↑
t0

“Onion (Allium cepa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–83 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The specified integrated nutrient treatment was significant for fresh weight bulb-1 (157.57 g).

Taxon
OnionAllium cepat0
Treatment
75% RDF + 1% foliar spray of 19:19:19 at 30 DAT + Azospirillum + PSB &KSBe0
Interactor
AzospirillumAzospirillume0symbiont
Outcome
fresh weight bulb-1e0
Value
157.57 ge0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azospirillum
Azospirillum · InteractorFadelblaid · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The application of 75% RDF + 1% foliar spray of 19:19:19 at 30 DAT + Azospirillum + PSB &KSB was the significant treatment regarding plant height (69.98 cm), neck thickness (1.68 cm), number of leaves plant-1 (11.40), dry matter plant-1 (26.26 g), days to maturity (142.33), polar and equatorial diameter (6.70 and 6.93cm), number of scales bulb-1 (11.74), fresh weight bulb-1 (157.57 g), yield (300.21 q ha-1) and quality(57.28 %) A grade bulbs.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 179–625 · show in text ↑
t0

“Onion (Allium cepa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–83 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The specified integrated nutrient treatment was significant for yield (300.21 q ha-1).

Taxon
OnionAllium cepat0
Treatment
75% RDF + 1% foliar spray of 19:19:19 at 30 DAT + Azospirillum + PSB &KSBe0
Interactor
AzospirillumAzospirillume0symbiont
Outcome
yielde0
Value
300.21 q ha-1e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azospirillum
Azospirillum · InteractorFadelblaid · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The application of 75% RDF + 1% foliar spray of 19:19:19 at 30 DAT + Azospirillum + PSB &KSB was the significant treatment regarding plant height (69.98 cm), neck thickness (1.68 cm), number of leaves plant-1 (11.40), dry matter plant-1 (26.26 g), days to maturity (142.33), polar and equatorial diameter (6.70 and 6.93cm), number of scales bulb-1 (11.74), fresh weight bulb-1 (157.57 g), yield (300.21 q ha-1) and quality(57.28 %) A grade bulbs.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 179–625 · show in text ↑
t0

“Onion (Allium cepa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–83 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The specified integrated nutrient treatment was significant for quality (57.28 %).

Taxon
OnionAllium cepat0
Treatment
75% RDF + 1% foliar spray of 19:19:19 at 30 DAT + Azospirillum + PSB &KSBe0
Interactor
AzospirillumAzospirillume0symbiont
Outcome
qualitye0
Value
57.28 %e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azospirillum
Azospirillum · InteractorFadelblaid · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The application of 75% RDF + 1% foliar spray of 19:19:19 at 30 DAT + Azospirillum + PSB &KSB was the significant treatment regarding plant height (69.98 cm), neck thickness (1.68 cm), number of leaves plant-1 (11.40), dry matter plant-1 (26.26 g), days to maturity (142.33), polar and equatorial diameter (6.70 and 6.93cm), number of scales bulb-1 (11.74), fresh weight bulb-1 (157.57 g), yield (300.21 q ha-1) and quality(57.28 %) A grade bulbs.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 179–625 · show in text ↑
t0

“Onion (Allium cepa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–83 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Net gains in N, P and K were reported for the treatment.

Taxon
OnionAllium cepat0
Outcome
net gaine0
Value
17.47, 15.33 and 26.14 N, P and K kg ha-1e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“net gain was (17.47, 15.33 and 26.14 N, P and K kg ha-1), microbial count of Azospirillum, PSB and KSB was (39.17, 33.56 cfu and 33.31 cfu x 107 g-1) and maximum B: C ratio (3.35) was recorded”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 639–831 · show in text ↑
t0

“Onion (Allium cepa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–83 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Counts of Azospirillum, PSB and KSB were reported.

Taxon
OnionAllium cepat0
Interactor
AzospirillumAzospirillume0symbiont
Outcome
microbial count of Azospirillum, PSB and KSBe0
Value
39.17, 33.56 cfu and 33.31 cfu x 107 g-1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azospirillum
Azospirillum · InteractorFadelblaid · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“net gain was (17.47, 15.33 and 26.14 N, P and K kg ha-1), microbial count of Azospirillum, PSB and KSB was (39.17, 33.56 cfu and 33.31 cfu x 107 g-1) and maximum B: C ratio (3.35) was recorded”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 639–831 · show in text ↑
t0

“Onion (Allium cepa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–83 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The maximum benefit-cost ratio was 3.35.

Taxon
OnionAllium cepat0
Outcome
B: C ratioe0
Direction
maximume0
Value
3.35e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“net gain was (17.47, 15.33 and 26.14 N, P and K kg ha-1), microbial count of Azospirillum, PSB and KSB was (39.17, 33.56 cfu and 33.31 cfu x 107 g-1) and maximum B: C ratio (3.35) was recorded”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 639–831 · show in text ↑
t0

“Onion (Allium cepa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–83 · show in text ↑

Azospirillum · phenology · Allium cepa (onion)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Azospirillum · quality: general · Allium cepa (onion)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Azospirillum · growth · Allium cepa (onion)Results agree

15 papers: 15 positive, 0 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

Azospirillum · yield · Allium cepa (onion)Results agree

24 papers: 24 positive, 0 negative or no effect

23 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

20 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

fertilization · phenology · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 12 positive, 2 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

application · quality: general · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

19 papers: 18 positive, 1 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

fertilization · quality: general · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

32 papers: 27 positive, 5 negative or no effect

26 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

28 papers more in this group

See all 32 papers →

application · growth · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

74 papers: 70 positive, 4 negative or no effect

69 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

70 papers more in this group

See all 74 papers →

8 of 12 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.