Paper · 2018 · International Journal of Chemical Studies

Glyphosate selectivity by non-transgenic methods and efficacy of weed control in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L)

K. Sankaranarayanan; Prakash Ah; K. Rajendran

8
claims
19
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Glyphosate is a non-selective, broad spectrum and systemic weedicide and cannot be sprayed directly on crop without protective mechanism. Application of glyphosate at early stage of weed growth requires minimal dose. Higher dose also could be used by employing protective mechanism to crop plants. Glyphosate phytotoxicity could be reduced by pre-conditioning of plants by chemicals. Keeping the above facts in view, this experiment this experiment was conducted during 2013-14 at Central Institute for Cotton Research, Coimbatore with objective to assess glyphosate based weed control in cotton by achieving crop selectivity for glyphosate. Higher rate of crop phytotoxicity grade of 2.5 and 2.0 were registered by application of 2.5 ml/L of glyphosate along with 0.625 ml/L of Quizalofop ethyl at 20 and 40 DAS without protective mechanism (T6). The same treatment, with pre conditioned application of NiCl @0.01% on crop plants two days before application of glyphosate combination observed less phytotoxicity grade of 1.25 for both 20 and 40 DAS (T8). The significantly least weed DMP was estimated with application of glyphosate @ 5 ml/L at 20 and 40 DAS with protective mechanism(T9). Manual weeding at 20 and 40 DAS (T2) had registered significantly the highest seed cotton yield (2087kg/ha). The results was on par with application of glyphosate @ 5 ml/L at 20 and 40 DAS with protective mechanism (T9) and also comparable with glyphosate @ 2.5 ml/L with 0.625 ml/L of quizalofop ethyl at 20 and 40 DAS with protective mechanism/ pre conditioned by application of NiCl on crop plants ( T7 & T8). Application of Glyphosate @5.0 ml/L at 20 & 40 DAS with protective mechanism registered the significantly highest net return (Rs. 61, 875/ ha) and benefit cost ratio (2.56).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pre-conditioning cotton with NiCl reduced phytotoxicity of the glyphosate and quizalofop combination to grade 1.25 at 20 and 40 DAS, compared with no protection.

Taxon
Gossypium hirsutumGossypium hirsutumt0
Treatment
pre conditioned application of NiCl @0.01% on crop plantse2
Outcome
phytotoxicity gradee2
Direction
lesse2
Value
1.25e2
Comparator
without protective mechanisme1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Higher rate of crop phytotoxicity grade of 2.5 and 2.0 were registered by application of 2.5 ml/L of glyphosate along with 0.625 ml/L of Quizalofop ethyl at 20 and 40 DAS without protective mechanism (T6)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 642–846 · show in text ↑
e2

“The same treatment, with pre conditioned application of NiCl @0.01% on crop plants two days before application of glyphosate combination observed less phytotoxicity grade of 1.25 for both 20 and 40 DAS (T8)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 848–1054 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–110 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glyphosate with quizalofop at 2.5 and 0.625 ml/L without protection caused phytotoxicity grades of 2.5 and 2.0 at 20 and 40 DAS in cotton.

Taxon
Gossypium hirsutumGossypium hirsutumt0
Treatment
2.5 ml/L of glyphosate along with 0.625 ml/L of Quizalofop ethyle1
Outcome
phytotoxicity gradee1
Direction
Higher ratee1
Value
2.5 and 2.0e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Higher rate of crop phytotoxicity grade of 2.5 and 2.0 were registered by application of 2.5 ml/L of glyphosate along with 0.625 ml/L of Quizalofop ethyl at 20 and 40 DAS without protective mechanism (T6)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 642–846 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Glyphosate at 5 ml/L with protection at 20 and 40 DAS gave the least weed dry matter production in cotton.

Taxon
Gossypium hirsutumGossypium hirsutumt0
Treatment
glyphosate @ 5 ml/L at 20 and 40 DAS with protective mechanisme3
Interactor
weede3weed
Outcome
weed DMPe3
Direction
leaste3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“The significantly least weed DMP was estimated with application of glyphosate @ 5 ml/L at 20 and 40 DAS with protective mechanism(T9)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1056–1189 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Manual weeding at 20 and 40 DAS gave the highest seed cotton yield, 2087 kg/ha.

Taxon
Gossypium hirsutumGossypium hirsutumt0
Treatment
Manual weeding at 20 and 40 DASe4
Outcome
seed cotton yielde4
Direction
higheste4
Value
2087kg/hae4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“Manual weeding at 20 and 40 DAS (T2) had registered significantly the highest seed cotton yield (2087kg/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1191–1298 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glyphosate at 5 ml/L with protection gave seed cotton yield on par with manual weeding.

Taxon
Gossypium hirsutumGossypium hirsutumt0
Treatment
glyphosate @ 5 ml/L at 20 and 40 DAS with protective mechanism (T9)e5
Outcome
seed cotton yielde4
Direction
on pare5
Comparator
Manual weeding at 20 and 40 DAS (T2)e4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“The results was on par with application of glyphosate @ 5 ml/L at 20 and 40 DAS with protective mechanism (T9)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1300–1410 · show in text ↑
e4

“Manual weeding at 20 and 40 DAS (T2) had registered significantly the highest seed cotton yield (2087kg/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1191–1298 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glyphosate at 2.5 ml/L with quizalofop gave seed cotton yield comparable to manual weeding.

Taxon
Gossypium hirsutumGossypium hirsutumt0
Treatment
glyphosate @ 2.5 ml/L with 0.625 ml/L of quizalofop ethyle5
Outcome
seed cotton yielde4
Direction
comparablee5
Comparator
Manual weeding at 20 and 40 DAS (T2)e4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“and also comparable with glyphosate @ 2.5 ml/L with 0.625 ml/L of quizalofop ethyl at 20 and 40 DAS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1411–1510 · show in text ↑
e4

“Manual weeding at 20 and 40 DAS (T2) had registered significantly the highest seed cotton yield (2087kg/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1191–1298 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Glyphosate at 5.0 ml/L with protection gave the highest net return, Rs. 61,875/ha.

Taxon
Gossypium hirsutumGossypium hirsutumt0
Treatment
Glyphosate @5.0 ml/L at 20 & 40 DAS with protective mechanisme6
Outcome
net returne6
Direction
higheste6
Value
Rs. 61, 875/ hae6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“Application of Glyphosate @5.0 ml/L at 20 & 40 DAS with protective mechanism registered the significantly highest net return (Rs. 61, 875/ ha) and benefit cost ratio (2.56)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1604–1776 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glyphosate at 5.0 ml/L with protection gave the highest benefit cost ratio, 2.56.

Taxon
Gossypium hirsutumGossypium hirsutumt0
Treatment
Glyphosate @5.0 ml/L at 20 & 40 DAS with protective mechanisme6
Outcome
benefit cost ratioe6
Direction
higheste6
Value
2.56e6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“Application of Glyphosate @5.0 ml/L at 20 & 40 DAS with protective mechanism registered the significantly highest net return (Rs. 61, 875/ ha) and benefit cost ratio (2.56)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1604–1776 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–110 · show in text ↑

glyphosate · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results differ

61 papers: 35 positive, 26 negative or no effect

34 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

57 papers more in this group

See all 61 papers →

quizalofop-ethyl · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 7 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

glyphosate · weed · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

37 papers: 31 positive, 6 negative or no effect

30 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

33 papers more in this group

See all 37 papers →

herbicide · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

182 papers: 123 positive, 59 negative or no effect

122 papers in the same direction as this paper · 51 in the opposite direction · 8 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

178 papers more in this group

See all 182 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.