Paper · 2023 · Journal of the Saudi Society of Agricultural Sciences

Conventional vs. nano-micronutrients as foliar fertilization for enhancing the quality and nutritional status of pomegranate fruits

Azza S. Hussein; Amany H.A. Abeed; Adel R.A. Usman; et al.

6
claims
8
verbatim quotes
32
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Currently, nanotechnology is widely used in agriculture and horticulture. Nanofertilizers are essential for encouraging vegetative growth and flowering, as well as enhancing productivity and fruit quality. These nanoparticles are viewed as growth promoters as well. The current study was therefore carried out during the two successive seasons of 2021 and 2022 on 14-year-old trees grown in clay soil in a field experiment at the Pomology Department Research orchard, Faculty of Agriculture, Assiut University, Egypt. The effects of conventional vs. nano-micronutrients as foliar fertilizers on the fruit yield, quality, and mineral nutrition status of pomegranate trees were studied. The foliar application of all treatments on pomegranate trees remarkably increased yield and physical properties of fruits as well as improved the levels of total soluble solids percentage, anthocyanin pigment, flavonol, total phenols, antioxidant activity and nutrients status compared with the controls during the 2021 and 2022 seasons. The lowest fruit cracking percentages were obtained by the spraying of nano-micronutrients (4.33-5.70 %) compared with the other treatments and the control, which gave the highest percentages (10.45-11.43 %). The highest increments in yield, physical properties of fruits and levels of total soluble solids percentage, anthocyanin pigment, flavonol, total phenols, and antioxidant activity were noticed by the spraying of nano-micronutrients especially at 1000 and/or 1500 µg mL-1. It could be concluded that the use of nanofoliar fertilization in pomegranate cultivation may improve the yield, quality, and nutritional status of pomegranate fruits.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar application of all treatments increased yield and physical properties of pomegranate fruits compared with the controls.

Taxon
pomegranatePunica granatume0
Treatment
foliar application of all treatmentse0
Outcome
yield and physical properties of fruitse0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
controlse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The foliar application of all treatments on pomegranate trees remarkably increased yield and physical properties of fruits as well as improved the levels of total soluble solids percentage, anthocyanin pigment, flavonol, total phenols, antioxidant activity and nutrients status compared with the controls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 685–989 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar treatments improved total soluble solids percentage, anthocyanin pigment and flavonol of pomegranate fruits compared with the controls.

Taxon
pomegranatePunica granatume0
Treatment
foliar application of all treatmentse0
Outcome
total soluble solids percentage, anthocyanin pigment, flavonole0
Direction
improvede0
Comparator
controlse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The foliar application of all treatments on pomegranate trees remarkably increased yield and physical properties of fruits as well as improved the levels of total soluble solids percentage, anthocyanin pigment, flavonol, total phenols, antioxidant activity and nutrients status compared with the controls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 685–989 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar treatments improved total phenols, antioxidant activity and nutrients status compared with the controls.

Taxon
pomegranatePunica granatume0
Treatment
foliar application of all treatmentse0
Outcome
total phenols, antioxidant activity and nutrients statuse0
Direction
improvede0
Comparator
controlse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The foliar application of all treatments on pomegranate trees remarkably increased yield and physical properties of fruits as well as improved the levels of total soluble solids percentage, anthocyanin pigment, flavonol, total phenols, antioxidant activity and nutrients status compared with the controls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 685–989 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spraying nano-micronutrients gave the lowest fruit cracking percentages (4.33-5.70 %), compared with 10.45-11.43 % in the control.

Taxon
pomegranatePunica granatumt0
Treatment
spraying of nano-micronutrientse0
Outcome
fruit cracking percentagese0
Direction
loweste0
Value
4.33-5.70 %e0
Qualifier
10.45-11.43 %e0
Comparator
the other treatments and the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The lowest fruit cracking percentages were obtained by the spraying of nano-micronutrients (4.33-5.70 %) compared with the other treatments and the control, which gave the highest percentages (10.45-11.43 %)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1024–1231 · show in text ↑
t0

“pomegranate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 113–124 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest increments in yield, fruit physical properties and quality and antioxidant measures came from spraying nano-micronutrients, especially at 1000 and/or 1500 ug/mL.

Taxon
pomegranatePunica granatumt0
Treatment
spraying of nano-micronutrients especially at 1000 and/or 1500 µg mL-1e0
Outcome
increments in yield, physical properties of fruits and levels of total soluble solids percentage, anthocyanin pigment, flavonol, total phenols, and antioxidant activitye0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest increments in yield, physical properties of fruits and levels of total soluble solids percentage, anthocyanin pigment, flavonol, total phenols, and antioxidant activity were noticed by the spraying of nano-micronutrients especially at 1000 and/or 1500 µg mL-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1233–1504 · show in text ↑
t0

“pomegranate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 113–124 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that nanofoliar fertilization in pomegranate cultivation may improve yield, quality and nutritional status of fruits.

Taxon
pomegranatePunica granatume0
Outcome
yield, quality, and nutritional status of pomegranate fruitse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the use of nanofoliar fertilization in pomegranate cultivation may improve the yield, quality, and nutritional status of pomegranate fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1533–1672 · show in text ↑

application · quality: phytochemicals · Punica granatum (pomegranate)Positive and negative results

22 papers: 17 positive, 5 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

application · yield · Punica granatum (pomegranate)Positive and negative results

48 papers: 47 positive, 1 negative or no effect

46 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

44 papers more in this group

See all 48 papers →

nanoparticle · physiology: pigments · Punica granatum (pomegranate)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

application · physiology: pigments · Punica granatum (pomegranate)Results agree

14 papers: 14 positive, 0 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.