Paper · 2021 · Frontiers in Plant Science

Physiological Disorders and Fruit Quality Attributes in Pomegranate: Effects of Meteorological Parameters, Canopy Position and Acetylsalicylic Acid Foliar Sprays

Pavlina Drogoudi; Georgios E. Pantelidis; Stavroula A. Vekiari

12
claims
22
verbatim quotes
19
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Meteorological parameters and occurrences of cracking (CR), russeting (RS), and sun scald (SS) symptoms were monitored in a pomegranate cv. "Wonderful" orchard planted in a W-E orientation, during a 3-year study. Moreover, the efficacy of preharvest foliar sprays with acetylsalicylic acid (ASA; 0.5 mM or 1.0 mM), applied biweekly four to six times, on yield and fruit quality attributes were evaluated in a 2-year study. Fruit from the N-side of the canopy had greater CR and RS, whereas SS symptoms were lower, compared with the S-exposed part of the canopy. The N-side of the canopy had also substantially lower fruit number and yield, suggesting for an important role of light on bisexual flower formation and/or fruit set. Following the occurrences in CR and RS during the fruit maturation period, it was found that temperature fluctuation was the main cause. The presence of RS damages may also be related with increased relative humidity and water movement as symptoms were higher in years with higher values, in the N-side of the canopy and often occurred in the exposed and stylar end of the fruit. The ASA treatment substantially reduced RS by up to 57%, improved the peel red coloration, while anthocyanin, antioxidant capacity, and soluble solid contents in juice were higher. Foliar sprays with ASA did not affect yield, but induced a trend of bigger-sized fruit. In conclusion, planting in a N-S row orientation and selecting an orchard plantation site with a minimum temperature fluctuation and low relative humidity during the fruit-ripening period are measures to control CR and RS in pomegranate. ASA foliar applications proved to have beneficial effects on juice antioxidant contents, but more importantly on fruit appearance.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

North canopy fruit had greater CR and RS than south canopy fruit.

Taxon
pomegranatePunica granatumt0
Outcome
CR and RSe0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
S-exposed part of the canopye0
Setting
N-side of the canopye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fruit from the N-side of the canopy had greater CR and RS, whereas SS symptoms were lower, compared with the S-exposed part of the canopy”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 423–560 · show in text ↑
t0

“pomegranate”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 56–67 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

North canopy fruit had lower SS symptoms than south canopy fruit.

Taxon
pomegranatePunica granatumt0
Outcome
SS symptomse0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
S-exposed part of the canopye0
Setting
N-side of the canopye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fruit from the N-side of the canopy had greater CR and RS, whereas SS symptoms were lower, compared with the S-exposed part of the canopy”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 423–560 · show in text ↑
t0

“pomegranate”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 56–67 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

North canopy fruit number and yield were substantially lower.

Taxon
pomegranatePunica granatumt0
Outcome
fruit number and yielde0
Direction
lowere0
Setting
N-side of the canopye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The N-side of the canopy had also substantially lower fruit number and yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 562–638 · show in text ↑
t0

“pomegranate”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 56–67 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Temperature fluctuation was identified as the main cause of cracking and russeting.

Taxon
pomegranatePunica granatumt0
Outcome
main causee0
Qualifier
temperature fluctuatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“temperature fluctuation was the main cause”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 822–864 · show in text ↑
t0

“pomegranate”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 56–67 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Russeting may relate to higher humidity and water movement.

Taxon
pomegranatePunica granatumt0
Outcome
RS damagese0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
increased relative humidity and water movemente0
Setting
years with higher valuese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“RS damages may also be related with increased relative humidity and water movement as symptoms were higher in years with higher values”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 882–1016 · show in text ↑
t0

“pomegranate”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 56–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ASA reduced RS.

Taxon
pomegranatePunica granatumt0
Treatment
ASA treatmente0
Outcome
RSe0
Direction
reducede0
Value
up to 57%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The ASA treatment substantially reduced RS by up to 57%, improved the peel red coloration, while anthocyanin, antioxidant capacity, and soluble solid contents in juice were higher”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1109–1288 · show in text ↑
t0

“pomegranate”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 56–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ASA improved peel red coloration.

Taxon
pomegranatePunica granatumt0
Treatment
ASA treatmente0
Outcome
peel red coloratione0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The ASA treatment substantially reduced RS by up to 57%, improved the peel red coloration, while anthocyanin, antioxidant capacity, and soluble solid contents in juice were higher”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1109–1288 · show in text ↑
t0

“pomegranate”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 56–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ASA higher anthocyanin, antioxidant capacity, and soluble solid contents in juice.

Taxon
pomegranatePunica granatumt0
Treatment
ASA treatmente0
Outcome
anthocyanin, antioxidant capacity, and soluble solid contents in juicee0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The ASA treatment substantially reduced RS by up to 57%, improved the peel red coloration, while anthocyanin, antioxidant capacity, and soluble solid contents in juice were higher”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1109–1288 · show in text ↑
t0

“pomegranate”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 56–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ASA sprays did not affect yield.

Taxon
pomegranatePunica granatumt0
Treatment
Foliar sprays with ASAe0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
did not affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Foliar sprays with ASA did not affect yield, but induced a trend of bigger-sized fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1290–1376 · show in text ↑
t0

“pomegranate”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 56–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ASA sprays tended to produce bigger fruit.

Taxon
pomegranatePunica granatumt0
Treatment
Foliar sprays with ASAe0
Outcome
bigger-sized fruite0
Direction
bigger-sizede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Foliar sprays with ASA did not affect yield, but induced a trend of bigger-sized fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1290–1376 · show in text ↑
t0

“pomegranate”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 56–67 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Authors recommend north–south rows to control cracking and russeting.

Taxon
pomegranatePunica granatume0
Treatment
N-S row orientatione0
Outcome
control CR and RSe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“planting in a N-S row orientation and selecting an orchard plantation site with a minimum temperature fluctuation and low relative humidity during the fruit-ripening period are measures to control CR and RS in pomegranate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1393–1614 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Authors recommend sites with low temperature fluctuation and humidity to control cracking and russeting.

Taxon
pomegranatePunica granatume0
Treatment
minimum temperature fluctuation and low relative humiditye0
Outcome
control CR and RSe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“planting in a N-S row orientation and selecting an orchard plantation site with a minimum temperature fluctuation and low relative humidity during the fruit-ripening period are measures to control CR and RS in pomegranate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1393–1614 · show in text ↑

application · yield · Punica granatum (pomegranate)Positive and negative results

48 papers: 47 positive, 1 negative or no effect

47 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

44 papers more in this group

See all 48 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.