Paper · 2019 · International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences

Effect of Nano ZnO on Growth and Yield of Finger Millet [Eleusine coracana (L.) Garten.]

Saras wathi; Y. Vishwanath Sheety; M. Dinesh Kumar; et al.

7
claims
16
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

With the growing limitation in arable land and water resources, the development of agriculture sector is only possible by increasing resources use efficiency with the minimum damage to agro ecology through effective use of modern technologies. Among these, nano technology has the potential to revolutionize agriculture system. An investigation was initiated to examine the effect of nano scale zinc oxide particle on plant growth and development. In view of the widespread cultivation of ragi in India and other parts of the globe and view of the potential influence of zinc on its growth, this crop was chosen as the model system. A pot culture experiment was conducted during Rabi 2016-2017 with the foliar application of nano scale zinc oxide particle at lower rate dose compared to the chelated zinc sulphate recommended and we recorded higher grain yield (9.60 g plant-1) and straw yield (15.87 g plant-1) in T7 which receive nano ZnO @ 500 ppm ha-1 as foliar spray respectively, compared to chelated zinc sulphate. The inhibitory effect with the higher dose nano particle concentration (nano ZnO @ 1250 ppm) reveals the need for judicious usage of this particle in such application, this study show that the use of nano fertilizers causes an increase in nutrient use efficiency, reduces soil toxicity associated with over dosage and reduces the frequency of the application. Hence nanotechnology a high potential for achieving sustainable agriculture, especially in developing countries.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar nano ZnO at 500 ppm ha-1 gave higher grain yield (9.60 g plant-1) in finger millet than chelated zinc sulphate in a pot experiment.

Taxon
Eleusine coracanaEleusine coracanat0
Treatment
nano ZnO @ 500 ppm ha-1 as foliar spraye1
Outcome
grain yielde1
Direction
highere1
Value
9.60 g plant-1e1
Comparator
chelated zinc sulphatee1
Setting
pot culture experimente2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Effect of Nano ZnO on Growth and Yield of Finger Millet [Eleusine coracana (L.) Garten.]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–88 · show in text ↑
e1

“higher grain yield (9.60 g plant-1) and straw yield (15.87 g plant-1) in T7 which receive nano ZnO @ 500 ppm ha-1 as foliar spray respectively, compared to chelated zinc sulphate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 842–1020 · show in text ↑
e2

“A pot culture experiment was conducted during Rabi 2016-2017”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 633–693 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar nano ZnO at 500 ppm ha-1 gave higher straw yield (15.87 g plant-1) in finger millet than chelated zinc sulphate in a pot experiment.

Taxon
Eleusine coracanaEleusine coracanat0
Treatment
nano ZnO @ 500 ppm ha-1 as foliar spraye1
Outcome
straw yielde1
Direction
highere1
Value
15.87 g plant-1e1
Comparator
chelated zinc sulphatee1
Setting
pot culture experimente2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Effect of Nano ZnO on Growth and Yield of Finger Millet [Eleusine coracana (L.) Garten.]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–88 · show in text ↑
e1

“higher grain yield (9.60 g plant-1) and straw yield (15.87 g plant-1) in T7 which receive nano ZnO @ 500 ppm ha-1 as foliar spray respectively, compared to chelated zinc sulphate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 842–1020 · show in text ↑
e2

“A pot culture experiment was conducted during Rabi 2016-2017”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 633–693 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The higher nano ZnO dose of 1250 ppm had an inhibitory effect on finger millet.

Taxon
Eleusine coracanaEleusine coracanat0
Treatment
nano ZnO @ 1250 ppme3
Outcome
inhibitory effecte3
Direction
decreaseinferrede3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Effect of Nano ZnO on Growth and Yield of Finger Millet [Eleusine coracana (L.) Garten.]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–88 · show in text ↑
e3

“The inhibitory effect with the higher dose nano particle concentration (nano ZnO @ 1250 ppm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1022–1114 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Use of nano fertilizers increased nutrient use efficiency in finger millet, according to the authors.

Taxon
Eleusine coracanaEleusine coracanat0
Treatment
use of nano fertilizerse4
Outcome
nutrient use efficiencye4
Direction
increasee4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Effect of Nano ZnO on Growth and Yield of Finger Millet [Eleusine coracana (L.) Garten.]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–88 · show in text ↑
e4

“this study show that the use of nano fertilizers causes an increase in nutrient use efficiency, reduces soil toxicity associated with over dosage and reduces the frequency of the application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1190–1380 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Use of nano fertilizers reduced soil toxicity associated with over dosage, according to the authors.

Taxon
Eleusine coracanaEleusine coracanat0
Treatment
use of nano fertilizerse4
Outcome
soil toxicitye4
Direction
reducese4
Qualifier
associated with over dosagee4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Effect of Nano ZnO on Growth and Yield of Finger Millet [Eleusine coracana (L.) Garten.]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–88 · show in text ↑
e4

“this study show that the use of nano fertilizers causes an increase in nutrient use efficiency, reduces soil toxicity associated with over dosage and reduces the frequency of the application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1190–1380 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Use of nano fertilizers reduced the frequency of application needed, according to the authors.

Taxon
Eleusine coracanaEleusine coracanat0
Treatment
use of nano fertilizerse4
Outcome
frequency of the applicatione4
Direction
reducese4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Effect of Nano ZnO on Growth and Yield of Finger Millet [Eleusine coracana (L.) Garten.]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–88 · show in text ↑
e4

“this study show that the use of nano fertilizers causes an increase in nutrient use efficiency, reduces soil toxicity associated with over dosage and reduces the frequency of the application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1190–1380 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend judicious use of nano ZnO because the higher dose inhibited finger millet.

Taxon
Eleusine coracanaEleusine coracanat0
Outcome
judicious usage of this particlee5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Effect of Nano ZnO on Growth and Yield of Finger Millet [Eleusine coracana (L.) Garten.]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–88 · show in text ↑
e5

“reveals the need for judicious usage of this particle in such application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1115–1188 · show in text ↑

zinc oxide · yield · Eleusine coracana (finger millet)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

nanoparticle · yield · Eleusine coracana (finger millet)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 15 positive, 1 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
    NP (67.2 kg N/ha) gave finger millet grain yields similar to NPK application (11.4 and 10.5 q/ha).

    Additive effect of fertilizer applications on rainfed finger millet. · 1975 · compared with NPK (67.2kg N, 44.4kg each of P and K/ha) application

    No difference from an alternative

  3. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

nanoparticle · nutrient: efficiency · Eleusine coracana (finger millet)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: efficiency · Eleusine coracana (finger millet)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

application · yield · Eleusine coracana (finger millet)Results agree

56 papers: 56 positive, 0 negative or no effect

55 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

52 papers more in this group

See all 56 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.