Paper · 2023 · Indian Journal of Agronomy

Nitrogen, Rhizobium and molybdenum for higher soil bacterial population, N uptake and productivity of lentil (Lens culinaris) grown under rice (Oryza sativa)-fallow conditions

H. KALITA; R. CHAKRABARTY; A.S.N. ZAMAN

16
claims
29
verbatim quotes
1
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted during the winter (rabi) seasons of 2014–15, 2015–16 and 2016–17 in loamy soils of the Regional Agricultural Research Station, Assam Agricultural University, Shillongani, Assam, to study the effect of varying doses of nitrogen, Rhizobium and molybdenum on bacterial population in soil, N uptake, yield attributes, grain yield and economics of lentil (Lens culinaris Medikus spp. culinaris) grown after the harvesting of winter rice (Oryza sativa L.) variety ‘Gitesh’. Soil bacterial population increased with the increase in nitrogen doses. The crop grown using seeds inoculated with Rhizobium @ 50 g/kg seed and sodium molybdate @ 1 g/kg seed along with 100% of recommended dose (RD) of N (15 kg/ha) accrued in the highest bacterial population in the soil at harvesting. Seed inoculation with Rhizobium and sodium molybdate led to considerably higher bacterial population build up in soil than seed inoculation with Rhizobium and sodium molybdate separately. Nitrogen uptake by lentil got reduced with decreasing N doses, being 28.54 kg/ha under RD of N and 28.03 kg/ha under 75% of recommended N. The treatment combinations involving RD and 75% of RD of N (11.25 kg/ha) and seed inoculation with Rhizobium and sodium molybdate recorded 35.16 kg/ha and 34.97 kg/ha N uptake respectively. These 2 treatment combinations ultimately accrued in higher values for plant height, pods/plant, seeds/pod and 100-seed weight and significantly higher grain yield (928.90 and 868.89 kg/ha respectively) as compared to all other treatment combinations. Benefit: cost ratios under these 2 treatment combinations were 2.18 and 2.09 respectively. The treatment combinations were tested for maximizing lentil production utilizing rice-fallows and farmers’ acceptability in farmers’ fields during rabi 2017–18 through 3 Krishi Vigyan Kendras (KVK) in Upper Brahmaputra Valley (UBV) in Jorhat district, Central Brahmaputra Valley (CBV) in Nagaon district and Lower Brahmaputra Valley (LBV) in Nalbari district of the state. The RD of N + seed inoculation with Rhizobium and sodium molybdate yielded the highest (5.8–8.2 q/ha) at all the locations closely followed by 75% RD of N + Rhizobium + sodium molybdate (5.93–7.25 q/ha).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 16

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil bacterial population increased with increasing nitrogen doses in the lentil field experiment.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
nitrogen dosese0
Outcome
Soil bacterial populatione0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Soil bacterial population increased with the increase in nitrogen doses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 501–572 · show in text ↑
t0

“lentil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–108 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed inoculation with Rhizobium at 50 g/kg and sodium molybdate at 1 g/kg along with 100% of the recommended N dose (15 kg/ha) gave the highest soil bacterial population at harvest.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
seeds inoculated with Rhizobium @ 50 g/kg seed and sodium molybdate @ 1 g/kg seed along with 100% of recommended dose (RD) of N (15 kg/ha)e0
Interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiume0symbiont
Outcome
bacterial population in the soile0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The crop grown using seeds inoculated with Rhizobium @ 50 g/kg seed and sodium molybdate @ 1 g/kg seed along with 100% of recommended dose (RD) of N (15 kg/ha) accrued in the highest bacterial population in the soil at harvesting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 574–803 · show in text ↑
t0

“lentil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–108 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed inoculation with Rhizobium and sodium molybdate together led to considerably higher soil bacterial population build-up than inoculation with each separately.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
Seed inoculation with Rhizobium and sodium molybdatee0
Interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiume0symbiont
Outcome
bacterial population build up in soile0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
seed inoculation with Rhizobium and sodium molybdate separatelye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seed inoculation with Rhizobium and sodium molybdate led to considerably higher bacterial population build up in soil than seed inoculation with Rhizobium and sodium molybdate separately”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 805–991 · show in text ↑
t0

“lentil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–108 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen uptake by lentil was reduced with decreasing N doses.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarise0
Treatment
decreasing N dosese0
Outcome
Nitrogen uptakee0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nitrogen uptake by lentil got reduced with decreasing N doses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 993–1054 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen uptake by lentil was 28.54 kg/ha under the recommended dose of N.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarise0
Outcome
Nitrogen uptakee0
Value
28.54 kg/hae0
Qualifier
under RD of Ne0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nitrogen uptake by lentil got reduced with decreasing N doses, being 28.54 kg/ha under RD of N and 28.03 kg/ha under 75% of recommended N”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 993–1130 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen uptake by lentil was 28.03 kg/ha under 75% of the recommended N.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarise0
Outcome
Nitrogen uptakee0
Value
28.03 kg/hae0
Qualifier
under 75% of recommended Ne0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nitrogen uptake by lentil got reduced with decreasing N doses, being 28.54 kg/ha under RD of N and 28.03 kg/ha under 75% of recommended N”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 993–1130 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The recommended dose of N plus seed inoculation with Rhizobium and sodium molybdate gave a lentil N uptake of 35.16 kg/ha.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarist0
Interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiume0symbiont
Outcome
N uptakee0
Value
35.16 kg/hae0
Qualifier
RDe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The treatment combinations involving RD and 75% of RD of N (11.25 kg/ha) and seed inoculation with Rhizobium and sodium molybdate recorded 35.16 kg/ha and 34.97 kg/ha N uptake respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1132–1320 · show in text ↑
t0

“lentil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–108 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

75% of the recommended N (11.25 kg/ha) plus seed inoculation with Rhizobium and sodium molybdate gave a lentil N uptake of 34.97 kg/ha.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarist0
Interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiume0symbiont
Outcome
N uptakee0
Value
34.97 kg/hae0
Qualifier
75% of RD of N (11.25 kg/ha)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The treatment combinations involving RD and 75% of RD of N (11.25 kg/ha) and seed inoculation with Rhizobium and sodium molybdate recorded 35.16 kg/ha and 34.97 kg/ha N uptake respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1132–1320 · show in text ↑
t0

“lentil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–108 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The two best treatment combinations (recommended or 75% of recommended N with Rhizobium and sodium molybdate) gave higher plant height, pods per plant and seeds per pod than all other combinations.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
These 2 treatment combinationse0
Outcome
plant height, pods/plant, seeds/pode0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
all other treatment combinationse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“These 2 treatment combinations ultimately accrued in higher values for plant height, pods/plant, seeds/pod and 100-seed weight and significantly higher grain yield (928.90 and 868.89 kg/ha respectively) as compared to all other treatment combinations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1322–1572 · show in text ↑
t0

“lentil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–108 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The two best treatment combinations gave higher 100-seed weight than all other combinations.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
These 2 treatment combinationse0
Outcome
100-seed weighte0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
all other treatment combinationse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“These 2 treatment combinations ultimately accrued in higher values for plant height, pods/plant, seeds/pod and 100-seed weight and significantly higher grain yield (928.90 and 868.89 kg/ha respectively) as compared to all other treatment combinations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1322–1572 · show in text ↑
t0

“lentil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–108 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The first of the two best treatment combinations gave significantly higher lentil grain yield, 928.90 kg/ha, than all other combinations.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
These 2 treatment combinationse0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
928.90e0
Qualifier
928.90 and 868.89 kg/ha respectivelye0
Comparator
all other treatment combinationse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“These 2 treatment combinations ultimately accrued in higher values for plant height, pods/plant, seeds/pod and 100-seed weight and significantly higher grain yield (928.90 and 868.89 kg/ha respectively) as compared to all other treatment combinations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1322–1572 · show in text ↑
t0

“lentil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–108 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The second of the two best treatment combinations gave significantly higher lentil grain yield, 868.89 kg/ha, than all other combinations.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
These 2 treatment combinationse0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
868.89 kg/hae0
Qualifier
928.90 and 868.89 kg/ha respectivelye0
Comparator
all other treatment combinationse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“These 2 treatment combinations ultimately accrued in higher values for plant height, pods/plant, seeds/pod and 100-seed weight and significantly higher grain yield (928.90 and 868.89 kg/ha respectively) as compared to all other treatment combinations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1322–1572 · show in text ↑
t0

“lentil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–108 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The benefit:cost ratio of the first of the two best treatment combinations was 2.18.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarist0
Outcome
Benefit: cost ratiose0
Value
2.18e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Benefit: cost ratios under these 2 treatment combinations were 2.18 and 2.09 respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1574–1663 · show in text ↑
t0

“lentil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–108 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The benefit:cost ratio of the second of the two best treatment combinations was 2.09.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarist0
Outcome
Benefit: cost ratiose0
Value
2.09e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Benefit: cost ratios under these 2 treatment combinations were 2.18 and 2.09 respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1574–1663 · show in text ↑
t0

“lentil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–108 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In on-farm tests, the recommended N dose plus Rhizobium and sodium molybdate seed inoculation gave the highest lentil yield, 5.8-8.2 q/ha, at all locations.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
RD of N + seed inoculation with Rhizobium and sodium molybdatee0
Interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiume0symbiont
Outcome
yieldede0
Direction
higheste0
Value
5.8–8.2 q/hae0
Setting
all the locationse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The RD of N + seed inoculation with Rhizobium and sodium molybdate yielded the highest (5.8–8.2 q/ha) at all the locations closely followed by 75% RD of N + Rhizobium + sodium molybdate (5.93–7.25 q/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2039–2241 · show in text ↑
t0

“lentil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–108 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In on-farm tests, 75% of the recommended N plus Rhizobium and sodium molybdate closely followed with a lentil yield of 5.93-7.25 q/ha.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
75% RD of N + Rhizobium + sodium molybdatee0
Interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiume0symbiont
Outcome
yieldede0
Direction
closely followede0
Value
5.93–7.25 q/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The RD of N + seed inoculation with Rhizobium and sodium molybdate yielded the highest (5.8–8.2 q/ha) at all the locations closely followed by 75% RD of N + Rhizobium + sodium molybdate (5.93–7.25 q/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2039–2241 · show in text ↑
t0

“lentil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–108 · show in text ↑

sodium molybdate (anhydrous) · yield · Lens culinaris (lentil)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Rhizobium · yield · Lens culinaris (lentil)Results agree

40 papers: 40 positive, 0 negative or no effect

39 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

36 papers more in this group

See all 40 papers →

inoculation · yield · Lens culinaris (lentil)Results differ

69 papers: 65 positive, 4 negative or no effect

64 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

65 papers more in this group

See all 69 papers →

nitrogen · nutrient: content · Lens culinaris (lentil)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect

7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

inoculation · soil: biology · Lens culinaris (lentil)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.