Abstract
A field experiment was carried out at Sakha Agricultural Research Station in 1998/99 and 1999/2000 seasons to study the effect of N-fertilization and inoculation with Rhizobium and Azotobacter on nodulation, N2-fixation and yield of Giza 51, Sinai 1 and Line 3693 lentil cultivars. Treatments of nitrogen zero and 15 kg/fed. (1 fed. = 0.42 ha) and four treatments of inoculation were used, uninoculated, inoculated with . Rhizobium, Azotobacter and' Rhitobium + Azotobacter . . The results indicated that, the new lentil line 3693, N-fertilization with starter dose (15 Kg·/feO.), and -mixed inoculation with Rhizobium and Azotobacter gave the highest number and dry weight of' nodules and dry weighVplant. The interactions effect between mixed inoculation with Rhizobium and Azotobacter with lentil line 3693 or N-fertilization gave the highest values of these traits. The two cultivars, Giza 51 and line 3693 superior to Sinai-1 cultivar in yield and yield components, in the two growing seasons. While, the data showed that insignificant responseto N-fertilization.on yield and its components. Mixed inoculation of Rhizopiurn .and Azotobacter significantly increased seed yield and all tested components.' Nitrogen seed content was increased by N-fertilization and bacterial inoculation. The interactions between lentil cultivars, N-fertilization and bacterial inoculation on yield and its components were not significant.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 7
Claim · model-written summary
The interaction of mixed inoculation with line 3693 or N-fertilization gave the highest values of these traits.
- Taxon
- Lens culinaris
Lens culinarist1 - Material
- line 3693e2
- Treatment
- mixed inoculation with Rhizobium and Azotobactere2
- Outcome
- values of these traitse2
- Direction
- higheste2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t1“THREE LENTIL (Lens culinaris M.)”
e2“The interactions effect between mixed inoculation with Rhizobium and Azotobacter with lentil line 3693 or N-fertilization gave the highest values of these traits”
Claim · model-written summary
Giza 51 and line 3693 were superior to Sinai-1 in yield and yield components in both seasons.
- Taxon
- Lens culinarisLens culinarist1
- Material
- Giza 51e3
- Outcome
- yield and yield componentse3
- Direction
- superiore3
- Comparator
- Sinai-1 cultivare3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t1“THREE LENTIL (Lens culinaris M.)”
e3“The two cultivars, Giza 51 and line 3693 superior to Sinai-1 cultivar in yield and yield components, in the two growing seasons”
Claim · model-written summary
N-fertilization had no significant effect on yield and its components.
- Taxon
- Lens culinarisLens culinarist1
- Treatment
- N-fertilizatione4
- Outcome
- yield and its componentse4
- Direction
- no_changeinferrede4
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t1“THREE LENTIL (Lens culinaris M.)”
e4“the data showed that insignificant responseto N-fertilization.on yield and its components”
Claim · model-written summary
Mixed inoculation with Rhizobium and Azotobacter significantly increased seed yield and all tested yield components.
- Taxon
- lentilLens culinarise5
- Treatment
- Mixed inoculation of Rhizopiurn .and Azotobactere6
- Outcome
- seed yield and all tested componentse6
- Direction
- increasede6
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e5“Giza 51, Sinai 1 and Line 3693 lentil cultivars”
e6“Mixed inoculation of Rhizopiurn .and Azotobacter significantly increased seed yield and all tested components”
Claim · model-written summary
N-fertilization increased seed nitrogen content.
- Taxon
- lentilLens culinarise5
- Treatment
- N-fertilizatione7
- Outcome
- Nitrogen seed contente7
- Direction
- increasede7
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e5“Giza 51, Sinai 1 and Line 3693 lentil cultivars”
e7“Nitrogen seed content was increased by N-fertilization and bacterial inoculation”
Claim · model-written summary
Bacterial inoculation increased seed nitrogen content.
- Taxon
- lentilLens culinarise5
- Treatment
- bacterial inoculatione7
- Outcome
- Nitrogen seed contente7
- Direction
- increasede7
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e5“Giza 51, Sinai 1 and Line 3693 lentil cultivars”
e7“Nitrogen seed content was increased by N-fertilization and bacterial inoculation”
Claim · model-written summary
Interactions between cultivar, N-fertilization and bacterial inoculation on yield and its components were not significant.
- Taxon
- lentilLens culinarise5
- Outcome
- yield and its componentse0
- Qualifier
- were not significante0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e5“Giza 51, Sinai 1 and Line 3693 lentil cultivars”
e0“The interactions between lentil cultivars, N-fertilization and bacterial inoculation on yield and its components were not significant”
The same questions in other papers
Azotobacter · yield · Lens culinaris (lentil)Results agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
nitrogen · yield · Lens culinaris (lentil)Results differ
36 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
33 papers more in this group
See all 37 papers →inoculation · yield · Lens culinaris (lentil)Results differ
64 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- negative
65 papers more in this group
See all 69 papers →inoculation · molecular: metabolites · Lens culinaris (lentil)Results agree
3 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.