Abstract
The aim of the study was to assess the impact of N Pro and Seactiv Complex technologies based on sea algae extracts on the yield and quality of Golden Delicious apple trees compared to the standard fertilization program. Research conducted in the years 2008–2017 showed that the tree fertilization technology and the year of research had a significant impact on the quality and yield parameters. The abundance of seaweed extracts had a positive effect on the greater number of fruits per tree (pcs.), their weight (t × ha−1; kg tree−1), the percentage of fruits exceeding 7.5 cm in size (%) and the average weight of fruits (g) compared to the control combination. In most of the analyzed study years, total yield exceeded the 90 t × threshold regardless of the fertilization program. The use of technology based on sea algae extracts during 10 years of research had a positive effect on the quality and weight compared to the standard fertilization technology commonly used in cultivation.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 7
Claim · model-written summary
Fertilization technology and research year significantly affected apple quality and yield parameters.
- Taxon
- Apple Trees
Malus domesticat0 - Treatment
- tree fertilization technologye0
- Outcome
- quality and yield parameterse0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Golden Delicious Apple Trees”
e0“the tree fertilization technology and the year of research had a significant impact on the quality and yield parameters”
Claim · model-written summary
Seaweed extracts increased the number of apples per tree relative to control.
- Taxon
- Apple TreesMalus domesticat0
- Treatment
- seaweed extractse0
- Outcome
- number of fruits per treee0
- Direction
- greatere0
- Comparator
- control combinatione0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Golden Delicious Apple Trees”
e0“The abundance of seaweed extracts had a positive effect on the greater number of fruits per tree (pcs.), their weight (t × ha−1; kg tree−1), the percentage of fruits exceeding 7.5 cm in size (%) and the average weight of fruits (g) compared to the control combination”
Claim · model-written summary
Seaweed extracts increased apple fruit weight relative to control.
- Taxon
- Apple TreesMalus domesticat0
- Treatment
- seaweed extractse0
- Outcome
- their weighte0
- Direction
- positive effecte0
- Comparator
- control combinatione0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Golden Delicious Apple Trees”
e0“The abundance of seaweed extracts had a positive effect on the greater number of fruits per tree (pcs.), their weight (t × ha−1; kg tree−1), the percentage of fruits exceeding 7.5 cm in size (%) and the average weight of fruits (g) compared to the control combination”
Claim · model-written summary
Seaweed extracts increased the percentage of apples exceeding 7.5 cm relative to control.
- Taxon
- Apple TreesMalus domesticat0
- Treatment
- seaweed extractse0
- Outcome
- percentage of fruits exceeding 7.5 cm in sizee0
- Direction
- positive effecte0
- Comparator
- control combinatione0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Golden Delicious Apple Trees”
e0“The abundance of seaweed extracts had a positive effect on the greater number of fruits per tree (pcs.), their weight (t × ha−1; kg tree−1), the percentage of fruits exceeding 7.5 cm in size (%) and the average weight of fruits (g) compared to the control combination”
Claim · model-written summary
Seaweed extracts increased average apple fruit weight relative to control.
- Taxon
- Apple TreesMalus domesticat0
- Treatment
- seaweed extractse0
- Outcome
- average weight of fruitse0
- Direction
- positive effecte0
- Comparator
- control combinatione0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Golden Delicious Apple Trees”
e0“The abundance of seaweed extracts had a positive effect on the greater number of fruits per tree (pcs.), their weight (t × ha−1; kg tree−1), the percentage of fruits exceeding 7.5 cm in size (%) and the average weight of fruits (g) compared to the control combination”
Claim · model-written summary
Total apple yield exceeded the reported threshold in most years regardless of fertilization program.
- Taxon
- Apple TreesMalus domesticat0
- Outcome
- total yielde0
- Direction
- exceedede0
- Value
- 90 t ×e0
- Qualifier
- most of the analyzed study yearse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Golden Delicious Apple Trees”
e0“In most of the analyzed study years, total yield exceeded the 90 t × threshold regardless of the fertilization program”
Claim · model-written summary
Over ten years, sea-algae-extract technology improved apple quality and weight relative to standard fertilization.
- Taxon
- Apple TreesMalus domesticat0
- Treatment
- technology based on sea algae extractse0
- Outcome
- quality and weighte0
- Direction
- positive effecte0
- Qualifier
- during 10 years of researche0
- Comparator
- standard fertilization technologye0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Golden Delicious Apple Trees”
e0“The use of technology based on sea algae extracts during 10 years of research had a positive effect on the quality and weight compared to the standard fertilization technology commonly used in cultivation”
The same questions in other papers
other · yield · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results
10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
11 papers more in this group
See all 15 papers →other · growth · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results
17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- positive
16 papers more in this group
See all 20 papers →botanical · quality: general · Malus domestica (apple)Results agree
5 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.