Paper · 2015 · eCommons (Cornell University)

Strategies To Improve Growth And Yield In The Early Life Of A Tall Spindle Apple Planting

L.I. Dominguez

6
claims
13
verbatim quotes
4
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The success of a new high-density apple planting depends on how fast the grower can recoup the high investment that these systems require. That is why it is imperative to get new plantings into production as early as possible and recoup the costs of establishment in the first five years. In order to achieve high early yields, the grower needs to find the right balance between vegetative growth and cropping during the early life of the planting where trees grow adequately to fill the allotted space at the same time produce good early crops. In this study we evaluated several management strategies to improve growth and yield, and to find the right balance between them. These results will improve understanding how to manage these intensive systems in the most profitable way. In 2009, an orchard with five varieties (Crispin, 'Gala', 'Honeycrisp', 'Jonagold' and 'Macoun') on M.9 size rootstocks was planted at the New York State Agricultural Experiment Station, Geneva, NY. In this experiment we compared the use of calcium nitrate at the rate of (113 kg N/ha) applied through fertigation, broadcast with no irrigation and broadcast with irrigation. We evaluated the use of biostimulants and plastic mulch and compared the use of unbranched nursery trees (whips), with nursery trees having 5 and 10 feathers, with the lateral branches managed at a natural angle or positioned below horizontal. Our results showed that fertigation and irrigation increased yield and tree growth compared to the unirrigated treatment. The use of biostimulants did not have any effect on tree growth or yield with the exception of 'Honeycrisp'. Plastic mulch increased yield in 'Honeycrisp' and 'Jonagold' but there was no improvement in growth or yield with the other varieties. Bending the feathers below horizontal increased yield early in the life of the planting especially for more vigorous varieties with upright growth.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertigation and irrigation increased yield and tree growth of apple compared with the unirrigated treatment.

Treatment
fertigation and irrigatione1
Outcome
yield and tree growthe1
Direction
increasede1
Comparator
unirrigated treatmente1
Setting
New York State Agricultural Experiment Station, Geneva, NYe2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“new high-density apple planting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 17–48 · show in text ↑
e1

“fertigation and irrigation increased yield and tree growth compared to the unirrigated treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1426–1522 · show in text ↑
e2

“planted at the New York State Agricultural Experiment Station, Geneva, NY”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 907–980 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biostimulants had no effect on tree growth or yield of apple, except for Honeycrisp.

Treatment
biostimulantse1
Outcome
tree growth or yielde1
Direction
no_changeinferrede1
Qualifier
with the exception of 'Honeycrisp'e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“new high-density apple planting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 17–48 · show in text ↑
e1

“The use of biostimulants did not have any effect on tree growth or yield with the exception of 'Honeycrisp'”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1524–1631 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plastic mulch increased yield of apple cultivar Honeycrisp.

Material
Honeycrispe1
Treatment
Plastic mulche1
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
increasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“new high-density apple planting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 17–48 · show in text ↑
e1

“Plastic mulch increased yield in 'Honeycrisp' and 'Jonagold'”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1633–1693 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plastic mulch increased yield of apple cultivar Jonagold.

Material
Jonagolde1
Treatment
Plastic mulche1
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
increasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“new high-density apple planting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 17–48 · show in text ↑
e1

“Plastic mulch increased yield in 'Honeycrisp' and 'Jonagold'”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1633–1693 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plastic mulch did not improve growth or yield of the other apple varieties.

Material
other varietiese1
Treatment
Plastic mulche1
Outcome
growth or yielde1
Direction
no_changeinferrede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“new high-density apple planting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 17–48 · show in text ↑
e1

“Plastic mulch increased yield in 'Honeycrisp' and 'Jonagold' but there was no improvement in growth or yield with the other varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1633–1766 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bending the feathers below horizontal increased early yield of apple, especially for more vigorous varieties.

Material
more vigorous varietiese1
Treatment
Bending the feathers below horizontale1
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
increasede1
Qualifier
early in the life of the plantinge1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“new high-density apple planting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 17–48 · show in text ↑
e1

“Bending the feathers below horizontal increased yield early in the life of the planting especially for more vigorous varieties with upright growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1768–1914 · show in text ↑

mulching · yield · Malus domestica (apple)Results differ

51 papers: 41 positive, 10 negative or no effect

40 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

47 papers more in this group

See all 51 papers →

other · yield · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 11 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

irrigation · yield · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

84 papers: 63 positive, 21 negative or no effect

62 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

80 papers more in this group

See all 84 papers →

fertilization · yield · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

178 papers: 150 positive, 28 negative or no effect

149 papers in the same direction as this paper · 26 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

174 papers more in this group

See all 178 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.