Paper · 2023 · South African Journal of Botany

Unraveling the mechanisms of drought tolerance enhancement in Sorghum bicolor through Glomus mosseae inoculation: Insights from comparative analysis of Super 2 and Konawe Selatan accessions

Devanda Ayu Lidya Permata Putri; Rahayu Widyastuti; Idris Idris; et al.

18
claims
39
verbatim quotes
9
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The increasing frequency of droughts due to climate change has negatively impacted crop yield. This research aimed to study the mechanism of Glomus mosseae in improving the drought tolerance of Sorghum bicolor plants, specifically in Super 2 (S2) and Konawe Selatan (KS) accession. G. mosseae was used to inoculate the plants grown in the sterile zeolite. The drought was imposed in two cycles by suspending irrigation for six days per cycle. After nine weeks, the plants were harvested and subjected to various analyses. The results showed that drought stress lowered biomass, pigment concentrations by 45% and 23%, and leaf relative water content (RWC) by 34% and 17% for S2 and KS accessions, respectively. Conversely, malondialdehyde (MDA) levels rose by 20% and 9%, while proline synthesis was improved by 7% and 16% on S2 and KS, respectively, compared to the control. In contrast, inoculation with G. mosseae markedly augmented chlorophyll levels by 85% and 25%, elevated leaf relative water content by 33% and 8%, and enhanced P content by 20% and 19% for S2 and KS accessions, respectively, when compared to drought-exposed treatments. Additionally, G. mosseae inoculation preserved root length, biomass, leaf number, proline synthesis, and nitrogen content, while inducing a reduction in MDA levels by 11% and 6% in S2 and KS, respectively, in relation to the drought treatments. G. mosseae improves sorghum's drought tolerance by reducing water loss through improving water and nutrient uptake via external hyphae and enhancing photosynthetic properties via pigment protection. Furthermore, it was shown that G. mosseae is highly efficient at maintaining proline balance and enhancing the effectiveness of both enzymatic and non-enzymatic antioxidants to eliminate reactive oxygen species (ROS). KS accession exhibited elevated levels of nitrogen content, leaf number, upper ground biomass, chlorophyll and RWC. Conversely, the Super 2 accession manifested higher levels of lower ground biomass, root length, root colonization and phosphorus content. The addition of G. mosseae to the soil shows great potential as a sustainable agricultural approach under climate change conditions, specifically for the promotion of sorghum plant survival under drought stress. This potential stems from the ability of G. mosseae to enhance key plant properties, including photosynthetic performance and water balance regulation, through the expansion of extraradical hyphal growth. Moreover, G. mosseae supplementation maintains proline levels, enhances nutrient uptake and detoxifies reactive oxygen species by promoting antioxidant capacity. As a result of these properties, sorghum plants exhibit increased biomass and resistance to drought stress, providing an important tool for future sustainable agriculture under climate change.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 18

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought lowered pigment concentrations by 45% in S2 and 23% in KS.

Taxon
Sorghum bicolorSorghum bicolort0
Material
S2 and KS accessionse0
Treatment
drought stresse0
Outcome
pigment concentrationse0
Direction
lowerede0
Value
45% and 23%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“drought stress lowered biomass, pigment concentrations by 45% and 23%, and leaf relative water content (RWC) by 34% and 17% for S2 and KS accessions, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 546–708 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sorghum bicolor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–77 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought lowered leaf RWC by 34% in S2 and 17% in KS.

Taxon
Sorghum bicolorSorghum bicolort0
Material
S2 and KS accessionse0
Treatment
drought stresse0
Outcome
leaf relative water content (RWC)e0
Direction
lowerede0
Value
34% and 17%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“drought stress lowered biomass, pigment concentrations by 45% and 23%, and leaf relative water content (RWC) by 34% and 17% for S2 and KS accessions, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 546–708 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sorghum bicolor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–77 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought lowered biomass in S2 and KS.

Taxon
Sorghum bicolorSorghum bicolort0
Material
S2 and KS accessionse0
Treatment
drought stresse0
Outcome
biomasse0
Direction
lowerede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“drought stress lowered biomass, pigment concentrations by 45% and 23%, and leaf relative water content (RWC) by 34% and 17% for S2 and KS accessions, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 546–708 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sorghum bicolor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–77 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought increased MDA by 20% in S2 and 9% in KS.

Taxon
Sorghum bicolorSorghum bicolort0
Treatment
droughte1
Outcome
malondialdehyde (MDA) levelse0
Direction
rosee0
Value
20% and 9%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“malondialdehyde (MDA) levels rose by 20% and 9%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 722–769 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sorghum bicolor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–77 · show in text ↑
e1

“drought stress lowered biomass, pigment concentrations by 45% and 23%, and leaf relative water content (RWC) by 34% and 17% for S2 and KS accessions, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 546–708 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought increased proline synthesis by 7% in S2 and 16% in KS.

Taxon
Sorghum bicolorSorghum bicolort0
Material
S2 and KSe0
Treatment
droughte1
Outcome
proline synthesise0
Direction
improvede0
Value
7% and 16%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“proline synthesis was improved by 7% and 16% on S2 and KS, respectively, compared to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 777–873 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sorghum bicolor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–77 · show in text ↑
e1

“drought stress lowered biomass, pigment concentrations by 45% and 23%, and leaf relative water content (RWC) by 34% and 17% for S2 and KS accessions, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 546–708 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glomus inoculation raised chlorophyll by 85% in S2 and 25% in KS relative to drought alone.

Taxon
Sorghum bicolorSorghum bicolort0
Treatment
inoculation with G. mosseaee0
Interactor
G. mosseaeFunneliformis mosseaee0symbiont
Outcome
chlorophyll levelse0
Direction
augmentede0
Value
85% and 25%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Funneliformis mosseae
Funneliformis mosseae · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categorySamson90 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“inoculation with G. mosseae markedly augmented chlorophyll levels by 85% and 25%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 888–968 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sorghum bicolor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–77 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glomus inoculation raised RWC by 33% in S2 and 8% in KS.

Taxon
Sorghum bicolorSorghum bicolort0
Treatment
inoculation with G. mosseaee1
Interactor
G. mosseaeFunneliformis mosseaee1symbiont
Outcome
leaf relative water contente0
Direction
elevatede0
Value
33% and 8%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Funneliformis mosseae
Funneliformis mosseae · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categorySamson90 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“elevated leaf relative water content by 33% and 8%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 970–1020 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sorghum bicolor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–77 · show in text ↑
e1

“inoculation with G. mosseae markedly augmented chlorophyll levels by 85% and 25%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 888–968 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glomus inoculation raised P content by 20% in S2 and 19% in KS.

Taxon
Sorghum bicolorSorghum bicolort0
Material
S2 and KS accessionse0
Treatment
inoculation with G. mosseaee1
Interactor
G. mosseaeFunneliformis mosseaee1symbiont
Outcome
P contente0
Direction
enhancede0
Value
20% and 19%e0
Comparator
drought-exposed treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Funneliformis mosseae
Funneliformis mosseae · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categorySamson90 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“enhanced P content by 20% and 19% for S2 and KS accessions, respectively, when compared to drought-exposed treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1026–1143 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sorghum bicolor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–77 · show in text ↑
e1

“inoculation with G. mosseae markedly augmented chlorophyll levels by 85% and 25%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 888–968 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glomus inoculation preserved root length, biomass and leaf number.

Taxon
Sorghum bicolorSorghum bicolort0
Treatment
G. mosseae inoculatione0
Interactor
G. mosseaeFunneliformis mosseaee0symbiont
Outcome
root length, biomass, leaf numbere0
Direction
preservede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Funneliformis mosseae
Funneliformis mosseae · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categorySamson90 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“G. mosseae inoculation preserved root length, biomass, leaf number, proline synthesis, and nitrogen content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1159–1266 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sorghum bicolor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–77 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glomus inoculation preserved proline synthesis and nitrogen content.

Taxon
Sorghum bicolorSorghum bicolort0
Treatment
G. mosseae inoculatione0
Interactor
G. mosseaeFunneliformis mosseaee0symbiont
Outcome
proline synthesis, and nitrogen contente0
Direction
preservede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Funneliformis mosseae
Funneliformis mosseae · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categorySamson90 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“G. mosseae inoculation preserved root length, biomass, leaf number, proline synthesis, and nitrogen content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1159–1266 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sorghum bicolor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–77 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glomus inoculation reduced MDA by 11% in S2 and 6% in KS relative to drought.

Taxon
Sorghum bicolorSorghum bicolort0
Material
S2 and KSe0
Treatment
G. mosseae inoculatione1
Interactor
G. mosseaeFunneliformis mosseaee1symbiont
Outcome
MDA levelse0
Direction
reductione0
Value
11% and 6%e0
Comparator
drought treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Funneliformis mosseae
Funneliformis mosseae · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categorySamson90 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“inducing a reduction in MDA levels by 11% and 6% in S2 and KS, respectively, in relation to the drought treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1274–1388 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sorghum bicolor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–77 · show in text ↑
e1

“G. mosseae inoculation preserved root length, biomass, leaf number, proline synthesis, and nitrogen content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1159–1266 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

KS had elevated nitrogen content, leaf number and aboveground biomass.

Taxon
Sorghum bicolorSorghum bicolort0
Material
KS accessione0
Outcome
nitrogen content, leaf number, upper ground biomasse0
Direction
elevatede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“KS accession exhibited elevated levels of nitrogen content, leaf number, upper ground biomass, chlorophyll and RWC”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1807–1921 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sorghum bicolor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–77 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

KS had elevated chlorophyll and RWC.

Taxon
Sorghum bicolorSorghum bicolort0
Material
KS accessione0
Outcome
chlorophyll and RWCe0
Direction
elevatede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“KS accession exhibited elevated levels of nitrogen content, leaf number, upper ground biomass, chlorophyll and RWC”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1807–1921 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sorghum bicolor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–77 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Super 2 had higher belowground biomass, root length and colonization.

Taxon
Sorghum bicolorSorghum bicolort0
Material
Super 2 accessione0
Outcome
lower ground biomass, root length, root colonizatione0
Direction
highere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the Super 2 accession manifested higher levels of lower ground biomass, root length, root colonization and phosphorus content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1935–2060 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sorghum bicolor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–77 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Super 2 had higher phosphorus content.

Taxon
Sorghum bicolorSorghum bicolort0
Material
Super 2 accessione0
Outcome
phosphorus contente0
Direction
highere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the Super 2 accession manifested higher levels of lower ground biomass, root length, root colonization and phosphorus content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1935–2060 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sorghum bicolor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–77 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glomus improves drought tolerance through water and nutrient uptake via hyphae and pigment protection.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume0
Interactor
G. mosseaeFunneliformis mosseaee0symbiont
Outcome
drought tolerancee0
Qualifier
improving water and nutrient uptake via external hyphaee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Funneliformis mosseae
Funneliformis mosseae · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categorySamson90 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“G. mosseae improves sorghum's drought tolerance by reducing water loss through improving water and nutrient uptake via external hyphae and enhancing photosynthetic properties via pigment protection”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1390–1587 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glomus maintains proline balance and antioxidant capacity to remove ROS.

Taxon
Sorghum bicolorSorghum bicolort0
Interactor
G. mosseaeFunneliformis mosseaee0symbiont
Outcome
proline balancee0
Qualifier
antioxidants to eliminate reactive oxygen species (ROS)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Funneliformis mosseae
Funneliformis mosseae · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categorySamson90 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“G. mosseae is highly efficient at maintaining proline balance and enhancing the effectiveness of both enzymatic and non-enzymatic antioxidants to eliminate reactive oxygen species (ROS)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1620–1805 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sorghum bicolor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–77 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Glomus addition is recommended as a sustainable approach for sorghum survival under drought.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume0
Interactor
G. mosseaeFunneliformis mosseaee0symbiont
Outcome
promotion of sorghum plant survival under drought stresse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Funneliformis mosseae
Funneliformis mosseae · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categorySamson90 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The addition of G. mosseae to the soil shows great potential as a sustainable agricultural approach under climate change conditions, specifically for the promotion of sorghum plant survival under drought stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2062–2272 · show in text ↑

Funneliformis mosseae · physiology: osmolytes · Sorghum bicolor (sorghum)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Funneliformis mosseae · physiology: oxidative · Sorghum bicolor (sorghum)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

inoculation · physiology: pigments · Sorghum bicolor (sorghum)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

drought · physiology: oxidative · Sorghum bicolor (sorghum)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 1 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

drought · physiology: water · Sorghum bicolor (sorghum)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 2 positive, 10 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

drought · growth · Sorghum bicolor (sorghum)Positive and negative results

29 papers: 5 positive, 24 negative or no effect

23 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

25 papers more in this group

See all 29 papers →

inoculation · physiology: osmolytes · Sorghum bicolor (sorghum)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

inoculation · physiology: water · Sorghum bicolor (sorghum)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

8 of 13 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.