Paper · 2016 · E-Journal Menara Perkebunan

Peranan rizobakteri dan fungi mikoriza arbuskular dalam proses fotosintesis dan produksi gula sorgum manis (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench) Role of rhizobacteria and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in increasing photosynthesis process and sugar production of sweet sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench)

Bedah RUPAEDAH; Iswandi ANAS; Dwi Andreas SANTOSA; et al.

11
claims
22
verbatim quotes
1
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

AbstractDual inoculation effects of rhizobacteria andAMF as well as the addition of chemical fertilizerson photosynthesis were studied by analyzingprocess of CO2 gas exchange, chlorophyll content,nutrient uptake, sugar content and growth of sweetsorghum. AMF inoculation as a single cultureincreased carbon assimilation, stomatal conductance,intercellular CO2 concentration, phosphoruscontent, chlorophyll content, sugar content, plantheight, shoot weight and mycorrhizal colonization.Interaction of AMF and rhizobacteria increasedsugar content of sweet sorghum stems andpotassium content of sweet sorghum leaves,whereas its interaction with chemical fertilizerssignificantly increased chlorophyll content, sugarcontent and mycorrhizal colonization of sorghumplant roots. Interaction of AMF, rhizobacteria andchemical fertilizers increased sugar content, rootweight and mycorrhizal colonization. The use ofAMF solely or its interaction with rhizobacteriaand chemical fertilizers had a great potential inimproving photosynthesis process of sweetsorghum. The process is associated with increasingcrop productivity, such as sugar content ofsorghum which is potential as a source ofrenewable energy.AbstrakPengaruh inokulasi ganda rizobakteri danFMA dengan penambahan pupuk kimia dipelajaridengan cara menganalisis proses pertukaran gas CO2, kandungan klorofil, kandungan hara dan gula,pertumbuhan dan produktivitas sorgum manis.Inokulasi FMA sebagai kultur tunggal dapatmeningkatkan asimilasi karbon, konduktansistomata, konsentrasi CO2 interselular, kandunganfosfor, kandungan klorofil, kandungan gula, tinggitanaman, berat batang dan derajat kolonisasimikoriza. Interaksi antara rizobakteri dan FMAdapat meningkatkan kandungan gula batang dankalium daun sorgum manis, sedangkan interaksinyadengan pupuk kimia dapat meningkatkan kandunganklorofil dan gula serta derajat kolonisasimikoriza pada perakaran sorgum manis. Sementaraitu, interaksi FMA, rizobakteri dan pupuk kimiadapat meningkatkan kandungan gula batang, beratakar dan derajat kolonisasi mikoriza pada perakaransorgum manis. Penggunaan FMA baik sendirimaupun interaksinya dengan rizobakteri dan pupukkimia memiliki potensi besar dalam meningkatkanproses fotosintesis sorgum manis. Proses tersebutberkaitan dengan peningkatan produktivitas sorgummanis dalam hal ini kandungan gula sorgum manisyang berpotensi sebagai sumber energi terbarukan.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF alone increased carbon assimilation, stomatal conductance and intercellular CO2.

Taxon
sweet sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench)Sorghum bicolort0
Treatment
AMF inoculation as a single culturee0
Interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Outcome
carbon assimilation, stomatal conductance,intercellular CO2 concentratione0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“AMF inoculation as a single cultureincreased carbon assimilation, stomatal conductance,intercellular CO2 concentration, phosphoruscontent, chlorophyll content, sugar content, plantheight, shoot weight and mycorrhizal colonization.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 255–485 · show in text ↑
t0

“sweet sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 251–292 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF alone increased phosphorus, chlorophyll and sugar content.

Taxon
sweet sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench)Sorghum bicolort0
Treatment
AMF inoculation as a single culturee0
Interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Outcome
phosphoruscontent, chlorophyll content, sugar contente0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“AMF inoculation as a single cultureincreased carbon assimilation, stomatal conductance,intercellular CO2 concentration, phosphoruscontent, chlorophyll content, sugar content, plantheight, shoot weight and mycorrhizal colonization.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 255–485 · show in text ↑
t0

“sweet sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 251–292 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF alone increased plant height and shoot weight.

Taxon
sweet sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench)Sorghum bicolort0
Treatment
AMF inoculation as a single culturee0
Interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Outcome
plantheight, shoot weighte0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“AMF inoculation as a single cultureincreased carbon assimilation, stomatal conductance,intercellular CO2 concentration, phosphoruscontent, chlorophyll content, sugar content, plantheight, shoot weight and mycorrhizal colonization.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 255–485 · show in text ↑
t0

“sweet sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 251–292 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF alone increased mycorrhizal colonization.

Taxon
sweet sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench)Sorghum bicolort0
Treatment
AMF inoculation as a single culturee0
Interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Outcome
mycorrhizal colonizatione0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“AMF inoculation as a single cultureincreased carbon assimilation, stomatal conductance,intercellular CO2 concentration, phosphoruscontent, chlorophyll content, sugar content, plantheight, shoot weight and mycorrhizal colonization.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 255–485 · show in text ↑
t0

“sweet sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 251–292 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF and rhizobacteria together increased stem sugar content.

Taxon
sweet sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench)Sorghum bicolort0
Treatment
Interaction of AMF and rhizobacteriae0
Interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Second interactor
rhizobacteriaHyphomicrobialese0symbiont
Outcome
sugar content of sweet sorghum stemse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Interaction of AMF and rhizobacteria increasedsugar content of sweet sorghum stems andpotassium content of sweet sorghum leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 485–612 · show in text ↑
t0

“sweet sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 251–292 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF and rhizobacteria together increased leaf potassium content.

Taxon
sweet sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench)Sorghum bicolort0
Treatment
Interaction of AMF and rhizobacteriae0
Interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Second interactor
rhizobacteriaHyphomicrobialese0symbiont
Outcome
potassium content of sweet sorghum leavese0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Interaction of AMF and rhizobacteria increasedsugar content of sweet sorghum stems andpotassium content of sweet sorghum leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 485–612 · show in text ↑
t0

“sweet sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 251–292 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF with chemical fertilizer significantly increased chlorophyll and sugar content.

Taxon
sweet sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench)Sorghum bicolort0
Treatment
interaction with chemical fertilizerse0
Outcome
chlorophyll content, sugarcontente0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“its interaction with chemical fertilizerssignificantly increased chlorophyll content, sugarcontent and mycorrhizal colonization of sorghumplant roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 621–770 · show in text ↑
t0

“sweet sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 251–292 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF with fertilizer significantly increased root mycorrhizal colonization.

Taxon
sweet sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench)Sorghum bicolort0
Treatment
interaction with chemical fertilizerse0
Outcome
mycorrhizal colonization of sorghumplant rootse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“its interaction with chemical fertilizerssignificantly increased chlorophyll content, sugarcontent and mycorrhizal colonization of sorghumplant roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 621–770 · show in text ↑
t0

“sweet sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 251–292 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF, rhizobacteria and fertilizer together increased sugar content.

Taxon
sweet sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench)Sorghum bicolort0
Treatment
Interaction of AMF, rhizobacteria andchemical fertilizerse0
Interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Second interactor
rhizobacteriaHyphomicrobialese0symbiont
Outcome
sugar contente0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Interaction of AMF, rhizobacteria andchemical fertilizers increased sugar content, rootweight and mycorrhizal colonization.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 772–895 · show in text ↑
t0

“sweet sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 251–292 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF, rhizobacteria and fertilizer together increased root weight.

Taxon
sweet sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench)Sorghum bicolort0
Treatment
Interaction of AMF, rhizobacteria andchemical fertilizerse0
Interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Second interactor
rhizobacteriaHyphomicrobialese0symbiont
Outcome
rootweighte0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Interaction of AMF, rhizobacteria andchemical fertilizers increased sugar content, rootweight and mycorrhizal colonization.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 772–895 · show in text ↑
t0

“sweet sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 251–292 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF, rhizobacteria and fertilizer together increased mycorrhizal colonization.

Taxon
sweet sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench)Sorghum bicolort0
Treatment
Interaction of AMF, rhizobacteria andchemical fertilizerse0
Interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Second interactor
rhizobacteriaHyphomicrobialese0symbiont
Outcome
mycorrhizal colonizatione0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Interaction of AMF, rhizobacteria andchemical fertilizers increased sugar content, rootweight and mycorrhizal colonization.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 772–895 · show in text ↑
t0

“sweet sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 251–292 · show in text ↑

inoculation · physiology: pigments · Sorghum bicolor (sorghum)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

mycorrhiza · disease · Sorghum bicolor (sorghum)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

inoculation · disease · Sorghum bicolor (sorghum)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 4 positive, 7 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

mycorrhiza · physiology: pigments · Sorghum bicolor (sorghum)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

fertilization · disease · Sorghum bicolor (sorghum)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

inoculation · quality: sugar starch · Sorghum bicolor (sorghum)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

fertilization · physiology: pigments · Sorghum bicolor (sorghum)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

fertilization · quality: sugar starch · Sorghum bicolor (sorghum)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

8 of 12 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.