Paper · 2023 · Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis

Response of Water Stress and Bacterial Fertilizer Addition to the Structure of Microbial Flora in the Rhizosphere Soil of Grapes Under Delayed Cultivation

Rui Zhang; Jiangqi Wu; Changyu Yang; et al.

7
claims
13
verbatim quotes
6
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The objectives of this study were to reveal the soil microbial structures in the rhizosphere soil of the delayed cultivation and to evaluate the effects of water stress and bacterial fertilizer on major bacteria. The experiment was conducted in 2019 in Yongdeng County, Gansu Province. Three treatments of water regulation were set, including the moderate water stress, mild water stress and adequate water supply treatment with the bacterial fertilizer added at the levels of no addition (0 g), small addition (75 g) and large addition (150 g), respectively. The results showed that the relative abundance of dominant species of soil microorganisms was significantly higher under sufficient water supply and mild water stress treatment than under moderate water stress treament. Under the mild water stress condition, the relative abundance of the most dominant species in each classification level sequentially decreased with the bacterial fertilizer added increasingly. Adding a small amount of bacterial treatment fertilizer to moderate water stress can improve the overall abundance of soil microbial communities during the growth period of new shoots. It was found that Proteobacteria, Bacteroidetes, Gemmatimonadetes, Actinobacteria, Firmicutes, Acidobacteria, Chloroflexi, Planctomycetes, Thaumarchaeota, Verrucomicrobia, and the other bacteria were the major bacterial phyla in the rhizosphere soil of delayed cultivation grapes, among, which Proteobacteria were the most dominant group. Therefore, adding a small amount of bacterial fertilizer under the mild water stress treatment can not only improve the diversity and richness of soil microorganisms during the fruit expansion period, but also significantly save water resources compared with the traditional irrigation regimes.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sufficient water supply and mild stress had higher dominant microbial relative abundance than moderate stress.

Taxon
Grapest0
Treatment
sufficient water supply and mild water stress treatmente0
Outcome
relative abundance of dominant species of soil microorganismse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
moderate water stress treamente0

Verbatim

e0

“relative abundance of dominant species of soil microorganisms was significantly higher under sufficient water supply and mild water stress treatment than under moderate water stress treament”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 588–778 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 122–128 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under mild water stress, increasing bacterial fertilizer lowered dominant species abundance across classification levels.

Taxon
Grapest0
Treatment
bacterial fertilizere0
Outcome
relative abundance of the most dominant species in each classification levele0
Direction
decreasede0
Qualifier
mild water stress conditione0

Verbatim

e0

“Under the mild water stress condition, the relative abundance of the most dominant species in each classification level sequentially decreased with the bacterial fertilizer added increasingly.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 780–972 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 122–128 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A small bacterial fertilizer addition under moderate stress improved overall microbial abundance during new shoot growth.

Taxon
Grapest0
Organ / stage
new shootse0
Treatment
a small amount of bacterial treatment fertilizere0
Outcome
overall abundance of soil microbial communitiese0
Direction
improvee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Adding a small amount of bacterial treatment fertilizer to moderate water stress can improve the overall abundance of soil microbial communities during the growth period of new shoots.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 973–1157 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 122–128 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Proteobacteria were the most dominant bacterial phylum in the grape rhizosphere.

Taxon
Grapest0
Interactor
ProteobacteriaPseudomonadotae0other
Outcome
most dominant groupe0

Verbatim

e0

“Proteobacteria were the most dominant group”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1452–1495 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 122–128 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The rhizosphere contained Proteobacteria, Bacteroidetes, Gemmatimonadetes, Actinobacteria, Firmicutes, Acidobacteria, Chloroflexi, Planctomycetes, Thaumarchaeota and Verrucomicrobia.

Taxon
grapese0
Outcome
major bacterial phyla in the rhizosphere soile0

Verbatim

e0

“Proteobacteria, Bacteroidetes, Gemmatimonadetes, Actinobacteria, Firmicutes, Acidobacteria, Chloroflexi, Planctomycetes, Thaumarchaeota, Verrucomicrobia, and the other bacteria were the major bacterial phyla in the rhizosphere soil of delayed cultivation grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1176–1437 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Small bacterial fertilizer addition under mild stress improved microbial diversity and richness at fruit expansion.

Taxon
Grapest0
Organ / stage
fruit expansion periode0
Treatment
a small amount of bacterial fertilizere0
Outcome
diversity and richness of soil microorganismse0
Direction
improvee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“adding a small amount of bacterial fertilizer under the mild water stress treatment can not only improve the diversity and richness of soil microorganisms during the fruit expansion period”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1508–1696 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 122–128 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Small bacterial fertilizer addition under mild stress saved water relative to traditional irrigation.

Taxon
Grapest0
Treatment
a small amount of bacterial fertilizer under the mild water stress treatmente0
Outcome
water resourcese0
Direction
savee0
Comparator
the traditional irrigation regimese0

Verbatim

e0

“adding a small amount of bacterial fertilizer under the mild water stress treatment can not only improve the diversity and richness of soil microorganisms during the fruit expansion period, but also significantly save water resources compared with the traditional irrigation regimes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1508–1790 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 122–128 · show in text ↑

drought · pest · VitisPositive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

irrigation · pest · VitisPositive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

fertilization · ecology: diversity · VitisResults agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

fertilization · soil: biology · VitisResults agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.