Paper · 2023 · The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences

Management of sucking insect pests of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) with insecticides and their impact on beneficial arthropods

AMBIKA RANI MONDAL; MD RAMIZ UDDIN MIAH; MD YUNUS MIAH; et al.

11
claims
22
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

The present study was carried out at the research field of the Department of Entomology, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman Agricultural University, Gazipur, Bangladesh, during the tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) growing seasons of 2021 and 2022 to evaluate the pest management benefit of 4 insecticides, viz. Karate 2.5 ec (λ-cyhalothrin), Ripcord 10 ec (cypermethrin), Marshal 20 ec (carbosulfan), and Shobicron 425 ec (profenofos Q + cypermethrin) against sucking insect pests (aphids, jassids, whiteflies and thrips) of tomato. The abundance of the sucking pests was significantly lower in the insecticide treated plots compared with the untreated control. During both the years, carbosulfan was the most effective insecticide against aphids (3.1 and 0.8 aphids/3 leaves, respectively), jassids (0.1 and 0.7 jassid/3 leaves, respectively), and thrips (1.9 and 1.1 thrips/3 leaves, respectively), whereas the profenofos Q+ cypermethrin decreased the abundance of whiteflies (1.4 and 2.0 whiteflies/3 leaves, respectively). However, these insecticides had negative effects on the pollinator insect and natural enemies of sucking pests in tomato fields. The insecticide-treated plots showed a significantly lower number of predators and pollinator than the untreated control plots. In the 1st and 2nd years, plots treated with cypermethrin (1.1 predators/plant) and λ-cyhalothrin (1.2 predators/ plant), respectively, showed the highest abundance of predators. Among the insecticide-treated plots, profenofos Q + cypermethrin treated plots showed the highest abundance of pollinator in both years (1st year: 0.7/ plot and 2nd year: 0.9/ plot). Carbosulfan treated plot showed the highest mean yield (58.7 tonnes/ha) with the highest marginal benefit-cost ratio (5.1).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Insecticide treatment significantly reduced sucking pest abundance relative to untreated tomato plots.

Treatment
insecticide treated plotse0
Outcome
abundance of the sucking pestse0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
untreated controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The abundance of the sucking pests was significantly lower in the insecticide treated plots compared with the untreated control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 532–660 · show in text ↑
t0

“Management of sucking insect pests of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) with insecticides and their impact on beneficial arthropods”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–127 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Carbosulfan was the most effective treatment against aphids in both years.

Treatment
carbosulfane0
Interactor
aphidsAphidomorphae0pest
Outcome
aphidse0
Direction
most effectivee0
Value
3.1 and 0.8 aphids/3 leavese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“carbosulfan was the most effective insecticide against aphids (3.1 and 0.8 aphids/3 leaves, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 684–789 · show in text ↑
t0

“Management of sucking insect pests of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) with insecticides and their impact on beneficial arthropods”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–127 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Carbosulfan was the most effective treatment against jassids in both years.

Treatment
carbosulfane0
Interactor
jassidse0pest
Outcome
jassidse0
Direction
most effectivee0
Value
0.1 and 0.7 jassid/3 leavese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“carbosulfan was the most effective insecticide against aphids (3.1 and 0.8 aphids/3 leaves, respectively), jassids (0.1 and 0.7 jassid/3 leaves, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 684–842 · show in text ↑
t0

“Management of sucking insect pests of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) with insecticides and their impact on beneficial arthropods”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–127 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Carbosulfan was the most effective treatment against thrips in both years.

Treatment
carbosulfane0
Interactor
thripsThripse0pest
Outcome
thripse0
Direction
most effectivee0
Value
1.9 and 1.1 thrips/3 leavese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Thrips
Thrips · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Alton N. Sparks, Jr., University of Georgia, Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“carbosulfan was the most effective insecticide against aphids (3.1 and 0.8 aphids/3 leaves, respectively), jassids (0.1 and 0.7 jassid/3 leaves, respectively), and thrips (1.9 and 1.1 thrips/3 leaves, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 684–898 · show in text ↑
t0

“Management of sucking insect pests of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) with insecticides and their impact on beneficial arthropods”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–127 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Profenofos plus cypermethrin reduced whitefly abundance in both years.

Treatment
profenofos Q+ cypermethrine0
Interactor
whitefliesAleyrodoideae0pest
Outcome
abundance of whitefliese0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
1.4 and 2.0 whiteflies/3 leavese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“profenofos Q+ cypermethrin decreased the abundance of whiteflies (1.4 and 2.0 whiteflies/3 leaves, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 912–1024 · show in text ↑
t0

“Management of sucking insect pests of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) with insecticides and their impact on beneficial arthropods”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–127 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Insecticide-treated plots had significantly fewer predators and pollinators than controls.

Treatment
insecticide-treated plotse0
Interactor
pollinatore0pollinator
Outcome
number of predators and pollinatore0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
untreated control plotse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The insecticide-treated plots showed a significantly lower number of predators and pollinator than the untreated control plots.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1155–1282 · show in text ↑
t0

“Management of sucking insect pests of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) with insecticides and their impact on beneficial arthropods”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–127 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cypermethrin-treated plots had the highest predator abundance in the first year.

Treatment
cypermethrine0
Outcome
abundance of predatorse0
Direction
higheste0
Value
1.1 predators/plante0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“plots treated with cypermethrin (1.1 predators/plant) and λ-cyhalothrin (1.2 predators/ plant), respectively, showed the highest abundance of predators”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1309–1460 · show in text ↑
t0

“Management of sucking insect pests of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) with insecticides and their impact on beneficial arthropods”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–127 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lambda-cyhalothrin-treated plots had the highest predator abundance in the second year.

Treatment
λ-cyhalothrine0
Outcome
abundance of predatorse0
Direction
higheste0
Value
1.2 predators/ plante0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“plots treated with cypermethrin (1.1 predators/plant) and λ-cyhalothrin (1.2 predators/ plant), respectively, showed the highest abundance of predators”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1309–1460 · show in text ↑
t0

“Management of sucking insect pests of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) with insecticides and their impact on beneficial arthropods”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–127 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Profenofos plus cypermethrin plots had the highest pollinator abundance among insecticide treatments in both years.

Treatment
profenofos Q + cypermethrine0
Interactor
pollinatore0pollinator
Outcome
abundance of pollinatore0
Direction
higheste0
Value
1st year: 0.7/ plot and 2nd year: 0.9/ plote0
Comparator
insecticide-treated plotse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Among the insecticide-treated plots, profenofos Q + cypermethrin treated plots showed the highest abundance of pollinator in both years (1st year: 0.7/ plot and 2nd year: 0.9/ plot).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1462–1644 · show in text ↑
t0

“Management of sucking insect pests of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) with insecticides and their impact on beneficial arthropods”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–127 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Carbosulfan-treated plots had the highest tomato yield.

Treatment
Carbosulfane0
Outcome
mean yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
58.7 tonnes/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Carbosulfan treated plot showed the highest mean yield (58.7 tonnes/ha) with the highest marginal benefit-cost ratio (5.1).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1645–1768 · show in text ↑
t0

“Management of sucking insect pests of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) with insecticides and their impact on beneficial arthropods”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–127 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Carbosulfan-treated plots had the highest marginal benefit-cost ratio.

Treatment
Carbosulfane0
Outcome
marginal benefit-cost ratioe0
Direction
higheste0
Value
5.1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Carbosulfan treated plot showed the highest mean yield (58.7 tonnes/ha) with the highest marginal benefit-cost ratio (5.1).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1645–1768 · show in text ↑
t0

“Management of sucking insect pests of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) with insecticides and their impact on beneficial arthropods”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–127 · show in text ↑

cypermethrin · pest · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

profenofos · pest · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

lambda-cyhalothrin · pest · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

insecticide · pest · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

45 papers: 36 positive, 9 negative or no effect

35 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

41 papers more in this group

See all 45 papers →

insecticide · ecology: diversity · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.