Paper · 1996 · Madras Agricultural Journal

WATER AND NITROGEN MANAGEMENT FOR LOWLAND TRANSPLANTED RICE UNDER LIMITED WATER SUPPLY

WAHAB K; VEERABADRAN V; SRINIVASAN K

5
claims
7
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Under conditions of limited water supply, intermittent irrigation instead of continuous flooding is necessitated in rice cultivation. To assess the response of lowland transplanted rice to intermittent irrigation vis-a-vis continuous submergence, field experiments were conducted at the Agricultural College, Killikulam during rubi seasons (Oct-Feb) of 1990 and 1991. The effect of partial substitution of inorganic nitrogen through bio fertilizers-azolla and blue green algae (BGA) - was also evaluated. The results indicated that rice yield was reduced by 3 to 19 per cent by intermittent irrigation compared to continuous submergence. The practice of irrigation immediately after disapperance of ponded water was most suitable under limited water supply. With this practice, the yield reduction was only marginal (3-5%) but it helped to save about 28.7 per cent of irrigation water compared to continuous submergence. Substitution of 25 per cent of inorganic nitrogen through inoculation of azolla or BGA maintained the grain yield of rice on par with the application of 100 per cent of N through inorganic fertilizers.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intermittent irrigation reduced rice yield by 3 to 19 per cent versus continuous submergence.

Treatment
intermittent irrigatione0
Outcome
rice yielde0
Direction
reducede0
Value
3 to 19 per cente0
Comparator
continuous submergencee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“rice yield was reduced by 3 to 19 per cent by intermittent irrigation compared to continuous submergence.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 532–637 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigating after ponded water disappeared limited yield reduction to 3-5%.

Treatment
irrigation immediately after disapperance of ponded watere0
Outcome
yield reductione0
Direction
reductione0
Value
3-5%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The practice of irrigation immediately after disapperance of ponded water was most suitable under limited water supply. With this practice, the yield reduction was only marginal (3-5%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 638–822 · show in text ↑
t0

“RICE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–59 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same irrigation practice saved about 28.7 per cent of irrigation water versus continuous submergence.

Treatment
irrigation immediately after disapperance of ponded watere0
Outcome
irrigation watere0
Direction
savee0
Value
28.7 per cente0
Comparator
continuous submergencee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The practice of irrigation immediately after disapperance of ponded water was most suitable under limited water supply. With this practice, the yield reduction was only marginal (3-5%) but it helped to save about 28.7 per cent of irrigation water compared to continuous submergence.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 638–920 · show in text ↑
t0

“RICE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–59 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Replacing 25 per cent of inorganic N using azolla inoculation maintained grain yield on par with full inorganic N.

Treatment
Substitution of 25 per cent of inorganic nitrogen through inoculation of azollae0
Interactor
azollaAzollae0symbiont
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
on pare0
Comparator
application of 100 per cent of N through inorganic fertilizerse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azolla
Azolla · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryVis M · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Substitution of 25 per cent of inorganic nitrogen through inoculation of azolla or BGA maintained the grain yield of rice on par with the application of 100 per cent of N through inorganic fertilizers.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 921–1122 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Replacing 25 per cent of inorganic N using BGA inoculation maintained grain yield on par with full inorganic N.

Treatment
Substitution of 25 per cent of inorganic nitrogen through inoculation of azolla or BGAe0
Interactor
BGAe0symbiont
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
on pare0
Comparator
application of 100 per cent of N through inorganic fertilizerse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Substitution of 25 per cent of inorganic nitrogen through inoculation of azolla or BGA maintained the grain yield of rice on par with the application of 100 per cent of N through inorganic fertilizers.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 921–1122 · show in text ↑

Cyanobacteriota · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

33 papers: 32 positive, 1 negative or no effect

32 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

29 papers more in this group

See all 33 papers →

inoculation · Azolla · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

irrigation · physiology: water · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

380 papers: 350 positive, 30 negative or no effect

349 papers in the same direction as this paper · 25 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

376 papers more in this group

See all 380 papers →

inoculation · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

418 papers: 382 positive, 36 negative or no effect

35 papers in the same direction as this paper · 382 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

414 papers more in this group

See all 418 papers →

irrigation · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

1,171 papers: 906 positive, 265 negative or no effect

264 papers in the same direction as this paper · 906 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1,167 papers more in this group

See all 1,171 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

2,045 papers: 1,803 positive, 242 negative or no effect

241 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1,803 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2,041 papers more in this group

See all 2,045 papers →

nitrogen · Azolla · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.