Paper · 2002 · Egyptian journal of phycology

AZOLLA AND CYANOBACTERIA AS POSSIBLE NITROGEN BIOFERTILIZER SOURCE IN RICE PRODUCTION

Sanaa Mussa; S.T. Tantawy; F. Ghazal

11
claims
20
verbatim quotes
2
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A greenhouse experiment was carried out to study the effect of Azolla and /or cyanobacteria inoculation each alone or in combination with chemical nitrogen fertilizer (urea) on rice growth and yield production. Slightly higher rice yield observed in cyanobacteria (SBI) inoculated plots were not significantly different from corresponding non- inoculated treatments. Applying 60 kg Nha-l as urea or as Azolla had similar effect on grain yield. Highest yield was obtained with the combination of 30 kg Nha-l as urea and 30 kg Nha-l as Azolla. This value was not significantly different from the values obtained with 60 kg Nha-l as urea but was significantly higher than that obtained with 60 kg Nha-l as Azolla. Azolla and / or cyanobacteria did not affect the rice harvest index . The nitrogen use efficiency decreased with increasing nitrogen level. The highest plant nitrogen uptake was recorded when Azolla mixed with urea at 30 kg Nha-l each. Results show that Azolla application alone or in combination with urea is more beneficial to rice than inoculation with cyanobacteria. Azolla also increased significantly the soil organic carbon content.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cyanobacterial inoculation slightly raised rice yield, without a significant difference from non-inoculated treatments.

Treatment
cyanobacteria (SBI) inoculatede0
Interactor
cyanobacteriaCyanobacteriotae0symbiont
Outcome
rice yielde0
Direction
Slightly highere0
Comparator
non- inoculated treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Slightly higher rice yield observed in cyanobacteria (SBI) inoculated plots were not significantly different from corresponding non- inoculated treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 211–366 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Applying 60 kg Nha-l as urea or Azolla had similar effects on rice grain yield.

Treatment
60 kg Nha-l as ureae0
Interactor
AzollaAzollae0symbiont
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
similar effecte0
Comparator
as Azollae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azolla
Azolla · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryVis M · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Applying 60 kg Nha-l as urea or as Azolla had similar effect on grain yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 367–443 · show in text ↑
e1

“on rice growth and yield production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 174–209 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined 30 kg Nha-l urea and 30 kg Nha-l Azolla treatment gave the highest rice yield.

Treatment
combination of 30 kg Nha-l as urea and 30 kg Nha-l as Azollae0
Interactor
AzollaAzollae0symbiont
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
Higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azolla
Azolla · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryVis M · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Highest yield was obtained with the combination of 30 kg Nha-l as urea and 30 kg Nha-l as Azolla.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 444–541 · show in text ↑
e1

“on rice growth and yield production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 174–209 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield under combined urea and Azolla was not significantly different from 60 kg Nha-l urea alone.

Treatment
combination of 30 kg Nha-l as urea and 30 kg Nha-l as Azollae1
Interactor
AzollaAzollae1symbiont
Outcome
yielde2
Direction
not significantly differente0
Comparator
60 kg Nha-l as ureae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azolla
Azolla · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryVis M · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This value was not significantly different from the values obtained with 60 kg Nha-l as urea but was significantly higher than that obtained with 60 kg Nha-l as Azolla.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 542–710 · show in text ↑
e1

“combination of 30 kg Nha-l as urea and 30 kg Nha-l as Azolla”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 480–540 · show in text ↑
e2

“rice growth and yield production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 177–209 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield under combined urea and Azolla was significantly higher than under 60 kg Nha-l Azolla alone.

Treatment
combination of 30 kg Nha-l as urea and 30 kg Nha-l as Azollae1
Interactor
AzollaAzollae1symbiont
Outcome
yielde2
Direction
highere0
Comparator
60 kg Nha-l as Azollae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azolla
Azolla · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryVis M · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This value was not significantly different from the values obtained with 60 kg Nha-l as urea but was significantly higher than that obtained with 60 kg Nha-l as Azolla.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 542–710 · show in text ↑
e1

“combination of 30 kg Nha-l as urea and 30 kg Nha-l as Azolla”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 480–540 · show in text ↑
e2

“rice growth and yield production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 177–209 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Azolla did not affect rice harvest index.

Treatment
Azollae0
Interactor
AzollaAzollae0symbiont
Outcome
rice harvest indexe0
Direction
did not affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azolla
Azolla · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryVis M · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Azolla and / or cyanobacteria did not affect the rice harvest index .”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 711–780 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cyanobacteria did not affect rice harvest index.

Treatment
cyanobacteriae0
Interactor
cyanobacteriaCyanobacteriotae0symbiont
Outcome
rice harvest indexe0
Direction
did not affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Azolla and / or cyanobacteria did not affect the rice harvest index .”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 711–780 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice nitrogen use efficiency decreased as nitrogen level increased.

Treatment
increasing nitrogen levele0
Outcome
nitrogen use efficiencye0
Direction
decreasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The nitrogen use efficiency decreased with increasing nitrogen level.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 781–850 · show in text ↑
e1

“rice growth and yield production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 177–209 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest rice plant nitrogen uptake occurred with Azolla and urea at 30 kg Nha-l each.

Treatment
Azolla mixed with urea at 30 kg Nha-l eache0
Interactor
AzollaAzollae0symbiont
Outcome
plant nitrogen uptakee0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azolla
Azolla · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryVis M · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest plant nitrogen uptake was recorded when Azolla mixed with urea at 30 kg Nha-l each.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 851–946 · show in text ↑
e1

“rice growth and yield production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 177–209 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors considered Azolla alone or with urea more beneficial to rice than cyanobacterial inoculation.

Treatment
Azolla application alone or in combination with ureae0
Interactor
AzollaAzollae0symbiont
Second interactor
cyanobacteriaCyanobacteriotae0symbiont
Outcome
more beneficiale0
Comparator
inoculation with cyanobacteriae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azolla
Azolla · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryVis M · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Azolla application alone or in combination with urea is more beneficial to rice than inoculation with cyanobacteria.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 965–1081 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Azolla significantly increased soil organic carbon content.

Treatment
Azollae0
Interactor
AzollaAzollae0symbiont
Outcome
soil organic carbon contente0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azolla
Azolla · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryVis M · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Azolla also increased significantly the soil organic carbon content.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1082–1150 · show in text ↑
e1

“on rice growth and yield production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 174–209 · show in text ↑

Cyanobacteriota · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

33 papers: 32 positive, 1 negative or no effect

31 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

29 papers more in this group

See all 33 papers →

Azolla · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

47 papers: 43 positive, 4 negative or no effect

42 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

43 papers more in this group

See all 47 papers →

Azolla · soil: chemistry · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Azolla · nutrient: content · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

14 papers: 14 positive, 0 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

inoculation · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

418 papers: 382 positive, 36 negative or no effect

381 papers in the same direction as this paper · 31 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

414 papers more in this group

See all 418 papers →

nitrogen · nutrient: content · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

464 papers: 409 positive, 55 negative or no effect

408 papers in the same direction as this paper · 52 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

460 papers more in this group

See all 464 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

2,045 papers: 1,803 positive, 242 negative or no effect

1,802 papers in the same direction as this paper · 193 in the opposite direction · 49 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

2,041 papers more in this group

See all 2,045 papers →

nitrogen · Azolla · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.