Paper · 2022 · Annals of Horticulture

Influence of Organic Manures and Biofertilizers on Growth and Flowering Behavior of Tuberose (Polianthus tuberosa L.) cv. Prajwal

Ritu Yadav; B. S. Beniwal; R.P.S. Dalal; et al.

16
claims
44
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The experiment was perform in pots in completely randomized design (CRD) with 11treatments having four replications to study the response of organic manures, chemicalfertilizers and biofertilizers on growth and flower yield of tuberose (Polianthes tuberosa L.) cv. Prajwal. The treatment containing sand + vermicompost (4:1) + Biofertilizers (Azotobacter & Pseudomonas sp.) was significantly superior in terms of plant height (70.50cm), length of leaf(36.98cm), Number of leaf (25.67), spike length (66.58cm), rachis length (27.23cm), diameter ofstem (1.096cm),florets number per spike (35), number of opened florets per spike (33.67), spikesnumber per clump, spike weight (75.33g), bulb number per clump (21), bulb diameter (1.20cm),bulb weight (3.98g). While lowest values of these parameters were observe in control (sand).Minimum days taken to bulb sprouting( 21.75days), days taken to complete bulb sprouting(24.50days), days taken to spike emergence (93days) and days taken to opening of first floret(106.75days) was observed in sand + inorganic manures.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 16

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

sand + vermicompost (4:1) + Biofertilizers (Azotobacter & Pseudomonas sp.) was significantly superior for plant height (70.50cm) in tuberose.

Taxon
TuberoseAgave amicat0
Material
Prajwalt0
Treatment
sand + vermicompost (4:1) + Biofertilizers (Azotobacter & Pseudomonas sp.)e0
Interactor
AzotobacterAzotobactere0symbiont
Second interactor
Pseudomonas sp.Pseudomonase0symbiont
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
significantly superiore0
Value
70.50cme0
Comparator
control (sand)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Agave amica
Agave amica · TaxonSKsiddhartthan · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azotobacter
Azotobacter · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)DAN H. JONES · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas
Pseudomonas · Second interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)CDC · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The treatment containing sand + vermicompost (4:1) + Biofertilizers (Azotobacter & Pseudomonas sp.) was significantly superior in terms of plant height (70.50cm), length of leaf(36.98cm), Number of leaf (25.67), spike length (66.58cm), rachis length (27.23cm), diameter ofstem (1.096cm),florets number per spike (35), number of opened florets per spike (33.67), spikesnumber per clump, spike weight (75.33g), bulb number per clump (21), bulb diameter (1.20cm),bulb weight (3.98g).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 274–754 · show in text ↑
e1

“While lowest values of these parameters were observe in control (sand).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 755–826 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tuberose (Polianthus tuberosa L.) cv. Prajwal”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–129 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

sand + vermicompost (4:1) + Biofertilizers (Azotobacter & Pseudomonas sp.) was significantly superior for length of leaf (36.98cm) in tuberose.

Taxon
TuberoseAgave amicat0
Material
Prajwalt0
Treatment
sand + vermicompost (4:1) + Biofertilizers (Azotobacter & Pseudomonas sp.)e0
Interactor
AzotobacterAzotobactere0symbiont
Second interactor
Pseudomonas sp.Pseudomonase0symbiont
Outcome
length of leafe0
Direction
significantly superiore0
Value
36.98cme0
Comparator
control (sand)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Agave amica
Agave amica · TaxonSKsiddhartthan · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azotobacter
Azotobacter · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)DAN H. JONES · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas
Pseudomonas · Second interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)CDC · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The treatment containing sand + vermicompost (4:1) + Biofertilizers (Azotobacter & Pseudomonas sp.) was significantly superior in terms of plant height (70.50cm), length of leaf(36.98cm), Number of leaf (25.67), spike length (66.58cm), rachis length (27.23cm), diameter ofstem (1.096cm),florets number per spike (35), number of opened florets per spike (33.67), spikesnumber per clump, spike weight (75.33g), bulb number per clump (21), bulb diameter (1.20cm),bulb weight (3.98g).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 274–754 · show in text ↑
e1

“While lowest values of these parameters were observe in control (sand).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 755–826 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tuberose (Polianthus tuberosa L.) cv. Prajwal”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–129 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

sand + vermicompost (4:1) + Biofertilizers (Azotobacter & Pseudomonas sp.) was significantly superior for Number of leaf (25.67) in tuberose.

Taxon
TuberoseAgave amicat0
Material
Prajwalt0
Treatment
sand + vermicompost (4:1) + Biofertilizers (Azotobacter & Pseudomonas sp.)e0
Interactor
AzotobacterAzotobactere0symbiont
Second interactor
Pseudomonas sp.Pseudomonase0symbiont
Outcome
Number of leafe0
Direction
significantly superiore0
Value
25.67e0
Comparator
control (sand)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Agave amica
Agave amica · TaxonSKsiddhartthan · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azotobacter
Azotobacter · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)DAN H. JONES · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas
Pseudomonas · Second interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)CDC · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The treatment containing sand + vermicompost (4:1) + Biofertilizers (Azotobacter & Pseudomonas sp.) was significantly superior in terms of plant height (70.50cm), length of leaf(36.98cm), Number of leaf (25.67), spike length (66.58cm), rachis length (27.23cm), diameter ofstem (1.096cm),florets number per spike (35), number of opened florets per spike (33.67), spikesnumber per clump, spike weight (75.33g), bulb number per clump (21), bulb diameter (1.20cm),bulb weight (3.98g).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 274–754 · show in text ↑
e1

“While lowest values of these parameters were observe in control (sand).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 755–826 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tuberose (Polianthus tuberosa L.) cv. Prajwal”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–129 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

sand + vermicompost (4:1) + Biofertilizers (Azotobacter & Pseudomonas sp.) was significantly superior for spike length (66.58cm) in tuberose.

Taxon
TuberoseAgave amicat0
Material
Prajwalt0
Treatment
sand + vermicompost (4:1) + Biofertilizers (Azotobacter & Pseudomonas sp.)e0
Interactor
AzotobacterAzotobactere0symbiont
Second interactor
Pseudomonas sp.Pseudomonase0symbiont
Outcome
spike lengthe0
Direction
significantly superiore0
Value
66.58cme0
Comparator
control (sand)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Agave amica
Agave amica · TaxonSKsiddhartthan · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azotobacter
Azotobacter · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)DAN H. JONES · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas
Pseudomonas · Second interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)CDC · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The treatment containing sand + vermicompost (4:1) + Biofertilizers (Azotobacter & Pseudomonas sp.) was significantly superior in terms of plant height (70.50cm), length of leaf(36.98cm), Number of leaf (25.67), spike length (66.58cm), rachis length (27.23cm), diameter ofstem (1.096cm),florets number per spike (35), number of opened florets per spike (33.67), spikesnumber per clump, spike weight (75.33g), bulb number per clump (21), bulb diameter (1.20cm),bulb weight (3.98g).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 274–754 · show in text ↑
e1

“While lowest values of these parameters were observe in control (sand).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 755–826 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tuberose (Polianthus tuberosa L.) cv. Prajwal”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–129 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

sand + vermicompost (4:1) + Biofertilizers (Azotobacter & Pseudomonas sp.) was significantly superior for rachis length (27.23cm) in tuberose.

Taxon
TuberoseAgave amicat0
Material
Prajwalt0
Treatment
sand + vermicompost (4:1) + Biofertilizers (Azotobacter & Pseudomonas sp.)e0
Interactor
AzotobacterAzotobactere0symbiont
Second interactor
Pseudomonas sp.Pseudomonase0symbiont
Outcome
rachis lengthe0
Direction
significantly superiore0
Value
27.23cme0
Comparator
control (sand)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Agave amica
Agave amica · TaxonSKsiddhartthan · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azotobacter
Azotobacter · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)DAN H. JONES · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas
Pseudomonas · Second interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)CDC · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The treatment containing sand + vermicompost (4:1) + Biofertilizers (Azotobacter & Pseudomonas sp.) was significantly superior in terms of plant height (70.50cm), length of leaf(36.98cm), Number of leaf (25.67), spike length (66.58cm), rachis length (27.23cm), diameter ofstem (1.096cm),florets number per spike (35), number of opened florets per spike (33.67), spikesnumber per clump, spike weight (75.33g), bulb number per clump (21), bulb diameter (1.20cm),bulb weight (3.98g).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 274–754 · show in text ↑
e1

“While lowest values of these parameters were observe in control (sand).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 755–826 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tuberose (Polianthus tuberosa L.) cv. Prajwal”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–129 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

sand + vermicompost (4:1) + Biofertilizers (Azotobacter & Pseudomonas sp.) was significantly superior for diameter ofstem (1.096cm) in tuberose.

Taxon
TuberoseAgave amicat0
Material
Prajwalt0
Treatment
sand + vermicompost (4:1) + Biofertilizers (Azotobacter & Pseudomonas sp.)e0
Interactor
AzotobacterAzotobactere0symbiont
Second interactor
Pseudomonas sp.Pseudomonase0symbiont
Outcome
diameter ofsteme0
Direction
significantly superiore0
Value
1.096cme0
Comparator
control (sand)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Agave amica
Agave amica · TaxonSKsiddhartthan · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azotobacter
Azotobacter · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)DAN H. JONES · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas
Pseudomonas · Second interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)CDC · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The treatment containing sand + vermicompost (4:1) + Biofertilizers (Azotobacter & Pseudomonas sp.) was significantly superior in terms of plant height (70.50cm), length of leaf(36.98cm), Number of leaf (25.67), spike length (66.58cm), rachis length (27.23cm), diameter ofstem (1.096cm),florets number per spike (35), number of opened florets per spike (33.67), spikesnumber per clump, spike weight (75.33g), bulb number per clump (21), bulb diameter (1.20cm),bulb weight (3.98g).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 274–754 · show in text ↑
e1

“While lowest values of these parameters were observe in control (sand).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 755–826 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tuberose (Polianthus tuberosa L.) cv. Prajwal”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–129 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

sand + vermicompost (4:1) + Biofertilizers (Azotobacter & Pseudomonas sp.) was significantly superior for florets number per spike (35) in tuberose.

Taxon
TuberoseAgave amicat0
Material
Prajwalt0
Treatment
sand + vermicompost (4:1) + Biofertilizers (Azotobacter & Pseudomonas sp.)e0
Interactor
AzotobacterAzotobactere0symbiont
Second interactor
Pseudomonas sp.Pseudomonase0symbiont
Outcome
florets number per spikee0
Direction
significantly superiore0
Value
35e0
Comparator
control (sand)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Agave amica
Agave amica · TaxonSKsiddhartthan · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azotobacter
Azotobacter · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)DAN H. JONES · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas
Pseudomonas · Second interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)CDC · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The treatment containing sand + vermicompost (4:1) + Biofertilizers (Azotobacter & Pseudomonas sp.) was significantly superior in terms of plant height (70.50cm), length of leaf(36.98cm), Number of leaf (25.67), spike length (66.58cm), rachis length (27.23cm), diameter ofstem (1.096cm),florets number per spike (35), number of opened florets per spike (33.67), spikesnumber per clump, spike weight (75.33g), bulb number per clump (21), bulb diameter (1.20cm),bulb weight (3.98g).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 274–754 · show in text ↑
e1

“While lowest values of these parameters were observe in control (sand).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 755–826 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tuberose (Polianthus tuberosa L.) cv. Prajwal”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–129 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

sand + vermicompost (4:1) + Biofertilizers (Azotobacter & Pseudomonas sp.) was significantly superior for number of opened florets per spike (33.67) in tuberose.

Taxon
TuberoseAgave amicat0
Material
Prajwalt0
Treatment
sand + vermicompost (4:1) + Biofertilizers (Azotobacter & Pseudomonas sp.)e0
Interactor
AzotobacterAzotobactere0symbiont
Second interactor
Pseudomonas sp.Pseudomonase0symbiont
Outcome
number of opened florets per spikee0
Direction
significantly superiore0
Value
33.67e0
Comparator
control (sand)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Agave amica
Agave amica · TaxonSKsiddhartthan · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azotobacter
Azotobacter · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)DAN H. JONES · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas
Pseudomonas · Second interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)CDC · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The treatment containing sand + vermicompost (4:1) + Biofertilizers (Azotobacter & Pseudomonas sp.) was significantly superior in terms of plant height (70.50cm), length of leaf(36.98cm), Number of leaf (25.67), spike length (66.58cm), rachis length (27.23cm), diameter ofstem (1.096cm),florets number per spike (35), number of opened florets per spike (33.67), spikesnumber per clump, spike weight (75.33g), bulb number per clump (21), bulb diameter (1.20cm),bulb weight (3.98g).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 274–754 · show in text ↑
e1

“While lowest values of these parameters were observe in control (sand).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 755–826 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tuberose (Polianthus tuberosa L.) cv. Prajwal”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–129 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

sand + vermicompost (4:1) + Biofertilizers (Azotobacter & Pseudomonas sp.) was significantly superior for spike weight (75.33g) in tuberose.

Taxon
TuberoseAgave amicat0
Material
Prajwalt0
Treatment
sand + vermicompost (4:1) + Biofertilizers (Azotobacter & Pseudomonas sp.)e0
Interactor
AzotobacterAzotobactere0symbiont
Second interactor
Pseudomonas sp.Pseudomonase0symbiont
Outcome
spike weighte0
Direction
significantly superiore0
Value
75.33ge0
Comparator
control (sand)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Agave amica
Agave amica · TaxonSKsiddhartthan · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azotobacter
Azotobacter · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)DAN H. JONES · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas
Pseudomonas · Second interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)CDC · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The treatment containing sand + vermicompost (4:1) + Biofertilizers (Azotobacter & Pseudomonas sp.) was significantly superior in terms of plant height (70.50cm), length of leaf(36.98cm), Number of leaf (25.67), spike length (66.58cm), rachis length (27.23cm), diameter ofstem (1.096cm),florets number per spike (35), number of opened florets per spike (33.67), spikesnumber per clump, spike weight (75.33g), bulb number per clump (21), bulb diameter (1.20cm),bulb weight (3.98g).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 274–754 · show in text ↑
e1

“While lowest values of these parameters were observe in control (sand).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 755–826 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tuberose (Polianthus tuberosa L.) cv. Prajwal”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–129 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

sand + vermicompost (4:1) + Biofertilizers (Azotobacter & Pseudomonas sp.) was significantly superior for bulb number per clump (21) in tuberose.

Taxon
TuberoseAgave amicat0
Material
Prajwalt0
Treatment
sand + vermicompost (4:1) + Biofertilizers (Azotobacter & Pseudomonas sp.)e0
Interactor
AzotobacterAzotobactere0symbiont
Second interactor
Pseudomonas sp.Pseudomonase0symbiont
Outcome
bulb number per clumpe0
Direction
significantly superiore0
Value
21e0
Comparator
control (sand)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Agave amica
Agave amica · TaxonSKsiddhartthan · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azotobacter
Azotobacter · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)DAN H. JONES · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas
Pseudomonas · Second interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)CDC · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The treatment containing sand + vermicompost (4:1) + Biofertilizers (Azotobacter & Pseudomonas sp.) was significantly superior in terms of plant height (70.50cm), length of leaf(36.98cm), Number of leaf (25.67), spike length (66.58cm), rachis length (27.23cm), diameter ofstem (1.096cm),florets number per spike (35), number of opened florets per spike (33.67), spikesnumber per clump, spike weight (75.33g), bulb number per clump (21), bulb diameter (1.20cm),bulb weight (3.98g).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 274–754 · show in text ↑
e1

“While lowest values of these parameters were observe in control (sand).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 755–826 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tuberose (Polianthus tuberosa L.) cv. Prajwal”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–129 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

sand + vermicompost (4:1) + Biofertilizers (Azotobacter & Pseudomonas sp.) was significantly superior for bulb diameter (1.20cm) in tuberose.

Taxon
TuberoseAgave amicat0
Material
Prajwalt0
Treatment
sand + vermicompost (4:1) + Biofertilizers (Azotobacter & Pseudomonas sp.)e0
Interactor
AzotobacterAzotobactere0symbiont
Second interactor
Pseudomonas sp.Pseudomonase0symbiont
Outcome
bulb diametere0
Direction
significantly superiore0
Value
1.20cme0
Comparator
control (sand)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Agave amica
Agave amica · TaxonSKsiddhartthan · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azotobacter
Azotobacter · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)DAN H. JONES · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas
Pseudomonas · Second interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)CDC · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The treatment containing sand + vermicompost (4:1) + Biofertilizers (Azotobacter & Pseudomonas sp.) was significantly superior in terms of plant height (70.50cm), length of leaf(36.98cm), Number of leaf (25.67), spike length (66.58cm), rachis length (27.23cm), diameter ofstem (1.096cm),florets number per spike (35), number of opened florets per spike (33.67), spikesnumber per clump, spike weight (75.33g), bulb number per clump (21), bulb diameter (1.20cm),bulb weight (3.98g).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 274–754 · show in text ↑
e1

“While lowest values of these parameters were observe in control (sand).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 755–826 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tuberose (Polianthus tuberosa L.) cv. Prajwal”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–129 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

sand + vermicompost (4:1) + Biofertilizers (Azotobacter & Pseudomonas sp.) was significantly superior for bulb weight (3.98g) in tuberose.

Taxon
TuberoseAgave amicat0
Material
Prajwalt0
Treatment
sand + vermicompost (4:1) + Biofertilizers (Azotobacter & Pseudomonas sp.)e0
Interactor
AzotobacterAzotobactere0symbiont
Second interactor
Pseudomonas sp.Pseudomonase0symbiont
Outcome
bulb weighte0
Direction
significantly superiore0
Value
3.98ge0
Comparator
control (sand)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Agave amica
Agave amica · TaxonSKsiddhartthan · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azotobacter
Azotobacter · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)DAN H. JONES · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas
Pseudomonas · Second interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)CDC · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The treatment containing sand + vermicompost (4:1) + Biofertilizers (Azotobacter & Pseudomonas sp.) was significantly superior in terms of plant height (70.50cm), length of leaf(36.98cm), Number of leaf (25.67), spike length (66.58cm), rachis length (27.23cm), diameter ofstem (1.096cm),florets number per spike (35), number of opened florets per spike (33.67), spikesnumber per clump, spike weight (75.33g), bulb number per clump (21), bulb diameter (1.20cm),bulb weight (3.98g).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 274–754 · show in text ↑
e1

“While lowest values of these parameters were observe in control (sand).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 755–826 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tuberose (Polianthus tuberosa L.) cv. Prajwal”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–129 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sand plus inorganic manures gave the minimum days taken to bulb sprouting (21.75days) in tuberose.

Taxon
tuberoseAgave amicat0
Material
Prajwalt0
Treatment
sand + inorganic manurese0
Outcome
days taken to bulb sproutinge0
Direction
Minimume0
Value
21.75dayse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Agave amica
Agave amica · TaxonSKsiddhartthan · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Minimum days taken to bulb sprouting( 21.75days), days taken to complete bulb sprouting(24.50days), days taken to spike emergence (93days) and days taken to opening of first floret(106.75days) was observed in sand + inorganic manures.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 826–1060 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tuberose (Polianthus tuberosa L.) cv. Prajwal”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–129 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sand plus inorganic manures gave the minimum days taken to complete bulb sprouting (24.50days) in tuberose.

Taxon
tuberoseAgave amicat0
Material
Prajwalt0
Treatment
sand + inorganic manurese0
Outcome
days taken to complete bulb sproutinge0
Direction
Minimume0
Value
24.50dayse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Agave amica
Agave amica · TaxonSKsiddhartthan · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Minimum days taken to bulb sprouting( 21.75days), days taken to complete bulb sprouting(24.50days), days taken to spike emergence (93days) and days taken to opening of first floret(106.75days) was observed in sand + inorganic manures.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 826–1060 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tuberose (Polianthus tuberosa L.) cv. Prajwal”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–129 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sand plus inorganic manures gave the minimum days taken to spike emergence (93days) in tuberose.

Taxon
tuberoseAgave amicat0
Material
Prajwalt0
Treatment
sand + inorganic manurese0
Outcome
days taken to spike emergencee0
Direction
Minimume0
Value
93dayse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Agave amica
Agave amica · TaxonSKsiddhartthan · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Minimum days taken to bulb sprouting( 21.75days), days taken to complete bulb sprouting(24.50days), days taken to spike emergence (93days) and days taken to opening of first floret(106.75days) was observed in sand + inorganic manures.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 826–1060 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tuberose (Polianthus tuberosa L.) cv. Prajwal”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–129 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sand plus inorganic manures gave the minimum days taken to opening of first floret (106.75days) in tuberose.

Taxon
tuberoseAgave amicat0
Material
Prajwalt0
Treatment
sand + inorganic manurese0
Outcome
days taken to opening of first florete0
Direction
Minimume0
Value
106.75dayse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Agave amica
Agave amica · TaxonSKsiddhartthan · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Minimum days taken to bulb sprouting( 21.75days), days taken to complete bulb sprouting(24.50days), days taken to spike emergence (93days) and days taken to opening of first floret(106.75days) was observed in sand + inorganic manures.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 826–1060 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tuberose (Polianthus tuberosa L.) cv. Prajwal”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–129 · show in text ↑

Pseudomonas · growth · Agave amica (tuberose)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Azotobacter · yield · Agave amica (tuberose)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Azotobacter · growth · Agave amica (tuberose)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

inoculation · growth · Agave amica (tuberose)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 8 positive, 1 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

fertilization · yield · Agave amica (tuberose)Positive and negative results

39 papers: 38 positive, 1 negative or no effect

37 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

35 papers more in this group

See all 39 papers →

growing medium · quality: postharvest · Agave amica (tuberose)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

growing medium · growth · Agave amica (tuberose)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

growing medium · yield · Agave amica (tuberose)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

8 of 11 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.