Paper · 2019 · International Journal of Chemical Studies

Studies on influence of biostimulants and biofertilizers on bulbs, bulblets and spike yield of tuberose (Polianthes tuberosa L.) CV. Prajwal

S. R. Aghera; R. R. Viradia; VM Chovatiya

2
claims
3
verbatim quotes
2
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The present experiment entitled “Studies on influence of biostimulants and biofertilizers on bulbs, bulblets and spike yield of tuberose (Polianthes tuberose L.) cv. Prajwal” was carried out at Fruit Research Station, Lal Baugh Farm, Department of Horticulture, Junagadh Agricultural University, Junagadh (Gujarat) during March 2016 to February 2018. The experiment was laid out in Randomized Block Design with factorial concept (FRBD) consisting two factors with three repetitions. Five treatments of biostimulants and three treatments of biofertilizers were considered as treatment combinations. The results indicated that combined application of humic acid @ 0.2% with Azotobacter @ 3 ml/m2 + PSB @ 3 ml/m2 + KSB @ 3 ml/m2 at five spray (1st, 2nd, 3rd, 5th and 7th month after planting) of biostimulants and soil application of biofertilizers at the time of planting and 3rd & 6th month after planting and or ratooning enhanced the bulbs, bulblets and spike yield production in tuberose cv. Prajwal. While, maximum number of florets per spike was increased with treatment combination of panchgavya @ 3.0% with Azotobacter @ 3 ml/m2 + PSB @ 3 ml/m2 + KSB @ 3 ml/m2 at five spray (1st, 2nd, 3rd, 5th and 7th month after planting) of biostimulants and soil application of biofertilizers at the time of planting and 3rd & 6th month after planting and or ratooning.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 2

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Humic acid with biofertilizers enhanced bulb, bulblet and spike yield.

Taxon
tuberoseAgave amicae0
Material
Prajwale0
Treatment
humic acid @ 0.2% with Azotobacter @ 3 ml/m2 + PSB @ 3 ml/m2 + KSB @ 3 ml/m2e0
Outcome
bulbs, bulblets and spike yield productione0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Agave amica
Agave amica · TaxonSKsiddhartthan · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“combined application of humic acid @ 0.2% with Azotobacter @ 3 ml/m2 + PSB @ 3 ml/m2 + KSB @ 3 ml/m2 at five spray (1st, 2nd, 3rd, 5th and 7th month after planting) of biostimulants and soil application of biofertilizers at the time of planting and 3rd & 6th month after planting and or ratooning enhanced the bulbs, bulblets and spike yield production in tuberose cv. Prajwal”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 625–1001 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Panchgavya with biofertilizers maximized florets per spike.

Taxon
tuberose (Polianthes tuberosa L.)Agave amicat0
Material
Prajwalt0
Treatment
panchgavya @ 3.0% with Azotobacter @ 3 ml/m2 + PSB @ 3 ml/m2 + KSB @ 3 ml/m2e0
Outcome
number of florets per spikee0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Agave amica
Agave amica · TaxonSKsiddhartthan · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maximum number of florets per spike was increased with treatment combination of panchgavya @ 3.0% with Azotobacter @ 3 ml/m2 + PSB @ 3 ml/m2 + KSB @ 3 ml/m2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1010–1166 · show in text ↑
t0

“tuberose (Polianthes tuberosa L.) CV. Prajwal”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–140 · show in text ↑

Azotobacter · yield · Agave amica (tuberose)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

other · yield · Agave amica (tuberose)Results agree

9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.