Paper · 2023 · International Journal of Plant & Soil Science

Influence of Vermicompost and Bio-fertilizers on Growth and Flowering of Tuberose (Polianthes tuberosa L.) cv. Prajwal

Ritu Yadav; Bijender Singh Beniwal; Rajpal Singh Dalal; et al.

4
claims
8
verbatim quotes
1
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The experiment was planned to sustainably improve the growth and yield of tuberose using bio-fertilizers and organic manures. performed in pots in completely randomized design (CRD) with 11 treatments having four replications to study the response of organic manures, chemical fertilizers and bio fertilizers on growth and flower yield of tuberose (Polianthes tuberosa L.) cv. Prajwal. The treatment containing sand + vermicompost (4:1) + Bio-fertilizers (Azotobacter&Pseudomonas sp.) was significantly superior in terms of plant height (70.50 cm), length of leaf (36.98 cm), Number of leaf (25.67), spike length (66.58 cm), rachis length (27.23 cm), diameter of stem (1.096 cm), florets number per spike (35), number of opened florets per spike (33.67), spikes number per clump, spike weight (75.33 g), bulb number per clump (21), bulb diameter (1.20 cm), bulb weight (3.98 g). While lowest values of these parameters were observed in the control (sand). Minimum days taken to bulb sprouting (21.75 days), days taken to complete bulb sprouting (24.50 days), days taken to spike emergence (93 days) and days taken to opening of first floret (106.75 days) were observed in sand + inorganic manures. Treatment having Sand + vermicompost (4:1) + Bio-fertilizers (Azotobacter&Pseudomonas sp. was observed best to promote growth and flowering of tuberose.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The vermicompost and biofertilizer mix was superior for vegetative growth traits of tuberose.

Taxon
TuberoseAgave amicat0
Treatment
sand + vermicompost (4:1) + Bio-fertilizers (Azotobacter&Pseudomonas sp.)e0
Interactor
AzotobacterAzotobactere0symbiont
Second interactor
Pseudomonas sp.Pseudomonase0symbiont
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
superiore0
Value
70.50 cme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Agave amica
Agave amica · TaxonSKsiddhartthan · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azotobacter
Azotobacter · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)DAN H. JONES · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas
Pseudomonas · Second interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)CDC · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The treatment containing sand + vermicompost (4:1) + Bio-fertilizers (Azotobacter&Pseudomonas sp.) was significantly superior in terms of plant height (70.50 cm), length of leaf (36.98 cm), Number of leaf (25.67), spike length (66.58 cm), rachis length (27.23 cm), diameter of stem (1.096 cm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 386–678 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tuberose”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same mix was superior for tuberose flowering and bulb traits.

Taxon
TuberoseAgave amicat0
Outcome
spikes number per clumpe0

Not reportedTreatmentComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Agave amica
Agave amica · TaxonSKsiddhartthan · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“florets number per spike (35), number of opened florets per spike (33.67), spikes number per clump, spike weight (75.33 g), bulb number per clump (21), bulb diameter (1.20 cm), bulb weight (3.98 g)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 680–877 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tuberose”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Control sand produced the lowest values of the measured growth and flowering parameters.

Taxon
TuberoseAgave amicat0
Treatment
control (sand)e0
Outcome
these parameterse0
Direction
loweste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Agave amica
Agave amica · TaxonSKsiddhartthan · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“While lowest values of these parameters were observed in the control (sand)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 879–954 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tuberose”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sand plus inorganic manures minimized days to bulb sprouting and spike and flower emergence.

Taxon
TuberoseAgave amicat0
Treatment
sand + inorganic manurese0
Outcome
days taken to bulb sproutinge0
Direction
Minimume0
Value
21.75 dayse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Agave amica
Agave amica · TaxonSKsiddhartthan · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Minimum days taken to bulb sprouting (21.75 days), days taken to complete bulb sprouting (24.50 days), days taken to spike emergence (93 days) and days taken to opening of first floret (106.75 days) were observed in sand + inorganic manures”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 956–1196 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tuberose”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–81 · show in text ↑

Pseudomonas · growth · Agave amica (tuberose)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Azotobacter · growth · Agave amica (tuberose)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

inoculation · growth · Agave amica (tuberose)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 8 positive, 1 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

growing medium · quality: postharvest · Agave amica (tuberose)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

growing medium · growth · Agave amica (tuberose)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

fertilization · quality: postharvest · Agave amica (tuberose)Results agree

12 papers: 12 positive, 0 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

fertilization · growth · Agave amica (tuberose)Results agree

30 papers: 30 positive, 0 negative or no effect

29 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

26 papers more in this group

See all 30 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.