Paper · 2023 · European Scientific Journal ESJ

Effects of Slag Applications and Salinity Stress on Greenhouse Durum Wheat (Triticum durum Desf.) Plants

Farid Errouh; Abdelhamid Aouabe; Ayoub Sadouki; et al.

16
claims
32
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

The search for sustainable practices to increase productivity is a fundamental need in current agriculture. Steel slag has been studied for its potential use in agriculture. These substances present a great ability of agricultural applications since they are rich in nutrients. The effect of steel slag-based fertilizer was investigated on greenhouse durum wheat cultivar under salt-stress conditions. Two doses of slag: 10 g slag/ kg soil (D1) and 20 g slag/ kg soil (D2) were evaluated under no salt-stress (0 mM NaCl) and salt-stress conditions (100 mM NaCl) for salinity stress mitigation. Morpho-physiological and biochemical parameters of wheat were measured and compared to the different treatments. Exposure of wheat to salinity decreased its biomass, stomatal conductance, efficiency of photosystem II, and protein content, but it increased total soluble sugars, hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), and malondialdehyde (MDA) contents. Amended plants with 10 g slag/ kg soil (D1) led to a significant improvement in biomass with an increase of shoot and root dry weights (133% and 400% respectively), stomatal conductance (22 %), soluble sugars (14 %), and protein content (158%) under saline conditions compared to the control treatment with 0 g slag/ kg soil (C), thus indicating a positive influence on durum wheat plants. Soil enrichment with 20 g slag/kg soil (D2) decreased plant growth parameters and presented the highest levels of H2O2 and MDA contents compared to the control and treatment (D1) after three months of cultivation under salt stress. This study supports the hypothesis of the application of slag at lower dose, which improves productivity of durum wheat and mitigate salinity stress.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 16

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salinity decreased wheat biomass.

Treatment
salinitye0
Outcome
biomasse0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Exposure of wheat to salinity decreased its biomass, stomatal conductance, efficiency of photosystem II, and protein content, but it increased total soluble sugars, hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), and malondialdehyde (MDA) contents.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 707–933 · show in text ↑
t0

“durum wheat”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 63–74 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salinity decreased wheat stomatal conductance.

Treatment
salinitye0
Outcome
stomatal conductancee0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Exposure of wheat to salinity decreased its biomass, stomatal conductance, efficiency of photosystem II, and protein content, but it increased total soluble sugars, hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), and malondialdehyde (MDA) contents.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 707–933 · show in text ↑
t0

“durum wheat”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 63–74 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salinity decreased wheat efficiency of photosystem II.

Treatment
salinitye0
Outcome
efficiency of photosystem IIe0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Exposure of wheat to salinity decreased its biomass, stomatal conductance, efficiency of photosystem II, and protein content, but it increased total soluble sugars, hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), and malondialdehyde (MDA) contents.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 707–933 · show in text ↑
t0

“durum wheat”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 63–74 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salinity decreased wheat protein content.

Treatment
salinitye0
Outcome
protein contente0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Exposure of wheat to salinity decreased its biomass, stomatal conductance, efficiency of photosystem II, and protein content, but it increased total soluble sugars, hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), and malondialdehyde (MDA) contents.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 707–933 · show in text ↑
t0

“durum wheat”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 63–74 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salinity increased wheat total soluble sugars.

Treatment
salinitye0
Outcome
total soluble sugarse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Exposure of wheat to salinity decreased its biomass, stomatal conductance, efficiency of photosystem II, and protein content, but it increased total soluble sugars, hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), and malondialdehyde (MDA) contents.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 707–933 · show in text ↑
t0

“durum wheat”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 63–74 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salinity increased wheat hydrogen peroxide (H2O2).

Treatment
salinitye0
Outcome
hydrogen peroxide (H2O2)e0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Exposure of wheat to salinity decreased its biomass, stomatal conductance, efficiency of photosystem II, and protein content, but it increased total soluble sugars, hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), and malondialdehyde (MDA) contents.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 707–933 · show in text ↑
t0

“durum wheat”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 63–74 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salinity increased wheat malondialdehyde (MDA) contents.

Treatment
salinitye0
Outcome
malondialdehyde (MDA) contentse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Exposure of wheat to salinity decreased its biomass, stomatal conductance, efficiency of photosystem II, and protein content, but it increased total soluble sugars, hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), and malondialdehyde (MDA) contents.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 707–933 · show in text ↑
t0

“durum wheat”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 63–74 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At 10 g slag/kg soil under salinity, shoot increased by 133% versus unamended control.

Treatment
10 g slag/ kg soil (D1)e0
Outcome
shoot and root dry weightse0
Direction
increasee0
Value
133%e0
Qualifier
under saline conditionse0
Comparator
0 g slag/ kg soil (C)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Amended plants with 10 g slag/ kg soil (D1) led to a significant improvement in biomass with an increase of shoot and root dry weights (133% and 400% respectively), stomatal conductance (22 %), soluble sugars (14 %), and protein content (158%) under saline conditions compared to the control treatment with 0 g slag/ kg soil (C)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 934–1262 · show in text ↑
t0

“durum wheat”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 63–74 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At 10 g slag/kg soil under salinity, root increased by 400% versus unamended control.

Treatment
10 g slag/ kg soil (D1)e0
Outcome
shoot and root dry weightse0
Direction
increasee0
Value
400%e0
Qualifier
under saline conditionse0
Comparator
0 g slag/ kg soil (C)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Amended plants with 10 g slag/ kg soil (D1) led to a significant improvement in biomass with an increase of shoot and root dry weights (133% and 400% respectively), stomatal conductance (22 %), soluble sugars (14 %), and protein content (158%) under saline conditions compared to the control treatment with 0 g slag/ kg soil (C)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 934–1262 · show in text ↑
t0

“durum wheat”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 63–74 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At 10 g slag/kg soil under salinity, stomatal conductance increased by 22 % versus unamended control.

Treatment
10 g slag/ kg soil (D1)e0
Outcome
stomatal conductancee0
Direction
increasee0
Value
22 %e0
Qualifier
under saline conditionse0
Comparator
0 g slag/ kg soil (C)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Amended plants with 10 g slag/ kg soil (D1) led to a significant improvement in biomass with an increase of shoot and root dry weights (133% and 400% respectively), stomatal conductance (22 %), soluble sugars (14 %), and protein content (158%) under saline conditions compared to the control treatment with 0 g slag/ kg soil (C)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 934–1262 · show in text ↑
t0

“durum wheat”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 63–74 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At 10 g slag/kg soil under salinity, soluble sugars increased by 14 % versus unamended control.

Treatment
10 g slag/ kg soil (D1)e0
Outcome
soluble sugarse0
Direction
increasee0
Value
14 %e0
Qualifier
under saline conditionse0
Comparator
0 g slag/ kg soil (C)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Amended plants with 10 g slag/ kg soil (D1) led to a significant improvement in biomass with an increase of shoot and root dry weights (133% and 400% respectively), stomatal conductance (22 %), soluble sugars (14 %), and protein content (158%) under saline conditions compared to the control treatment with 0 g slag/ kg soil (C)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 934–1262 · show in text ↑
t0

“durum wheat”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 63–74 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At 10 g slag/kg soil under salinity, protein content increased by 158% versus unamended control.

Treatment
10 g slag/ kg soil (D1)e0
Outcome
protein contente0
Direction
increasee0
Value
158%e0
Qualifier
under saline conditionse0
Comparator
0 g slag/ kg soil (C)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Amended plants with 10 g slag/ kg soil (D1) led to a significant improvement in biomass with an increase of shoot and root dry weights (133% and 400% respectively), stomatal conductance (22 %), soluble sugars (14 %), and protein content (158%) under saline conditions compared to the control treatment with 0 g slag/ kg soil (C)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 934–1262 · show in text ↑
t0

“durum wheat”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 63–74 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 20 g slag/kg soil under salinity, growth parameters decreased versus control and the lower slag dose.

Treatment
20 g slag/kg soil (D2)e0
Outcome
plant growth parameterse0
Direction
decreasede0
Qualifier
under salt stresse0
Comparator
control and treatment (D1)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Soil enrichment with 20 g slag/kg soil (D2) decreased plant growth parameters and presented the highest levels of H2O2 and MDA contents compared to the control and treatment (D1) after three months of cultivation under salt stress.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1324–1555 · show in text ↑
t0

“durum wheat”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 63–74 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 20 g slag/kg soil under salinity, H2O2 was highest versus control and the lower slag dose.

Treatment
20 g slag/kg soil (D2)e0
Outcome
H2O2e0
Direction
higheste0
Qualifier
under salt stresse0
Comparator
control and treatment (D1)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Soil enrichment with 20 g slag/kg soil (D2) decreased plant growth parameters and presented the highest levels of H2O2 and MDA contents compared to the control and treatment (D1) after three months of cultivation under salt stress.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1324–1555 · show in text ↑
t0

“durum wheat”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 63–74 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 20 g slag/kg soil under salinity, MDA was highest versus control and the lower slag dose.

Treatment
20 g slag/kg soil (D2)e0
Outcome
MDA contentse0
Direction
higheste0
Qualifier
under salt stresse0
Comparator
control and treatment (D1)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Soil enrichment with 20 g slag/kg soil (D2) decreased plant growth parameters and presented the highest levels of H2O2 and MDA contents compared to the control and treatment (D1) after three months of cultivation under salt stress.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1324–1555 · show in text ↑
t0

“durum wheat”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 63–74 · show in text ↑
Recommendationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors support using a lower slag dose to improve durum wheat productivity and mitigate salinity stress.

Treatment
slag at lower dosee0
Outcome
improves productivity of durum wheat and mitigate salinity stresse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of slag at lower dose, which improves productivity of durum wheat and mitigate salinity stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1598–1704 · show in text ↑
t0

“durum wheat”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 63–74 · show in text ↑

salinity · physiology: osmolytes · Triticum turgidum (rivet wheat)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

salinity · growth · Triticum turgidum (rivet wheat)Positive and negative results

29 papers: 4 positive, 25 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

25 papers more in this group

See all 29 papers →

salinity · physiology: gas exchange · Triticum turgidum (rivet wheat)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

salinity · physiology: oxidative · Triticum turgidum (rivet wheat)Results agree

4 papers: 0 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

salinity · quality: protein · Triticum turgidum (rivet wheat)Results agree

5 papers: 0 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.