Paper · 2013 · DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)

Effect of Salt Stress on Grain Reserve Composition in Ten Durum Wheat Cultivars

Sonia Kahrizi; Mohammad Sedghi

20
claims
40
verbatim quotes
7
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Saline soils are defined as those that contain sufficient soluble salts in the root zone to impair plant growth. Wheat is one of the three major cereals dominating world agriculture to date. Durum wheat is the hardest wheat and the concept of durum wheat quality is complex and confusing. Quality factors such as protein content, gluten strength and color have different priorities in various durum wheat markets. Changes in the grain quality of ten durum wheat cultivars under salt stress studied at the greenhouse condition. A factorial experiment was carried out based on completely randomized design with three replications. Treatments were salinity including 0, 60 and 120 mM and ten durum wheat cultivars (Boomer, PGS, 71135, 61130,605, C1351, KND, KDM, Haurani and G1252). Biochemical grain reserves such total protein and carbohydrate content, gluten, phosphorous and beta carotene were measured. Results showed that interaction of salt and cultivars was significant for all studied traits except of beta-carotene. At this experiment, gluten content changed very little with salinity levels. Cultivar 71135 at all salinity levels had the highest gluten content. With increasing of salt severity, the content of protein and carbohydrate decreased and content of phosphorous increased compared with control. In 60 mM salinity, cultivars 61130 and 71135, in 120 mM, 71135 and KDM and in control, 61130 and PGS respectively, had the highest and lowest content of protein. Cultivars 71135 and 61130 had the highest and PGS had the lowest phosphorous content in control. At 60 mM, cultivars 71135 and PGS respectively, had the highest and lowest phosphorous content. At 120mM, 71135 and Haurani respectively, had the highest and lowest phosphorous content. In three salt levels, cultivar 71135 was determined as the most tolerant cultivar according to content of grain reserve composition results.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 20

Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Salt by cultivar interaction was significant for all studied grain traits except beta-carotene.

Material
cultivarse0
Treatment
salte0
Outcome
all studied traits except of beta-carotenee0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Results showed that interaction of salt and cultivars was significant for all studied traits except of beta-carotene.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 905–1022 · show in text ↑
t0

“Durum Wheat Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–79 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gluten content changed very little across salinity levels.

Treatment
salinity levelse0
Outcome
gluten contente0
Direction
changed very littlee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At this experiment, gluten content changed very little with salinity levels.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1023–1099 · show in text ↑
t0

“Durum Wheat Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–79 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cultivar 71135 had the highest gluten content at all salinity levels.

Material
71135e0
Outcome
gluten contente0
Direction
higheste0
Qualifier
all salinity levelse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cultivar 71135 at all salinity levels had the highest gluten content.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1100–1169 · show in text ↑
t0

“Durum Wheat Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–79 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing salt severity decreased protein content versus control.

Treatment
increasing of salt severitye0
Outcome
content of proteine0
Direction
decreasede0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“With increasing of salt severity, the content of protein and carbohydrate decreased and content of phosphorous increased compared with control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1170–1313 · show in text ↑
t0

“Durum Wheat Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–79 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing salt severity decreased carbohydrate content versus control.

Treatment
increasing of salt severitye0
Outcome
carbohydratee0
Direction
decreasede0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“With increasing of salt severity, the content of protein and carbohydrate decreased and content of phosphorous increased compared with control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1170–1313 · show in text ↑
t0

“Durum Wheat Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–79 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing salt severity increased phosphorous content versus control.

Treatment
increasing of salt severitye0
Outcome
content of phosphorouse0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“With increasing of salt severity, the content of protein and carbohydrate decreased and content of phosphorous increased compared with control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1170–1313 · show in text ↑
t0

“Durum Wheat Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–79 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

61130 had highest protein content under 60 mM.

Material
61130e0
Treatment
60 mMe0
Outcome
content of proteine0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In 60 mM salinity, cultivars 61130 and 71135, in 120 mM, 71135 and KDM and in control, 61130 and PGS respectively, had the highest and lowest content of protein.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1314–1475 · show in text ↑
t0

“Durum Wheat Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–79 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

71135 had lowest protein content under 60 mM.

Material
71135e0
Treatment
60 mMe0
Outcome
content of proteine0
Direction
loweste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In 60 mM salinity, cultivars 61130 and 71135, in 120 mM, 71135 and KDM and in control, 61130 and PGS respectively, had the highest and lowest content of protein.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1314–1475 · show in text ↑
t0

“Durum Wheat Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–79 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

71135 had highest protein content under 120 mM.

Material
71135e0
Treatment
120 mMe0
Outcome
content of proteine0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In 60 mM salinity, cultivars 61130 and 71135, in 120 mM, 71135 and KDM and in control, 61130 and PGS respectively, had the highest and lowest content of protein.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1314–1475 · show in text ↑
t0

“Durum Wheat Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–79 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

KDM had lowest protein content under 120 mM.

Material
KDMe0
Treatment
120 mMe0
Outcome
content of proteine0
Direction
loweste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In 60 mM salinity, cultivars 61130 and 71135, in 120 mM, 71135 and KDM and in control, 61130 and PGS respectively, had the highest and lowest content of protein.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1314–1475 · show in text ↑
t0

“Durum Wheat Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–79 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

61130 had highest protein content under control.

Material
61130e0
Treatment
controle0
Outcome
content of proteine0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In 60 mM salinity, cultivars 61130 and 71135, in 120 mM, 71135 and KDM and in control, 61130 and PGS respectively, had the highest and lowest content of protein.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1314–1475 · show in text ↑
t0

“Durum Wheat Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–79 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PGS had lowest protein content under control.

Material
PGSe0
Treatment
controle0
Outcome
content of proteine0
Direction
loweste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In 60 mM salinity, cultivars 61130 and 71135, in 120 mM, 71135 and KDM and in control, 61130 and PGS respectively, had the highest and lowest content of protein.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1314–1475 · show in text ↑
t0

“Durum Wheat Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–79 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

71135 had highest phosphorus content in control.

Material
71135e0
Treatment
controle0
Outcome
phosphorous contente0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cultivars 71135 and 61130 had the highest and PGS had the lowest phosphorous content in control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1476–1572 · show in text ↑
t0

“Durum Wheat Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–79 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

61130 had highest phosphorus content in control.

Material
61130e0
Treatment
controle0
Outcome
phosphorous contente0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cultivars 71135 and 61130 had the highest and PGS had the lowest phosphorous content in control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1476–1572 · show in text ↑
t0

“Durum Wheat Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–79 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PGS had lowest phosphorus content in control.

Material
PGSe0
Treatment
controle0
Outcome
phosphorous contente0
Direction
loweste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cultivars 71135 and 61130 had the highest and PGS had the lowest phosphorous content in control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1476–1572 · show in text ↑
t0

“Durum Wheat Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–79 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

71135 had highest phosphorus content at 60 mM.

Material
71135e0
Treatment
60 mMe0
Outcome
phosphorous contente0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At 60 mM, cultivars 71135 and PGS respectively, had the highest and lowest phosphorous content.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1573–1668 · show in text ↑
t0

“Durum Wheat Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–79 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PGS had lowest phosphorus content at 60 mM.

Material
PGSe0
Treatment
60 mMe0
Outcome
phosphorous contente0
Direction
loweste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At 60 mM, cultivars 71135 and PGS respectively, had the highest and lowest phosphorous content.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1573–1668 · show in text ↑
t0

“Durum Wheat Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–79 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

71135 had highest phosphorus content at 120mM.

Material
71135e0
Treatment
120mMe0
Outcome
phosphorous contente0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At 120mM, 71135 and Haurani respectively, had the highest and lowest phosphorous content.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1669–1758 · show in text ↑
t0

“Durum Wheat Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–79 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Haurani had lowest phosphorus content at 120mM.

Material
Hauranie0
Treatment
120mMe0
Outcome
phosphorous contente0
Direction
loweste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At 120mM, 71135 and Haurani respectively, had the highest and lowest phosphorous content.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1669–1758 · show in text ↑
t0

“Durum Wheat Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–79 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cultivar 71135 was the most salt tolerant based on grain reserve composition.

Material
71135e0
Outcome
most tolerant cultivare0
Qualifier
In three salt levelse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In three salt levels, cultivar 71135 was determined as the most tolerant cultivar according to content of grain reserve composition results.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1759–1899 · show in text ↑
t0

“Durum Wheat Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–79 · show in text ↑

salinity · quality: sugar starch · Triticum turgidum (rivet wheat)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

salinity · quality: protein · Triticum turgidum (rivet wheat)Results agree

5 papers: 0 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.