Paper · 2023 · Heliyon

Influence of cultivar and fertilization treatment on the yield and leaf nutrients content of apple (Malus domestica Borkh.)

Dževad Ljavić; Mirjana Radović; Mirko Kulina; et al.

17
claims
34
verbatim quotes
17
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Fertilisation strategy can have a big impact on apple ( Malus domestica Borkh) yield, with considerable environmental and economic implications. This research paper presents the yield and leaf nutrients content of three apple cultivars fertilised with three treatment regimes over 2 years (2020–202) in Bosnia and Herzegovina. The specific apple cultivars investigated were: Jonagold Decosta, Red Idared and Gala Schnitzer®Schniga, each fertilised with three treatments: T 1 (control‒without fertilization); T 2 (300 kg ha −1 NPK (6:18:36) + 150 kg/ha N (calcium ammonium nitrate‒CAN)) and T 3 (foliar nutrition‒mixture organic-mineral fertilizer commercially named "FitoFert Kristal" (0.6%) (10:40:10) + "FitoFert Kristal" (0.6%) (20:20:20) + "FoliFetril Ca" (0.5%) (N:Ca)) in Bosnia and Herzegovina in the period of two years (2020–2021). Significant differences of different yield categories (yield per tree, yield per hectare and yield efficiency) were found among cultivar/treatment combinations, cultivars, treatments and years. Yield per tree, yield per hectare and yield efficiency were lowest in cultivar Jonagold DeCosta. Fertilization treatment T 1 significantly influenced the lowest yield per tree and yield per hectare with the magnitudes 7.55 kg tree −1 and 27.96 t ha −1 , respectively. The highest yield efficiency was found in trees fertilised with treatment T 3 with 9.21 55 kg tree −1 , 34.11 96 t ha −1 and yield efficiency of 0.25 kg cm −2 . Six mineral elements in the apple leaf, such as boron (B), calcium (Ca), manganese (Mn), iron (Fe), potassium (K), and zinc (Zn), were presented in known magnitudes. The cultivar Jonagold DeCosta's leaves had the highest K, B, and Zn contents with 8500.8 mg kg −1 FW (i.e. fresh weight of leaves), 33.8 mg kg −1 FW, and 12.2 mg kg −1 FW, respectively, while cultivar Red Idared's leaves had the highest Ca, Fe, and Mg contents. The fertilisation treatment T 3 influenced significantly the highest content of Ca (301.37 mg kg −1 FW), Fe (116.5 mg kg −1 FW), B (41.6 mg kg −1 FW), Mn (22.4 mg kg −1 FW), and Zn (14.9 mg kg −1 FW) in leaves, while the highest content of K was found in leaves from trees fertilised with treatment T 2 (8130.5 mg kg −1 FW). The experimental outcomes have proven that the cultivar/treatment combinations, cultivars, treatments, and time duration (in years) are the key factors affecting the potassium, calcium, iron, boron, and manganese contents. It was concluded that the foliar application enables easier mobility of elements, which results in a greater number of fruits and larger fruits, which leads to a higher yield. This study is the first of its kind in Bosnia and Herzegovina, and the findings of this research will pave the way for future research activities involving increasing the number of cultivars and different fertilisation treatments on apple yield and leaf mineral composition.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 17

Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield categories differed significantly among cultivar, treatment, combinations and years.

Material
cultivarse0
Outcome
yield per tree, yield per hectare and yield efficiencye0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significant differences of different yield categories (yield per tree, yield per hectare and yield efficiency) were found among cultivar/treatment combinations, cultivars, treatments and years.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 841–1034 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple (Malus domestica Borkh.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–123 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Jonagold DeCosta had the lowest yield per tree, hectare and efficiency.

Material
Jonagold DeCostae0
Outcome
Yield per tree, yield per hectare and yield efficiencye0
Direction
loweste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Yield per tree, yield per hectare and yield efficiency were lowest in cultivar Jonagold DeCosta.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1035–1131 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple (Malus domestica Borkh.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–123 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

T 1 had the lowest yield per tree at 7.55 kg tree −1.

Treatment
Fertilization treatment T 1e0
Outcome
yield per treee0
Direction
loweste0
Value
7.55 kg tree −1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fertilization treatment T 1 significantly influenced the lowest yield per tree and yield per hectare with the magnitudes 7.55 kg tree −1 and 27.96 t ha −1 , respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1132–1302 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple (Malus domestica Borkh.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–123 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

T 1 had the lowest yield per hectare at 27.96 t ha −1.

Treatment
Fertilization treatment T 1e0
Outcome
yield per hectaree0
Direction
loweste0
Value
27.96 t ha −1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fertilization treatment T 1 significantly influenced the lowest yield per tree and yield per hectare with the magnitudes 7.55 kg tree −1 and 27.96 t ha −1 , respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1132–1302 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple (Malus domestica Borkh.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–123 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T 3 had the highest yield efficiency of 0.25 kg cm −2.

Treatment
treatment T 3e0
Outcome
yield efficiencye0
Direction
higheste0
Value
0.25 kg cm −2e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest yield efficiency was found in trees fertilised with treatment T 3 with 9.21 55 kg tree −1 , 34.11 96 t ha −1 and yield efficiency of 0.25 kg cm −2 .”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1303–1463 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple (Malus domestica Borkh.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–123 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Jonagold DeCosta had the highest leaf K content at 8500.8 mg kg −1 FW.

Material
Jonagold DeCostae0
Outcome
Ke0
Direction
higheste0
Value
8500.8 mg kg −1 FWe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The cultivar Jonagold DeCosta's leaves had the highest K, B, and Zn contents with 8500.8 mg kg −1 FW (i.e. fresh weight of leaves), 33.8 mg kg −1 FW, and 12.2 mg kg −1 FW, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1630–1814 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple (Malus domestica Borkh.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–123 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Jonagold DeCosta had the highest leaf B content at 33.8 mg kg −1 FW.

Material
Jonagold DeCostae0
Outcome
Be0
Direction
higheste0
Value
33.8 mg kg −1 FWe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The cultivar Jonagold DeCosta's leaves had the highest K, B, and Zn contents with 8500.8 mg kg −1 FW (i.e. fresh weight of leaves), 33.8 mg kg −1 FW, and 12.2 mg kg −1 FW, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1630–1814 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple (Malus domestica Borkh.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–123 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Jonagold DeCosta had the highest leaf Zn content at 12.2 mg kg −1 FW.

Material
Jonagold DeCostae0
Outcome
Zne0
Direction
higheste0
Value
12.2 mg kg −1 FWe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The cultivar Jonagold DeCosta's leaves had the highest K, B, and Zn contents with 8500.8 mg kg −1 FW (i.e. fresh weight of leaves), 33.8 mg kg −1 FW, and 12.2 mg kg −1 FW, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1630–1814 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple (Malus domestica Borkh.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–123 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Red Idared had the highest leaf Ca, Fe and Mg contents.

Material
Red Idarede0
Outcome
Ca, Fe, and Mg contentse0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cultivar Red Idared's leaves had the highest Ca, Fe, and Mg contents.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1822–1891 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple (Malus domestica Borkh.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–123 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

T 3 gave the highest leaf Ca at 301.37 mg kg −1 FW.

Treatment
fertilisation treatment T 3e0
Outcome
content of Cae0
Direction
higheste0
Value
301.37 mg kg −1 FWe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The fertilisation treatment T 3 influenced significantly the highest content of Ca (301.37 mg kg −1 FW), Fe (116.5 mg kg −1 FW), B (41.6 mg kg −1 FW), Mn (22.4 mg kg −1 FW), and Zn (14.9 mg kg −1 FW) in leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1892–2101 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple (Malus domestica Borkh.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–123 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

T 3 gave the highest leaf Fe at 116.5 mg kg −1 FW.

Treatment
fertilisation treatment T 3e0
Outcome
Fee0
Direction
higheste0
Value
116.5 mg kg −1 FWe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The fertilisation treatment T 3 influenced significantly the highest content of Ca (301.37 mg kg −1 FW), Fe (116.5 mg kg −1 FW), B (41.6 mg kg −1 FW), Mn (22.4 mg kg −1 FW), and Zn (14.9 mg kg −1 FW) in leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1892–2101 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple (Malus domestica Borkh.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–123 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

T 3 gave the highest leaf B at 41.6 mg kg −1 FW.

Treatment
fertilisation treatment T 3e0
Outcome
Be0
Direction
higheste0
Value
41.6 mg kg −1 FWe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The fertilisation treatment T 3 influenced significantly the highest content of Ca (301.37 mg kg −1 FW), Fe (116.5 mg kg −1 FW), B (41.6 mg kg −1 FW), Mn (22.4 mg kg −1 FW), and Zn (14.9 mg kg −1 FW) in leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1892–2101 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple (Malus domestica Borkh.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–123 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

T 3 gave the highest leaf Mn at 22.4 mg kg −1 FW.

Treatment
fertilisation treatment T 3e0
Outcome
Mne0
Direction
higheste0
Value
22.4 mg kg −1 FWe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The fertilisation treatment T 3 influenced significantly the highest content of Ca (301.37 mg kg −1 FW), Fe (116.5 mg kg −1 FW), B (41.6 mg kg −1 FW), Mn (22.4 mg kg −1 FW), and Zn (14.9 mg kg −1 FW) in leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1892–2101 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple (Malus domestica Borkh.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–123 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

T 3 gave the highest leaf Zn at 14.9 mg kg −1 FW.

Treatment
fertilisation treatment T 3e0
Outcome
Zne0
Direction
higheste0
Value
14.9 mg kg −1 FWe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The fertilisation treatment T 3 influenced significantly the highest content of Ca (301.37 mg kg −1 FW), Fe (116.5 mg kg −1 FW), B (41.6 mg kg −1 FW), Mn (22.4 mg kg −1 FW), and Zn (14.9 mg kg −1 FW) in leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1892–2101 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple (Malus domestica Borkh.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–123 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T 2 gave the highest leaf K at 8130.5 mg kg −1 FW.

Treatment
treatment T 2e0
Outcome
content of Ke0
Direction
higheste0
Value
8130.5 mg kg −1 FWe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the highest content of K was found in leaves from trees fertilised with treatment T 2 (8130.5 mg kg −1 FW).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2109–2216 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple (Malus domestica Borkh.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–123 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cultivar, treatment, combinations and years affected leaf K, Ca, Fe, B and Mn.

Material
cultivarse0
Outcome
potassium, calcium, iron, boron, and manganese contentse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cultivar/treatment combinations, cultivars, treatments, and time duration (in years) are the key factors affecting the potassium, calcium, iron, boron, and manganese contents.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2264–2439 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple (Malus domestica Borkh.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–123 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors infer foliar fertilization improves fruit number and size and thus yield.

Treatment
foliar applicatione0
Outcome
higher yielde0
Qualifier
easier mobility of elementse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the foliar application enables easier mobility of elements, which results in a greater number of fruits and larger fruits, which leads to a higher yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2462–2615 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple (Malus domestica Borkh.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–123 · show in text ↑

fertilization · molecular: metabolites · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

49 papers: 31 positive, 18 negative or no effect

30 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

45 papers more in this group

See all 49 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

117 papers: 86 positive, 31 negative or no effect

85 papers in the same direction as this paper · 29 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

113 papers more in this group

See all 117 papers →

fertilization · yield · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

178 papers: 150 positive, 28 negative or no effect

27 papers in the same direction as this paper · 150 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

174 papers more in this group

See all 178 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.