Paper · 2023 · Journal of Applied Life Sciences and Environment

THE INFLUENCE OF MINIMAL NPK FERTILISATION ON THE QUANTITY AND QUALITY OF APPLE YIELDS

Diana Elena BOLOHAN; Mariana VOLF; Lucian RAUS

5
claims
13
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

During an annual cycle, fruit trees go through developmental stages, characterised by a higher demand for some mineral elements, called critical periods, which coincide with the phenophases of bud opening and shoot initiation. Research on mineral nutrition in fruit growing has highlighted that the maximum consumption of nutrients is during the period of shoot growth, fruit development and differentiation of fruit buds. In apple, flowering is influenced more by the time of fertiliser application and the form of nitrogen than by the amount applied, as apple has high requirements for the element phosphorus in the phenophases of intense shoot growth and wood maturation. Fertilisation with NPK increased apple yield for both fertilisation treatments compared to the unfertilised control treatments. After applying 270 kg·ha⁻¹ NPK in the first year of the experiment, very significant production increases were obtained, 4.46t·ha⁻¹, with a content of 16% dry matter, 13.13°Brix soluble matter and a titratable acidity of 0.465 mg malic acid/100 g.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NPK fertilisation increased apple yield compared with unfertilised control treatments.

Treatment
Fertilisation with NPKe1
Outcome
apple yielde1
Direction
increasede1
Comparator
unfertilised control treatmentse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Fertilisation with NPK increased apple yield for both fertilisation treatments compared to the unfertilised control treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 675–801 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Applying 270 kg·ha⁻¹ NPK in the first year gave a very significant apple production increase of 4.46 t·ha⁻¹ relative to the control.

Treatment
270 kg·ha⁻¹ NPKe2
Outcome
productione2
Direction
increasese2
Value
4.46t·ha⁻¹e2
Comparator
unfertilised control treatmentse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“After applying 270 kg·ha⁻¹ NPK in the first year of the experiment, very significant production increases were obtained, 4.46t·ha⁻¹”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 803–934 · show in text ↑
e1

“compared to the unfertilised control treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 754–801 · show in text ↑
t0

“QUALITY OF APPLE YIELDS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–86 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Apple fruit from trees given 270 kg·ha⁻¹ NPK had a dry matter content of 16%.

Treatment
270 kg·ha⁻¹ NPKe2
Outcome
dry mattere3
Value
16%e3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“After applying 270 kg·ha⁻¹ NPK in the first year of the experiment, very significant production increases were obtained, 4.46t·ha⁻¹”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 803–934 · show in text ↑
e3

“with a content of 16% dry matter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 936–968 · show in text ↑
t0

“QUALITY OF APPLE YIELDS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–86 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Apple fruit from trees given 270 kg·ha⁻¹ NPK had 13.13°Brix soluble matter.

Treatment
270 kg·ha⁻¹ NPKe2
Outcome
soluble mattere4
Value
13.13°Brixe4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“After applying 270 kg·ha⁻¹ NPK in the first year of the experiment, very significant production increases were obtained, 4.46t·ha⁻¹”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 803–934 · show in text ↑
e4

“13.13°Brix soluble matter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 970–995 · show in text ↑
t0

“QUALITY OF APPLE YIELDS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–86 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Apple fruit from trees given 270 kg·ha⁻¹ NPK had a titratable acidity of 0.465 mg malic acid/100 g.

Treatment
270 kg·ha⁻¹ NPKe2
Outcome
titratable aciditye5
Value
0.465 mg malic acid/100 ge5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“After applying 270 kg·ha⁻¹ NPK in the first year of the experiment, very significant production increases were obtained, 4.46t·ha⁻¹”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 803–934 · show in text ↑
e5

“a titratable acidity of 0.465 mg malic acid/100 g”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1000–1049 · show in text ↑
t0

“QUALITY OF APPLE YIELDS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–86 · show in text ↑

fertilization · yield · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

178 papers: 150 positive, 28 negative or no effect

149 papers in the same direction as this paper · 26 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

174 papers more in this group

See all 178 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.