Abstract
). The results showed that, compared with the control (ambient temperature), average temperature at nighttime on rice canopy and at 5 cm soil layer increased by 0.51-0.58 ℃ and 0.28-0.41 ℃ during rice growing season, respectively. Nighttime warming decreased tiller number and chlorophyll content by 2.5%-15.9% and 0.2%-7.7%, respectively. In contrast, silicate application increased tiller number and chlorophyll content by 1.7%-16.2% and 1.6%-16.6%, respectively. Under nighttime warming, silicate application increased dry weight of shoot, total dry weight of the whole plant, and yield at grain filling-maturity stage by 64.1%, 55.3%, and 7.1%, respectively. Under nighttime warming, silicate application significantly increased milled rice rate, head rice rate, and total starch content by 2.3%, 2.5%, and 41.8%, respectively. Nighttime warming reduced rice yield by decreasing the number of effective panicles, seed setting rate, and 1000-grain weight, but increasing empty grains. Silicate application increased rice yield by increasing the number of effective panicles, filled grains per panicle, seed setting rate and 1000-grain weight, but reducing empty grains. In conclusion, silicate application could effectively alleviate the suppressive effects of nighttime warming on growth, yield, and quality of single rice in Southern China.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 18
Claim · model-written summary
Nighttime warming increased canopy nighttime temperature by 0.51-0.58 ℃.
- Taxon
- rice
Oryza sativae0 - Treatment
- Nighttime warminge1
- Outcome
- average temperature at nighttime on rice canopye0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 0.51-0.58 ℃e0
- Comparator
- control (ambient temperature)e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“compared with the control (ambient temperature), average temperature at nighttime on rice canopy and at 5 cm soil layer increased by 0.51-0.58 ℃ and 0.28-0.41 ℃ during rice growing season, respectively.”
e1“Nighttime warming decreased tiller number”
Claim · model-written summary
Nighttime warming increased soil-layer nighttime temperature by 0.28-0.41 ℃.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativae0
- Treatment
- Nighttime warminge1
- Outcome
- temperature at nighttime on rice canopy and at 5 cm soil layere0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 0.28-0.41 ℃e0
- Comparator
- control (ambient temperature)e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“compared with the control (ambient temperature), average temperature at nighttime on rice canopy and at 5 cm soil layer increased by 0.51-0.58 ℃ and 0.28-0.41 ℃ during rice growing season, respectively.”
e1“Nighttime warming decreased tiller number”
Claim · model-written summary
Nighttime warming decreased tiller number by 2.5%-15.9%.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativat0
- Treatment
- Nighttime warminge0
- Outcome
- tiller numbere0
- Direction
- decreasede0
- Value
- 2.5%-15.9%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Nighttime warming decreased tiller number and chlorophyll content by 2.5%-15.9% and 0.2%-7.7%, respectively.”
t0“rice”
Claim · model-written summary
Nighttime warming decreased chlorophyll content by 0.2%-7.7%.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativat0
- Treatment
- Nighttime warminge0
- Outcome
- chlorophyll contente0
- Direction
- decreasede0
- Value
- 0.2%-7.7%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Nighttime warming decreased tiller number and chlorophyll content by 2.5%-15.9% and 0.2%-7.7%, respectively.”
t0“rice”
Claim · model-written summary
Silicate application increased tiller number by 1.7%-16.2%.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativat0
- Treatment
- silicate applicatione0
- Outcome
- tiller numbere0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 1.7%-16.2%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“silicate application increased tiller number and chlorophyll content by 1.7%-16.2% and 1.6%-16.6%, respectively.”
t0“rice”
Claim · model-written summary
Silicate application increased chlorophyll content by 1.6%-16.6%.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativat0
- Treatment
- silicate applicatione0
- Outcome
- chlorophyll contente0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 1.6%-16.6%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“silicate application increased tiller number and chlorophyll content by 1.7%-16.2% and 1.6%-16.6%, respectively.”
t0“rice”
Claim · model-written summary
Under warming, silicate increased shoot dry weight by 64.1%.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativat0
- Treatment
- silicate applicatione0
- Outcome
- dry weight of shoote0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 64.1%e0
- Qualifier
- Under nighttime warminge0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Under nighttime warming, silicate application increased dry weight of shoot, total dry weight of the whole plant, and yield at grain filling-maturity stage by 64.1%, 55.3%, and 7.1%, respectively.”
t0“rice”
Claim · model-written summary
Under warming, silicate increased total plant dry weight by 55.3%.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativat0
- Treatment
- silicate applicatione0
- Outcome
- total dry weight of the whole plante0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 55.3%e0
- Qualifier
- Under nighttime warminge0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Under nighttime warming, silicate application increased dry weight of shoot, total dry weight of the whole plant, and yield at grain filling-maturity stage by 64.1%, 55.3%, and 7.1%, respectively.”
t0“rice”
Claim · model-written summary
Under warming, silicate increased yield by 7.1%.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativat0
- Treatment
- silicate applicatione0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 7.1%e0
- Qualifier
- Under nighttime warminge0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Under nighttime warming, silicate application increased dry weight of shoot, total dry weight of the whole plant, and yield at grain filling-maturity stage by 64.1%, 55.3%, and 7.1%, respectively.”
t0“rice”
Claim · model-written summary
Under warming, silicate significantly increased milled rice rate by 2.3%.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativae0
- Treatment
- silicate applicatione0
- Outcome
- milled rice ratee0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 2.3%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Under nighttime warming, silicate application significantly increased milled rice rate, head rice rate, and total starch content by 2.3%, 2.5%, and 41.8%, respectively.”
Claim · model-written summary
Under warming, silicate significantly increased head rice rate by 2.5%.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativae0
- Treatment
- silicate applicatione0
- Outcome
- head rice ratee0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 2.5%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Under nighttime warming, silicate application significantly increased milled rice rate, head rice rate, and total starch content by 2.3%, 2.5%, and 41.8%, respectively.”
Claim · model-written summary
Under warming, silicate significantly increased starch content by 41.8%.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativae0
- Treatment
- silicate applicatione0
- Outcome
- total starch contente0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 41.8%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Under nighttime warming, silicate application significantly increased milled rice rate, head rice rate, and total starch content by 2.3%, 2.5%, and 41.8%, respectively.”
Claim · model-written summary
Nighttime warming reduced rice yield.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativae0
- Treatment
- Nighttime warminge0
- Outcome
- rice yielde0
- Direction
- reducede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Nighttime warming reduced rice yield by decreasing the number of effective panicles, seed setting rate, and 1000-grain weight, but increasing empty grains.”
Claim · model-written summary
Nighttime warming decreased effective panicles, seed setting rate and thousand-grain weight.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativae0
- Treatment
- Nighttime warminge0
- Outcome
- number of effective panicles, seed setting rate, and 1000-grain weighte0
- Direction
- decreasinge0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Nighttime warming reduced rice yield by decreasing the number of effective panicles, seed setting rate, and 1000-grain weight, but increasing empty grains.”
Claim · model-written summary
Nighttime warming increased empty grains.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativae0
- Treatment
- Nighttime warminge0
- Outcome
- empty grainse0
- Direction
- increasinge0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Nighttime warming reduced rice yield by decreasing the number of effective panicles, seed setting rate, and 1000-grain weight, but increasing empty grains.”
Claim · model-written summary
Silicate application increased rice yield.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativae0
- Treatment
- Silicate applicatione0
- Outcome
- rice yielde0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Silicate application increased rice yield by increasing the number of effective panicles, filled grains per panicle, seed setting rate and 1000-grain weight, but reducing empty grains.”
Claim · model-written summary
Silicate increased effective panicles, filled grains, seed setting rate and thousand-grain weight.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativae0
- Treatment
- Silicate applicatione0
- Outcome
- number of effective panicles, filled grains per panicle, seed setting rate and 1000-grain weighte0
- Direction
- increasinge0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Silicate application increased rice yield by increasing the number of effective panicles, filled grains per panicle, seed setting rate and 1000-grain weight, but reducing empty grains.”
Claim · model-written summary
Silicate reduced empty grains.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativae0
- Treatment
- Silicate applicatione0
- Outcome
- empty grainse0
- Direction
- reducinge0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Silicate application increased rice yield by increasing the number of effective panicles, filled grains per panicle, seed setting rate and 1000-grain weight, but reducing empty grains.”
The same questions in other papers
silicate(4-) · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ
14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- positive
13 papers more in this group
See all 17 papers →silicate(4-) · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results
43 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
43 papers more in this group
See all 47 papers →silicate(4-) · physiology: pigments · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
silicate(4-) · quality: sugar starch · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree
3 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
silicate(4-) · organism · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree
3 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
silicate(4-) · quality: grain · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree
3 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
heat · physiology: pigments · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ
12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
14 papers more in this group
See all 18 papers →heat · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results
158 papers in the same direction as this paper · 36 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
191 papers more in this group
See all 195 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.