Paper · 2023 · IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science

Effect of Foliar Application of Humic Acid and Nano-NPK on Some Growth Characteristic of Apple Trees Malus Domestica Borkh

Jihan Qassem Hassan gli; Jassim Mohammed Khalaf

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
2
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract This study was carried out in one of the private orchards, which are 20 km away from Kirkuk province in the Altun Kobri area, during the period from May 2021 to August 2021, to study the effect of fertilizing with humic acid at three levels (0, 20, 40) gm and spraying with fertilizer The nano NPK with four levels (0, 1.5, 2.5, 3.5) g.L-1 in some growth characteristics and the yield of apple trees of the local Ibrahimi variety. The experiment was designed according to the design of randomized complete blocks (RCBD), a factorial investigation that included three factors of humic acid and four factors of the compound fertilizer nano NPK and with three replications, the number of treatments in each sector (12) treatments, and with 36 trees included in this experiment, and the treatments were distributed randomly on the experimental units, and for analyzing the data we use the SAS program, and the Duncan polynomial test was adopted under the probability level of 5%. The results showed that the humic acid fertilization gave significant differences in the averages of the studied traits, as the treatment of humic fertilizer at the level (40) gave the highest rate in the following characteristics (the chlorophyll content of the leaves and the proportion of potassium and phosphorous in the leaves). In contrast, the treatment (20) gave the highest rate in Characteristics (the percentage of nitrogen in leaves and leaf area). As for the treatment of spraying with nanocomposite fertilizer with a concentration of (3500), it achieved the highest rate in the characteristics (the content of chlorophyll in the leaves and the percentage of nitrogen, phosphorous and potassium in the leaves), while it gave the concentration (2500) the highest rate in the leaf area. The results also showed that the binary interaction achieved significant differences in the studied traits, as treatment (40) of humic fertilizer and (3500) of the nano-complex fertilizer achieved the highest rate in most of the studied features, namely (leaf area, leaf content of chlorophyll and phosphorous percentage in leaves).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Humic fertilizer at level 40 maximized leaf chlorophyll, potassium and phosphorous.

Taxon
Apple TreesMalus domesticat0
Treatment
humic fertilizer at the level (40)e0
Outcome
chlorophyll content of the leaves and the proportion of potassium and phosphorous in the leavese0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the treatment of humic fertilizer at the level (40) gave the highest rate in the following characteristics (the chlorophyll content of the leaves and the proportion of potassium and phosphorous in the leaves)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1109–1317 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple Trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–100 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Humic fertilizer level 20 maximized leaf nitrogen and leaf area.

Taxon
Apple TreesMalus domesticat0
Treatment
treatment (20)e0
Outcome
percentage of nitrogen in leaves and leaf areae0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the treatment (20) gave the highest rate in Characteristics (the percentage of nitrogen in leaves and leaf area)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1332–1444 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple Trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–100 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nano fertilizer at concentration 3500 maximized leaf chlorophyll and N, P and K percentages.

Taxon
Apple TreesMalus domesticat0
Treatment
nanocomposite fertilizer with a concentration of (3500)e0
Outcome
content of chlorophyll in the leaves and the percentage of nitrogen, phosphorous and potassium in the leavese0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“spraying with nanocomposite fertilizer with a concentration of (3500), it achieved the highest rate in the characteristics (the content of chlorophyll in the leaves and the percentage of nitrogen, phosphorous and potassium in the leaves)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1470–1707 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple Trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–100 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nano fertilizer concentration 2500 maximized leaf area.

Taxon
Apple TreesMalus domesticat0
Treatment
concentration (2500)e0
Outcome
leaf areae0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“it gave the concentration (2500) the highest rate in the leaf area”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1715–1781 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple Trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–100 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined humic level 40 and nano fertilizer 3500 maximized leaf area, chlorophyll and phosphorus.

Taxon
Apple TreesMalus domesticat0
Treatment
treatment (40) of humic fertilizer and (3500) of the nano-complex fertilizere0
Outcome
leaf area, leaf content of chlorophyll and phosphorous percentage in leavese0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“treatment (40) of humic fertilizer and (3500) of the nano-complex fertilizer achieved the highest rate in most of the studied features, namely (leaf area, leaf content of chlorophyll and phosphorous percentage in leaves)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1894–2114 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple Trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–100 · show in text ↑

fertilization · physiology: pigments · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

30 papers: 24 positive, 6 negative or no effect

23 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

26 papers more in this group

See all 30 papers →

nanoparticle · physiology: pigments · Malus domestica (apple)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.