Paper · 2022 · Journal of Applied Microbiology

Effects of a prothioconazole- and tebuconazole-based fungicide on the yield, silage characteristics, and fungal mycobiota of corn harvested and conserved as whole-crop and high-moisture ear silages

Francesco Ferrero; Simona Prencipe; Ernesto Tabacco; et al.

8
claims
17
verbatim quotes
4
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

AIMS: To analyze the effect of a prothioconazole- and tebuconazole-based fungicide on the yield and silage characteristics of whole-crop corn (WCC) and high-moisture ear corn (HMC) silages and on the fungal community dynamics from the harvest to aerobic exposure. METHODS AND RESULTS: Corn were untreated (NT) or treated (T) with a prothioconazole- and tebuconazole-based fungicide and harvested as WCC and HMC. Silages were conserved for 60 and 160 d and subjected to an aerobic stability test. The fungicide increased the yield per hectare however, it did not affect the main nutritional characteristics of WCC or HMC. The main chemical, fermentative and microbial characteristics, dry matter (DM) losses and aerobic stability were mainly affected by the conservation time, regardless of the treatment. Fusarium, Alternaria, Aspergillus, and Penicillium genera were identified as dominant before ensiling, but Aspergillus and Penicillium became dominant after silo opening and aerobic exposure. Yeast population during ensiling and aerobic deterioration resulted in a simplification, with Pichia and Kazachstania genera being dominant. CONCLUSIONS: The application of fungicide improved the DM, starch, and net energy for lactation (NEL) yield per hectare but had no consistent effect on the microbial and fermentative silage quality and aerobic stability.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fungicide increased corn yield per hectare.

Treatment
a prothioconazole- and tebuconazole-based fungicidee1
Outcome
yield per hectaree0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
untreated (NT)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The fungicide increased the yield per hectare”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 496–541 · show in text ↑
e1

“Corn were untreated (NT) or treated (T) with a prothioconazole- and tebuconazole-based fungicide”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 285–381 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fungicide did not significantly change the main nutritional characteristics of whole-crop or high-moisture ear corn silage.

Treatment
a prothioconazole- and tebuconazole-based fungicidee1
Outcome
main nutritional characteristics of WCC or HMCe0
Direction
did not affecte0
Comparator
untreated (NT)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“it did not affect the main nutritional characteristics of WCC or HMC”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 551–619 · show in text ↑
e1

“Corn were untreated (NT) or treated (T) with a prothioconazole- and tebuconazole-based fungicide”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 285–381 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Conservation time mainly affected silage chemistry, fermentation, microbial characteristics, dry matter losses and aerobic stability.

Treatment
conservation timee0
Outcome
chemical, fermentative and microbial characteristics, dry matter (DM) losses and aerobic stabilitye0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The main chemical, fermentative and microbial characteristics, dry matter (DM) losses and aerobic stability were mainly affected by the conservation time, regardless of the treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 621–803 · show in text ↑
e1

“Corn were untreated (NT) or treated (T) with a prothioconazole- and tebuconazole-based fungicide”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 285–381 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fusarium, Alternaria, Aspergillus and Penicillium dominated the fungal community before ensiling.

Interactor
Fusarium, Alternaria, Aspergillus, and PenicilliumAspergillusPenicilliumFusariumAlternariae0other
Outcome
Fusarium, Alternaria, Aspergillus, and Penicillium genera were identified as dominant before ensilinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Aspergillus
Aspergillus · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Penicillium
Penicillium · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMilo Manica · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium
Fusarium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fusarium, Alternaria, Aspergillus, and Penicillium genera were identified as dominant before ensiling”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 805–906 · show in text ↑
e1

“Corn were untreated (NT) or treated (T) with a prothioconazole- and tebuconazole-based fungicide”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 285–381 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aspergillus and Penicillium dominated after silo opening and aerobic exposure.

Interactor
Aspergillus and PenicilliumAspergillusPenicilliume0other
Outcome
Aspergillus and Penicillium became dominante0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Aspergillus
Aspergillus · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Penicillium
Penicillium · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMilo Manica · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Aspergillus and Penicillium became dominant after silo opening and aerobic exposure”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 912–995 · show in text ↑
e1

“Corn were untreated (NT) or treated (T) with a prothioconazole- and tebuconazole-based fungicide”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 285–381 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pichia and Kazachstania dominated the simplified yeast population during ensiling and aerobic deterioration.

Interactor
Pichia and KazachstaniaPichiaKazachstaniae0other
Outcome
Yeast population during ensiling and aerobic deterioration resulted in a simplificatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pichia
Pichia · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryAjay Kumar Chaurasiya · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Yeast population during ensiling and aerobic deterioration resulted in a simplification, with Pichia and Kazachstania genera being dominant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 997–1136 · show in text ↑
e1

“Corn were untreated (NT) or treated (T) with a prothioconazole- and tebuconazole-based fungicide”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 285–381 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fungicide increased dry matter, starch and net energy yield per hectare.

Treatment
fungicidee0
Outcome
DM, starch, and net energy for lactation (NEL) yield per hectaree0
Direction
improvede0
Comparator
untreated (NT)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The application of fungicide improved the DM, starch, and net energy for lactation (NEL) yield per hectare”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1151–1257 · show in text ↑
e1

“Corn were untreated (NT) or treated (T) with a prothioconazole- and tebuconazole-based fungicide”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 285–381 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fungicide had no consistent effect on microbial or fermentative silage quality or aerobic stability.

Treatment
fungicidet0
Outcome
microbial and fermentative silage quality and aerobic stabilitye0
Direction
no consistent effecte0
Comparator
untreated (NT)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“had no consistent effect on the microbial and fermentative silage quality and aerobic stability”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1262–1357 · show in text ↑
e1

“Corn were untreated (NT) or treated (T) with a prothioconazole- and tebuconazole-based fungicide”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 285–381 · show in text ↑
t0

“fungicide”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–62 · show in text ↑

prothioconazole · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

fungicide · growth · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

34 papers: 19 positive, 15 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

30 papers more in this group

See all 34 papers →

fungicide · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

65 papers: 47 positive, 18 negative or no effect

46 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. no effect

61 papers more in this group

See all 65 papers →

fungicide · quality: postharvest · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

fungicide · organism · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 2 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.