Paper · 2019 · Summa Phytopathologica

Fungicide performance on Fusarium meridionale control, grain yield and grain damage in maize

Maiquiel Diego Fingstag; Ricardo Trezzi Casa; Amauri Bogo; et al.

19
claims
38
verbatim quotes
4
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

ABSTRACT Gibberella ear rot (GER) in maize, caused by Fusarium graminearum species complex, is a destructive disease in southern Brazil and worldwide. Five field-experiments were conducted to determine fungicide efficacy, grain yield and grain quality (study I), as well as response of increasing rates (study II) on GER control, grain yield (GY) and grain damage (GD) in maize during the 2014/15 and 2015/16 growing seasons. Fungicides were sprayed 48 h before (preventive action) or 48 h after (curative action) inoculation of two Fusarium meridionale isolates (PR and MG). Study I consisted in applying nine active ingredients (metconazole, pyraclostrobin, tebuconazole, trifloxystrobin, prothioconazole, thiophanate-methyl, azoxystrobin, cyproconazole and carbendazim) present in eight commercial formulations at two sowing dates. Study II consisted in applying increasing rates of three fungicides evaluated at three sowing dates using only PR isolate. In study I, no differences were observed among fungicides when the variables GER, GY and GD were analyzed together. There were interactions between time of fungicide application and F. meridionale isolates when GER severity and GY were considered. Preventive fungicide application at different sowing dates and the use of MG isolate reduced GER by 11.6% and increased GY by 5.3%, compared to curative application. In study II, there was a significant interaction between fungicides and application time for GER, GY and GD. Preventive application of trifloxystrobin + prothioconazole (0.15 + 0.17 and 0.22 + 0.26 L ha-1), pyraclostrobin + metconazole (0.19 + 0.12 and 0.29 + 0.18 L ha-1) and carbendazim (2 L ha-1) reduced GER by 41 and 50%, 47 and 54%, and 54% at the three sowing dates, respectively. There was an increment of 45.7% and 46.8% in GY when trifloxystrobin + prothioconazole (0.15 + 0.17 and 0.22 + 0.26 L ha-1), respectively, were preventively sprayed at the three sowing dates, compared to the control treatment. Trifloxystrobin + prothiocanazole, pyraclostrobin + metconazole and carbendazim (1.0 and 2.0 L ha-1) preventively sprayed at two rates reduced GD incidence by 53.5 and 48.7%, 47.7 and 57.5%, 48.1 and 50.5%, respectively, for each fungicide and rate, and could be incorporated into a disease management program.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 19

Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Study I found no differences among fungicides across GER, GY and GD jointly.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Outcome
GER, GY and GDe0
Direction
no differencese0
Comparator
among fungicidese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–92 · show in text ↑
e0

“In study I, no differences were observed among fungicides when the variables GER, GY and GD were analyzed together.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 958–1073 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Application timing interacted with F. meridionale isolate for GER severity and yield.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
time of fungicide applicatione0
Interactor
F. meridionaleFusarium meridionalee0pathogen
Outcome
GER severity and GYe0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–92 · show in text ↑
e0

“There were interactions between time of fungicide application and F. meridionale isolates when GER severity and GY were considered.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1074–1205 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Preventive fungicide application with MG isolate reduced GER by 11.6% compared with curative application.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Preventive fungicide applicatione0
Interactor
MG isolatee0pathogen
Outcome
GERe0
Direction
reducede0
Value
11.6%e0
Comparator
curative applicatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–92 · show in text ↑
e0

“Preventive fungicide application at different sowing dates and the use of MG isolate reduced GER by 11.6% and increased GY by 5.3%, compared to curative application.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1206–1371 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Preventive fungicide application with MG isolate increased grain yield by 5.3% compared with curative application.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Preventive fungicide applicatione0
Interactor
MG isolatee0pathogen
Outcome
GYe0
Direction
increasede0
Value
5.3%e0
Comparator
curative applicatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–92 · show in text ↑
e0

“Preventive fungicide application at different sowing dates and the use of MG isolate reduced GER by 11.6% and increased GY by 5.3%, compared to curative application.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1206–1371 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Study II found a significant fungicide by application time interaction for GER, GY and GD.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
fungicides and application timee0
Outcome
GER, GY and GDe0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–92 · show in text ↑
e0

“In study II, there was a significant interaction between fungicides and application time for GER, GY and GD.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1372–1480 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Preventive trifloxystrobin + prothioconazole at 0.15 + 0.17 reduced GER by 41.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
trifloxystrobin + prothioconazolee0
Outcome
GERe0
Direction
reducede0
Value
41e0
Qualifier
0.15 + 0.17e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–92 · show in text ↑
e0

“Preventive application of trifloxystrobin + prothioconazole (0.15 + 0.17 and 0.22 + 0.26 L ha-1), pyraclostrobin + metconazole (0.19 + 0.12 and 0.29 + 0.18 L ha-1) and carbendazim (2 L ha-1) reduced GER by 41 and 50%, 47 and 54%, and 54% at the three sowing dates, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1481–1759 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Preventive trifloxystrobin + prothioconazole at 0.22 + 0.26 L ha-1 reduced GER by 50%.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
trifloxystrobin + prothioconazolee0
Outcome
GERe0
Direction
reducede0
Value
50%e0
Qualifier
0.22 + 0.26 L ha-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–92 · show in text ↑
e0

“Preventive application of trifloxystrobin + prothioconazole (0.15 + 0.17 and 0.22 + 0.26 L ha-1), pyraclostrobin + metconazole (0.19 + 0.12 and 0.29 + 0.18 L ha-1) and carbendazim (2 L ha-1) reduced GER by 41 and 50%, 47 and 54%, and 54% at the three sowing dates, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1481–1759 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Preventive pyraclostrobin + metconazole at 0.19 + 0.12 reduced GER by 47.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
pyraclostrobin + metconazolee0
Outcome
GERe0
Direction
reducede0
Value
47e0
Qualifier
0.19 + 0.12e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–92 · show in text ↑
e0

“Preventive application of trifloxystrobin + prothioconazole (0.15 + 0.17 and 0.22 + 0.26 L ha-1), pyraclostrobin + metconazole (0.19 + 0.12 and 0.29 + 0.18 L ha-1) and carbendazim (2 L ha-1) reduced GER by 41 and 50%, 47 and 54%, and 54% at the three sowing dates, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1481–1759 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Preventive pyraclostrobin + metconazole at 0.29 + 0.18 L ha-1 reduced GER by 54%.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
pyraclostrobin + metconazolee0
Outcome
GERe0
Direction
reducede0
Value
54%e0
Qualifier
0.29 + 0.18 L ha-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–92 · show in text ↑
e0

“Preventive application of trifloxystrobin + prothioconazole (0.15 + 0.17 and 0.22 + 0.26 L ha-1), pyraclostrobin + metconazole (0.19 + 0.12 and 0.29 + 0.18 L ha-1) and carbendazim (2 L ha-1) reduced GER by 41 and 50%, 47 and 54%, and 54% at the three sowing dates, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1481–1759 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Preventive carbendazim at 2 L ha-1 reduced GER by 54%.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
carbendazime0
Outcome
GERe0
Direction
reducede0
Value
54%e0
Qualifier
2 L ha-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–92 · show in text ↑
e0

“Preventive application of trifloxystrobin + prothioconazole (0.15 + 0.17 and 0.22 + 0.26 L ha-1), pyraclostrobin + metconazole (0.19 + 0.12 and 0.29 + 0.18 L ha-1) and carbendazim (2 L ha-1) reduced GER by 41 and 50%, 47 and 54%, and 54% at the three sowing dates, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1481–1759 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Preventive trifloxystrobin plus prothioconazole at 0.15 + 0.17 increased yield by 45.7% over control.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
trifloxystrobin + prothioconazolee0
Outcome
GYe0
Direction
incremente0
Value
45.7%e0
Qualifier
0.15 + 0.17e0
Comparator
control treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–92 · show in text ↑
e0

“There was an increment of 45.7% and 46.8% in GY when trifloxystrobin + prothioconazole (0.15 + 0.17 and 0.22 + 0.26 L ha-1), respectively, were preventively sprayed at the three sowing dates, compared to the control treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1760–1986 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Preventive trifloxystrobin plus prothioconazole at 0.22 + 0.26 L ha-1 increased yield by 46.8% over control.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
trifloxystrobin + prothioconazolee0
Outcome
GYe0
Direction
incremente0
Value
46.8%e0
Qualifier
0.22 + 0.26 L ha-1e0
Comparator
control treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–92 · show in text ↑
e0

“There was an increment of 45.7% and 46.8% in GY when trifloxystrobin + prothioconazole (0.15 + 0.17 and 0.22 + 0.26 L ha-1), respectively, were preventively sprayed at the three sowing dates, compared to the control treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1760–1986 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Preventive Trifloxystrobin + prothiocanazole reduced GD incidence by 53.5.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Trifloxystrobin + prothiocanazolee0
Outcome
GD incidencee0
Direction
reducede0
Value
53.5e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–92 · show in text ↑
e0

“Trifloxystrobin + prothiocanazole, pyraclostrobin + metconazole and carbendazim (1.0 and 2.0 L ha-1) preventively sprayed at two rates reduced GD incidence by 53.5 and 48.7%, 47.7 and 57.5%, 48.1 and 50.5%, respectively, for each fungicide and rate, and could be incorporated into a disease management program.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1987–2297 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Preventive Trifloxystrobin + prothiocanazole reduced GD incidence by 48.7%.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Trifloxystrobin + prothiocanazolee0
Outcome
GD incidencee0
Direction
reducede0
Value
48.7%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–92 · show in text ↑
e0

“Trifloxystrobin + prothiocanazole, pyraclostrobin + metconazole and carbendazim (1.0 and 2.0 L ha-1) preventively sprayed at two rates reduced GD incidence by 53.5 and 48.7%, 47.7 and 57.5%, 48.1 and 50.5%, respectively, for each fungicide and rate, and could be incorporated into a disease management program.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1987–2297 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Preventive pyraclostrobin + metconazole reduced GD incidence by 47.7.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
pyraclostrobin + metconazolee0
Outcome
GD incidencee0
Direction
reducede0
Value
47.7e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–92 · show in text ↑
e0

“Trifloxystrobin + prothiocanazole, pyraclostrobin + metconazole and carbendazim (1.0 and 2.0 L ha-1) preventively sprayed at two rates reduced GD incidence by 53.5 and 48.7%, 47.7 and 57.5%, 48.1 and 50.5%, respectively, for each fungicide and rate, and could be incorporated into a disease management program.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1987–2297 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Preventive pyraclostrobin + metconazole reduced GD incidence by 57.5%.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
pyraclostrobin + metconazolee0
Outcome
GD incidencee0
Direction
reducede0
Value
57.5%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–92 · show in text ↑
e0

“Trifloxystrobin + prothiocanazole, pyraclostrobin + metconazole and carbendazim (1.0 and 2.0 L ha-1) preventively sprayed at two rates reduced GD incidence by 53.5 and 48.7%, 47.7 and 57.5%, 48.1 and 50.5%, respectively, for each fungicide and rate, and could be incorporated into a disease management program.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1987–2297 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Preventive carbendazim reduced GD incidence by 48.1.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
carbendazime0
Outcome
GD incidencee0
Direction
reducede0
Value
48.1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–92 · show in text ↑
e0

“Trifloxystrobin + prothiocanazole, pyraclostrobin + metconazole and carbendazim (1.0 and 2.0 L ha-1) preventively sprayed at two rates reduced GD incidence by 53.5 and 48.7%, 47.7 and 57.5%, 48.1 and 50.5%, respectively, for each fungicide and rate, and could be incorporated into a disease management program.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1987–2297 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Preventive carbendazim reduced GD incidence by 50.5%.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
carbendazime0
Outcome
GD incidencee0
Direction
reducede0
Value
50.5%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–92 · show in text ↑
e0

“Trifloxystrobin + prothiocanazole, pyraclostrobin + metconazole and carbendazim (1.0 and 2.0 L ha-1) preventively sprayed at two rates reduced GD incidence by 53.5 and 48.7%, 47.7 and 57.5%, 48.1 and 50.5%, respectively, for each fungicide and rate, and could be incorporated into a disease management program.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1987–2297 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The tested fungicides could be incorporated into a disease management program.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Trifloxystrobin + prothiocanazole, pyraclostrobin + metconazole and carbendazime0
Outcome
incorporated into a disease management programe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–92 · show in text ↑
e0

“Trifloxystrobin + prothiocanazole, pyraclostrobin + metconazole and carbendazim (1.0 and 2.0 L ha-1) preventively sprayed at two rates reduced GD incidence by 53.5 and 48.7%, 47.7 and 57.5%, 48.1 and 50.5%, respectively, for each fungicide and rate, and could be incorporated into a disease management program.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1987–2297 · show in text ↑

pyraclostrobin · disease · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 6 positive, 2 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

carbendazim · disease · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 12 positive, 1 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

pyraclostrobin · pest · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

carbendazim · pest · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

metconazole · disease · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

prothioconazole · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

trifloxystrobin · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

trifloxystrobin · disease · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

8 of 11 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.