Abstract
This work was carried out in order to evaluate the effects of fungicides on the control of maize gray leafspot and maize white spot and its implications on the grain yield and kernel rot, and also to establish the relationshipbetween grain yield and disease severity. Twelve commercial single cross hybrids were evaluated in a randomizedblock design with three replications. Five evaluations of disease severity were performed using a visual symptomsscale, ranging from 1 (highly resistant) to 9 (highly susceptible). Fungicide application was effective in the control ofmaize leaf diseases, and the reduced incidence of kernel rot provided on average 12% increased grain yield comparedto the control treatment. Maize gray leaf spot and maize white spot reduced maize grain yield, and this reduction wasgreater when diseases occurred earlier. Maize gray leaf spot caused higher decrease in grain yield than white spot.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-sa. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 7
Claim · model-written summary
Fungicide application controlled maize leaf diseases.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Fungicide application was effective in the control ofmaize leaf diseases”
Claim · model-written summary
Fungicide treatment reduced kernel rot incidence.
- Treatment
- Fungicide applicatione0
- Outcome
- incidence of kernel rote1
- Direction
- reducede1
- Comparator
- control treatmente1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“MAIZE”
e0“Fungicide application was effective”
e1“the reduced incidence of kernel rot provided on average 12% increased grain yield comparedto the control treatment”
Claim · model-written summary
Fungicide treatment increased grain yield by 12% compared with control.
- Treatment
- Fungicide applicatione0
- Outcome
- grain yielde1
- Direction
- increasede1
- Value
- 12%e1
- Comparator
- control treatmente1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“MAIZE”
e0“Fungicide application was effective”
e1“the reduced incidence of kernel rot provided on average 12% increased grain yield comparedto the control treatment”
Claim · model-written summary
Maize gray leaf spot reduced grain yield.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Maize gray leaf spot and maize white spot reduced maize grain yield”
Claim · model-written summary
Maize white spot reduced grain yield.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Maize gray leaf spot and maize white spot reduced maize grain yield”
Claim · model-written summary
Yield reduction was greater when disease occurred earlier.
- Outcome
- reductione0
- Direction
- greatere0
- Qualifier
- diseases occurred earliere0
- Setting
- diseases occurred earliere0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“MAIZE”
e0“this reduction wasgreater when diseases occurred earlier”
Claim · model-written summary
Gray leaf spot decreased maize grain yield more than white spot.
- Interactor
- Maize gray leaf spote0pathogen
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Direction
- higher decreasee0
- Comparator
- white spote0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Maize gray leaf spot caused higher decrease in grain yield than white spot”
The same questions in other papers
fungicide · disease · Zea mays (maize)Results differ
52 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- no effect
59 papers more in this group
See all 63 papers →fungicide · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ
46 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
61 papers more in this group
See all 65 papers →fungicide · organism · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.