Abstract
Optimum usage of fertilizers is an important factor that defines the fate of crop yield by confirming the accessibility of nutrients in soil. Imbalance use of fertilizer not only reduces the crop productivity but also adversely affects the soil properties. A one-year experiment was carried out to explore the impact of different levels of farm yard manure and urea on soil properties, growth and yield of wheat crop. Treatments were application of nitrogen at i) 125 kg ha -1 from urea, ii) 80 kg ha -1 of nitrogen from urea + 10 tons of farm yard manure ha -1 and iii) 20 tons of farm yard manure ha -1 . Wheat cultivar Sehar-2006 was used in the experiment. All the treatments’ combination affected crop growth, economic yield and soil properties. However, maximum positive impact of combined use of farm yard manure and urea was observed. Results indicated that productive tillers per unit area (16%), plant height, number of spikelets per spike (12.5%) and economical yield (11%) were greatly enhanced by combined usage of urea and farm yard manure as compared to sole application of urea. Combined application of urea and farm yard manure also positively affected the soil bulk density, particle density, percent porosity and soil saturated hydraulic conductivity as compared to either sole use of urea or farm yard manure. Combined usage of farm yard manure and urea are suggested better to produce higher economical yield along with improved soil properties.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 7
Claim · model-written summary
Combined urea and farmyard manure increased productive tillers per unit area by 16% versus urea alone.
- Taxon
- Wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Treatment
- combined usage of urea and farm yard manuree0
- Outcome
- productive tillers per unit areae0
- Direction
- enhancede0
- Value
- 16%e0
- Comparator
- sole application of ureae0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“productive tillers per unit area (16%), plant height, number of spikelets per spike (12.5%) and economical yield (11%) were greatly enhanced by combined usage of urea and farm yard manure as compared to sole application of urea”
t0“Wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Combined urea and farmyard manure increased plant height versus urea alone.
- Taxon
- WheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- combined usage of urea and farm yard manuree0
- Outcome
- plant heighte0
- Direction
- enhancede0
- Comparator
- sole application of ureae0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“productive tillers per unit area (16%), plant height, number of spikelets per spike (12.5%) and economical yield (11%) were greatly enhanced by combined usage of urea and farm yard manure as compared to sole application of urea”
t0“Wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Combined urea and farmyard manure increased spikelets per spike by 12.5% versus urea alone.
- Taxon
- WheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- combined usage of urea and farm yard manuree0
- Outcome
- number of spikelets per spikee0
- Direction
- enhancede0
- Value
- 12.5%e0
- Comparator
- sole application of ureae0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“productive tillers per unit area (16%), plant height, number of spikelets per spike (12.5%) and economical yield (11%) were greatly enhanced by combined usage of urea and farm yard manure as compared to sole application of urea”
t0“Wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Combined urea and farmyard manure increased economic yield by 11% versus urea alone.
- Taxon
- WheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- combined usage of urea and farm yard manuree0
- Outcome
- economical yielde0
- Direction
- enhancede0
- Value
- 11%e0
- Comparator
- sole application of ureae0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“productive tillers per unit area (16%), plant height, number of spikelets per spike (12.5%) and economical yield (11%) were greatly enhanced by combined usage of urea and farm yard manure as compared to sole application of urea”
t0“Wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Combined urea and farmyard manure improved soil bulk density, particle density and porosity versus either fertilizer alone.
- Taxon
- WheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- Combined application of urea and farm yard manuree0
- Outcome
- soil bulk density, particle density, percent porositye0
- Direction
- positively affectede0
- Comparator
- either sole use of urea or farm yard manuree0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Combined application of urea and farm yard manure also positively affected the soil bulk density, particle density, percent porosity and soil saturated hydraulic conductivity as compared to either sole use of urea or farm yard manure.”
t0“Wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Combined urea and farmyard manure improved soil saturated hydraulic conductivity versus either fertilizer alone.
- Taxon
- WheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- Combined application of urea and farm yard manuree0
- Outcome
- soil saturated hydraulic conductivitye0
- Direction
- positively affectede0
- Comparator
- either sole use of urea or farm yard manuree0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Combined application of urea and farm yard manure also positively affected the soil bulk density, particle density, percent porosity and soil saturated hydraulic conductivity as compared to either sole use of urea or farm yard manure.”
t0“Wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors recommend combined manure and urea for higher economic yield and improved soil properties.
- Taxon
- WheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Outcome
- Combined usage of farm yard manure and ureae0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Combined usage of farm yard manure and urea are suggested better to produce higher economical yield along with improved soil properties.”
t0“Wheat”
The same questions in other papers
fertilization · soil: physics · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ
84 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- negative
94 papers more in this group
See all 98 papers →nitrogen · soil: physics · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
30 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- negative
37 papers more in this group
See all 41 papers →nitrogen · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
425 papers in the same direction as this paper · 116 in the opposite direction · 9 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- negative
547 papers more in this group
See all 551 papers →fertilization · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
662 papers in the same direction as this paper · 89 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
751 papers more in this group
See all 755 papers →nitrogen · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
1,736 papers in the same direction as this paper · 285 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- negative
- negative
2,057 papers more in this group
See all 2,061 papers →fertilization · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
3,114 papers in the same direction as this paper · 284 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- no effect
3,434 papers more in this group
See all 3,438 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.