Paper · 2005 · Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science

Use of organic manure with mineral N fertilizer increases wheat yield at Rawalakot Azad Jammu and Kashmir

M Jamraiz Kiani; M Kaleem Abbasi; Nasir Rahim

13
claims
26
verbatim quotes
40
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted to examine the effect of the integrated use of organic and mineral N fertilizer on the yield and yield attributes of wheat. Treatments included: Control; full recommended mineral N (120 kg ha − 1); 90 kg mineral N + farm yard manure (FYM); ½ mineral N + ½FYM, 30 kg mineral N + FYM; full dose of FYM alone. Wheat variety Inqulab-91 was used as a testing crop. Results indicated a significant response of wheat to both mineral and organic N fertilization. The morphological characteristics of the crop increased significantly with N fertilization. The maximum response was observed at the highest N rate (mineral N 150 kg N + 120 kg P2O5 ha − 1). In comparison to control, combinations of organic and mineral N increased most of the traits significantly, but generally had a non-significant difference among each other. Single or combined application of mineral N fertilizer with FYM increased grain yield significantly over control. A maximum of 72% increase in yield was recorded at the highest N application rate applied with P (150 kg N + 120 kg P2O5 ha − 1). The recommended level of N (120 kg N ha − 1) applied in T2 increased grain yield by 24% while an 11% increase in yield was recorded in T6 where FYM was applied alone. Integrated use of mineral N + FYM had a significant effect and a maximum of 35% increase in yield was recorded in T4 where ½ mineral N + ½ FYM were applied. The economic analysis of data showed that the treatment T4 had an economical net return of Rs. 1776 with a VCR of 8.39 and therefore recommended for Rawalakot conditions. This study indicates that the combination of mineral fertilizers with organic manures helps in increasing the yield of wheat and implies a savings of almost 50% cost compared to a system with only mineral N application.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat responded significantly to mineral and organic N fertilization.

Treatment
mineral and organic N fertilizatione0
Outcome
response of wheate0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Results indicated a significant response of wheat to both mineral and organic N fertilization.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 393–487 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

N fertilization significantly increased crop morphological traits.

Treatment
N fertilizatione0
Outcome
morphological characteristicse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The morphological characteristics of the crop increased significantly with N fertilization.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 488–579 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–63 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest N rate produced the maximum response.

Treatment
mineral N 150 kg N + 120 kg P2O5 ha − 1e0
Outcome
maximum responsee0
Direction
maximume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The maximum response was observed at the highest N rate (mineral N 150 kg N + 120 kg P2O5 ha − 1).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 580–678 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–63 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic and mineral N combinations significantly increased most traits over control, with generally nonsignificant differences among combinations.

Treatment
combinations of organic and mineral Ne0
Outcome
most of the traitse0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In comparison to control, combinations of organic and mineral N increased most of the traits significantly, but generally had a non-significant difference among each other.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 679–851 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–63 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Single or combined mineral N and FYM significantly increased grain yield over control.

Treatment
Single or combined application of mineral N fertilizer with FYMe0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Single or combined application of mineral N fertilizer with FYM increased grain yield significantly over control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 852–965 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–63 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest N-plus-P rate increased yield 72%.

Treatment
150 kg N + 120 kg P2O5 ha − 1e0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
72%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A maximum of 72% increase in yield was recorded at the highest N application rate applied with P (150 kg N + 120 kg P2O5 ha − 1).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 966–1095 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–63 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Recommended N level in T2 increased grain yield by 24%.

Treatment
120 kg N ha − 1e0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
24%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The recommended level of N (120 kg N ha − 1) applied in T2 increased grain yield by 24%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1096–1183 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–63 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

FYM alone in T6 increased yield by 11%.

Treatment
FYM was applied alonee0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
11%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“an 11% increase in yield was recorded in T6 where FYM was applied alone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1190–1261 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–63 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Half mineral N plus half FYM in T4 increased yield by up to 35%.

Treatment
½ mineral N + ½ FYMe0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
35%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a maximum of 35% increase in yield was recorded in T4 where ½ mineral N + ½ FYM were applied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1326–1418 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–63 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T4 produced a net return of Rs. 1776.

Treatment
T4e0
Outcome
economical net returne0
Value
Rs. 1776e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the treatment T4 had an economical net return of Rs. 1776”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1462–1519 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–63 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T4 had a value-cost ratio of 8.39.

Treatment
T4e0
Outcome
VCRe0
Value
8.39e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the treatment T4 had an economical net return of Rs. 1776 with a VCR of 8.39”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1462–1538 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–63 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend T4 for Rawalakot conditions.

Treatment
T4e1
Outcome
recommended for Rawalakot conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“therefore recommended for Rawalakot conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1543–1589 · show in text ↑
e1

“the treatment T4 had an economical net return”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1462–1507 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–63 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combining mineral and organic fertilizer implied almost 50% lower cost than mineral N alone.

Outcome
savings of almost 50% coste0
Value
almost 50%e0
Comparator
a system with only mineral N applicatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“implies a savings of almost 50% cost compared to a system with only mineral N application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1720–1809 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–63 · show in text ↑

phosphorus · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

572 papers: 524 positive, 48 negative or no effect

523 papers in the same direction as this paper · 43 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

568 papers more in this group

See all 572 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

2,061 papers: 1,737 positive, 324 negative or no effect

1,736 papers in the same direction as this paper · 285 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2,057 papers more in this group

See all 2,061 papers →

fertilization · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3,438 papers: 3,115 positive, 323 negative or no effect

3,114 papers in the same direction as this paper · 284 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3,434 papers more in this group

See all 3,438 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.