Paper · 1998 · Australian Journal of Agricultural Research

'Haying-off', the negative grain yield response of dryland wheat to nitrogen fertiliser. I. Biomass, grain yield, and water use

A. F. van Herwaarden; G. D. Farquhar; J. F. Angus; et al.

20
claims
40
verbatim quotes
319
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

"Haying-off" was studied by comparing wheat responses to applied nitrogen (N) at 3 sites in southern New South Wales, which differed in the amount and timing of rainfall during crop growth. At a site where the crops encountered little water deficit, dry grain yield increased from 607 g/m2 for a low-N control crop to 798 g/m2 for a high-N crop. At a site with severe terminal drought, dry grain yield decreased 24% from 374 g/m2 for the control, to 284 g/m2 for the highest N crop. At the third site, yields increased with small applications of N, whereas greater applications resulted in a negative yield response. At the 2 latter sites, the crops that showed decreased yield with applied N had clearly hayed-off. At all sites, irrespective of water status, N application resulted in increases in biomass at anthesis, spike density, kernels per spike, and kernel number. Kernel weight decreased in response to additional N at all sites, but most markedly at the haying-off sites, where it decreased by up to 38%. Harvest index increased in response to N at the high-rainfall site, but decreased in crops that hayed-off. Grain protein increased in response to N at all sites, with a range from 9% to 18% at the haying-off sites. The apparent retranslocation of assimilates to grain contributed 37-39% of grain yield (depending on N supply) at the high-rainfall site, compared with 75-100% at the haying-off sites. In contrast, when apparent retranslocation was expressed in relation to biomass at anthesis, it remained relatively constant, amounting to 23-26% at the high-rainfall site and 24-28% when crops hayed-off. By anthesis, high-N crops extracted more soil water than the low-N crops. By maturity the most severely hayed-off crop had extracted 10 mm less soil water than a low-N crop, but at the high rainfall site the high-N crops extracted 20 mm more soil water than the control crops. The weather conditions between anthesis and physiological maturity were relatively mild, with no daily maximum temperatures above 30ºC and no sudden increases in evaporative demand. Thus, there appeared to be 3 processes leading to haying-off. Firstly, the results confirm previous studies showing that haying-off was associated with reduced post-anthesis assimilation in response to a lack of soil water. The water deffcit was due to vigorous vegetative growth stimulated by a high level of soil N and was not associated with heat shocks or sudden increases in evaporation. Secondly, the most severely hayed-off crop failed to extract soil water fully, leading to a further reduction in post-anthesis assimilation. Thirdly, there was inadequate apparent retranslocation of pre-anthesis reserves to compensate for the lack of post-anthesis assimilation.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 20

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At the site with little water deficit, high nitrogen increased dry grain yield from 607 to 798 g/m2.

Treatment
high-N crope0
Outcome
dry grain yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
798 g/m2e0
Qualifier
607 g/m2e0
Comparator
low-N control crope0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At a site where the crops encountered little water deficit, dry grain yield increased from 607 g/m2 for a low-N control crop to 798 g/m2 for a high-N crop.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 190–345 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under severe terminal drought, highest nitrogen decreased grain yield 24% from 374 to 284 g/m2.

Treatment
highest N crope0
Outcome
dry grain yielde0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
24%e0
Qualifier
severe terminal droughte0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At a site with severe terminal drought, dry grain yield decreased 24% from 374 g/m2 for the control, to 284 g/m2 for the highest N crop.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 346–482 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At the third site, small nitrogen applications increased yield.

Treatment
small applications of Ne0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At the third site, yields increased with small applications of N”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 483–547 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At the third site, greater nitrogen applications reduced yield.

Treatment
greater applicationse0
Outcome
yield responsee0
Direction
negativee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“greater applications resulted in a negative yield response.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 557–616 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen increased biomass at anthesis at all sites.

Treatment
N applicatione0
Outcome
biomass at anthesise0
Direction
increasese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At all sites, irrespective of water status, N application resulted in increases in biomass at anthesis, spike density, kernels per spike, and kernel number.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 716–872 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen increased spike density, kernels per spike, and kernel number at all sites.

Treatment
N applicatione0
Outcome
spike density, kernels per spike, and kernel numbere0
Direction
increasese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At all sites, irrespective of water status, N application resulted in increases in biomass at anthesis, spike density, kernels per spike, and kernel number.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 716–872 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Additional nitrogen decreased kernel weight at all sites, by up to 38% at haying-off sites.

Treatment
additional Ne0
Outcome
Kernel weighte0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
up to 38%e0
Qualifier
haying-off sitese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Kernel weight decreased in response to additional N at all sites, but most markedly at the haying-off sites, where it decreased by up to 38%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 873–1014 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen increased harvest index at the high-rainfall site.

Treatment
Ne0
Outcome
Harvest indexe0
Direction
increasede0
Setting
high-rainfall sitee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Harvest index increased in response to N at the high-rainfall site”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1015–1081 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–64 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Harvest index decreased in crops that hayed-off.

Outcome
Harvest indexe0
Direction
decreasede0
Qualifier
crops that hayed-offe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Harvest index increased in response to N at the high-rainfall site, but decreased in crops that hayed-off.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1015–1121 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen increased grain protein at all sites, reaching 9% to 18% at haying-off sites.

Treatment
Ne0
Outcome
Grain proteine0
Direction
increasede0
Value
9% to 18%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grain protein increased in response to N at all sites, with a range from 9% to 18% at the haying-off sites.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1122–1229 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–64 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Apparent retranslocation contributed 37-39% of grain yield at the high-rainfall site.

Outcome
apparent retranslocation of assimilates to graine0
Value
37-39%e0
Setting
high-rainfall sitee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The apparent retranslocation of assimilates to grain contributed 37-39% of grain yield (depending on N supply) at the high-rainfall site”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1230–1366 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–64 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Apparent retranslocation contributed 75-100% of grain yield at haying-off sites.

Outcome
apparent retranslocatione0
Value
75-100%e0
Setting
haying-off sitese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The apparent retranslocation of assimilates to grain contributed 37-39% of grain yield (depending on N supply) at the high-rainfall site, compared with 75-100% at the haying-off sites.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1230–1414 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–64 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Relative to anthesis biomass, apparent retranslocation was 23-26% at the high-rainfall site.

Outcome
apparent retranslocatione0
Value
23-26%e0
Setting
high-rainfall sitee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“when apparent retranslocation was expressed in relation to biomass at anthesis, it remained relatively constant, amounting to 23-26% at the high-rainfall site”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1428–1586 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–64 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Relative to anthesis biomass, apparent retranslocation was 24-28% in haying-off crops.

Outcome
apparent retranslocatione0
Value
24-28%e0
Qualifier
crops hayed-offe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“when apparent retranslocation was expressed in relation to biomass at anthesis, it remained relatively constant, amounting to 23-26% at the high-rainfall site and 24-28% when crops hayed-off.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1428–1619 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

By anthesis, high-nitrogen crops extracted more soil water than low-nitrogen crops.

Treatment
high-N cropse0
Outcome
soil watere0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
low-N cropse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“By anthesis, high-N crops extracted more soil water than the low-N crops.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1620–1693 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

By maturity, the most severely hayed-off crop extracted 10 mm less soil water than a low-nitrogen crop.

Treatment
most severely hayed-off crope0
Outcome
soil watere0
Direction
lesse0
Value
10 mme0
Comparator
low-N crope0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“By maturity the most severely hayed-off crop had extracted 10 mm less soil water than a low-N crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1694–1792 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At the high rainfall site, high-nitrogen crops extracted 20 mm more soil water than controls.

Treatment
high-N cropse0
Outcome
soil watere0
Direction
moree0
Value
20 mme0
Comparator
control cropse0
Setting
high rainfall sitee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“at the high rainfall site the high-N crops extracted 20 mm more soil water than the control crops.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1798–1896 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–64 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Haying-off was associated with reduced post-anthesis assimilation due to lack of soil water.

Treatment
haying-offe0
Outcome
post-anthesis assimilatione0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
lack of soil watere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“haying-off was associated with reduced post-anthesis assimilation in response to a lack of soil water.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2200–2302 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–64 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vigorous vegetative growth stimulated by high soil nitrogen caused the water deficit.

Outcome
water deffcite0
Qualifier
vigorous vegetative growth stimulated by a high level of soil Ne0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The water deffcit was due to vigorous vegetative growth stimulated by a high level of soil N”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2303–2395 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–64 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inadequate pre-anthesis reserve retranslocation failed to compensate for lost post-anthesis assimilation.

Outcome
lack of post-anthesis assimilatione0
Qualifier
inadequate apparent retranslocation of pre-anthesis reservese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“there was inadequate apparent retranslocation of pre-anthesis reserves to compensate for the lack of post-anthesis assimilation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2622–2750 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–64 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · soil: physics · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

41 papers: 31 positive, 10 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 31 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

37 papers more in this group

See all 41 papers →

nitrogen · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

454 papers: 400 positive, 54 negative or no effect

399 papers in the same direction as this paper · 47 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

450 papers more in this group

See all 454 papers →

nitrogen · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

551 papers: 426 positive, 125 negative or no effect

425 papers in the same direction as this paper · 116 in the opposite direction · 9 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

547 papers more in this group

See all 551 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

2,061 papers: 1,737 positive, 324 negative or no effect

1,736 papers in the same direction as this paper · 285 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

2,057 papers more in this group

See all 2,061 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.