Paper · 2022 · Phyton

The Potential Efficacy of Glycyrrhizic Acid and Its Nanostructure Against Brown Rot of Peach fruits

Tahsin Shoala; Basma H. Amin; Ismail A. S. Rashid; et al.

10
claims
20
verbatim quotes
1
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Production of peaches (Prunus persica (L.) Batsch) for both local market and export is increasing each year in Egypt. Brown rot disease, caused by Monilinia laxa and Monilinia fructigena, is considered one of the most important postharvest rots affecting peaches in Egypt and economic losses are increasing. Antifungal activity of glycyrrhizic acid nanoparticles (GA-NPs) and glycyrrhizic acid (GA) at 0.2 and 0.4 mmol/L was investigated as a control for both these brown rot pathogens on peach fruits in both in vitro and in vivo studies. In the in vitro studies, GA-NPs were the most effective as shown by the ability to decrease linear growth of both brown rot pathogens in potato dextrose agar (PDA) amended with 0.4 mmol/L GA-NPs. Micrographs of M. fructigena exposed to 0.4 mmol/LGA showed mycelial deformations, nodule formation, detachment of the cell wall, shrinkage and inhomogeneous cytoplasmic materials with large vacuoles. Mycelium of M. laxa exposed to 0.4 mmol/ LGA-NPs resulted in thinner and distorted hyphae, nodule formation, cell wall thinning, and swellings. The GANPs and GA treatments improved fruit quality by maintaining firmness and total soluble solids (TSS). GA-NPs were more effective in decreasing decay incidence than their bulk material. The 0.4 mmol/L GA-NPs completely inhibited the disease on naturally infected peach fruits for both seasons of 2018 and 2019. Furthermore, 0.4 mmol/L GA-NPs reduced the disease incidence in inoculated fruits by 95 (M. laxa) and 88% (M. fructigena) in 2018 season and 96 (M. laxa) and 85% (M. fructigena) in 2019 season. In conclusion, GA-NPs could enhance the resistance of peaches against brown rot caused by M. laxa and M. fructigena.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GA nanoparticles at 0.4 mmol/L most effectively decreased linear growth of both brown rot pathogens in vitro.

Taxon
peaches (Prunus persica (L.) Batsch)Prunus persicat0
Treatment
0.4 mmol/L GA-NPse0
Outcome
linear growth of both brown rot pathogense0
Direction
decreasee0
Setting
potato dextrose agar (PDA)e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“GA-NPs were the most effective as shown by the ability to decrease linear growth of both brown rot pathogens in potato dextrose agar (PDA) amended with 0.4 mmol/L GA-NPs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 565–734 · show in text ↑
t0

“peaches (Prunus persica (L.) Batsch)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 14–50 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bulk GA deformed M. fructigena mycelia at 0.4 mmol/L.

Taxon
peaches (Prunus persica (L.) Batsch)Prunus persicat0
Treatment
0.4 mmol/LGAe0
Interactor
M. fructigenaMonilinia fructigenae0pathogen
Outcome
mycelial deformations, nodule formation, detachment of the cell wall, shrinkage and inhomogeneous cytoplasmic materials with large vacuolese0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Monilinia fructigena
Monilinia fructigena · InteractorSanja565658 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Micrographs of M. fructigena exposed to 0.4 mmol/LGA showed mycelial deformations, nodule formation, detachment of the cell wall, shrinkage and inhomogeneous cytoplasmic materials with large vacuoles.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 736–936 · show in text ↑
t0

“peaches (Prunus persica (L.) Batsch)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 14–50 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GA nanoparticles at 0.4 mmol/L distorted M. laxa hyphae.

Taxon
peaches (Prunus persica (L.) Batsch)Prunus persicat0
Treatment
0.4 mmol/ LGA-NPse0
Interactor
M. laxaMonilinia laxae0pathogen
Outcome
thinner and distorted hyphae, nodule formation, cell wall thinning, and swellingse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Monilinia laxa
Monilinia laxa · InteractorArthuc01 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mycelium of M. laxa exposed to 0.4 mmol/ LGA-NPs resulted in thinner and distorted hyphae, nodule formation, cell wall thinning, and swellings.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 937–1080 · show in text ↑
t0

“peaches (Prunus persica (L.) Batsch)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 14–50 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GA nanoparticles and bulk GA maintained peach fruit firmness and soluble solids.

Taxon
peaches (Prunus persica (L.) Batsch)Prunus persicat0
Treatment
GANPs and GA treatmentse0
Outcome
firmness and total soluble solids (TSS)e0
Direction
maintaininge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The GANPs and GA treatments improved fruit quality by maintaining firmness and total soluble solids (TSS).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1081–1187 · show in text ↑
t0

“peaches (Prunus persica (L.) Batsch)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 14–50 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GA nanoparticles decreased decay incidence more than bulk GA.

Taxon
peaches (Prunus persica (L.) Batsch)Prunus persicat0
Treatment
GA-NPse0
Outcome
decay incidencee0
Direction
decreasinge0
Comparator
their bulk materiale0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“GA-NPs were more effective in decreasing decay incidence than their bulk material.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1188–1270 · show in text ↑
t0

“peaches (Prunus persica (L.) Batsch)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 14–50 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 0.4 mmol/L, GA nanoparticles completely inhibited brown rot on naturally infected peaches in 2018 and 2019.

Taxon
peaches (Prunus persica (L.) Batsch)Prunus persicat0
Treatment
0.4 mmol/L GA-NPse0
Outcome
the disease on naturally infected peach fruitse0
Direction
completely inhibitede0
Value
2018 and 2019e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The 0.4 mmol/L GA-NPs completely inhibited the disease on naturally infected peach fruits for both seasons of 2018 and 2019.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1271–1395 · show in text ↑
t0

“peaches (Prunus persica (L.) Batsch)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 14–50 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GA nanoparticles reduced M. laxa disease incidence by 95 in inoculated fruit in 2018.

Taxon
peaches (Prunus persica (L.) Batsch)Prunus persicat0
Treatment
0.4 mmol/L GA-NPse0
Interactor
M. laxaMonilinia laxae0pathogen
Outcome
disease incidence in inoculated fruitse0
Direction
reducede0
Value
95e0
Qualifier
2018 seasone0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Monilinia laxa
Monilinia laxa · InteractorArthuc01 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“0.4 mmol/L GA-NPs reduced the disease incidence in inoculated fruits by 95 (M. laxa) and 88% (M. fructigena) in 2018 season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1409–1532 · show in text ↑
t0

“peaches (Prunus persica (L.) Batsch)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 14–50 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GA nanoparticles reduced M. fructigena disease incidence by 88% in inoculated fruit in 2018.

Taxon
peaches (Prunus persica (L.) Batsch)Prunus persicat0
Treatment
0.4 mmol/L GA-NPse0
Interactor
M. fructigenaMonilinia fructigenae0pathogen
Outcome
disease incidence in inoculated fruitse0
Direction
reducede0
Value
88%e0
Qualifier
2018 seasone0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Monilinia fructigena
Monilinia fructigena · InteractorSanja565658 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“0.4 mmol/L GA-NPs reduced the disease incidence in inoculated fruits by 95 (M. laxa) and 88% (M. fructigena) in 2018 season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1409–1532 · show in text ↑
t0

“peaches (Prunus persica (L.) Batsch)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 14–50 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GA nanoparticles reduced M. laxa disease incidence by 96 in inoculated fruit in 2019.

Taxon
peaches (Prunus persica (L.) Batsch)Prunus persicat0
Interactor
M. laxaMonilinia laxae0pathogen
Outcome
M. laxae0
Value
96e0
Qualifier
2019 seasone0

Not reportedTreatmentComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Monilinia laxa
Monilinia laxa · InteractorArthuc01 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“96 (M. laxa) and 85% (M. fructigena) in 2019 season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1537–1588 · show in text ↑
t0

“peaches (Prunus persica (L.) Batsch)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 14–50 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GA nanoparticles reduced M. fructigena disease incidence by 85% in inoculated fruit in 2019.

Taxon
peaches (Prunus persica (L.) Batsch)Prunus persicat0
Treatment
0.4 mmol/L GA-NPse0
Interactor
M. fructigenaMonilinia fructigenae0pathogen
Outcome
disease incidence in inoculated fruitse0
Direction
reducede0
Value
85%e0
Qualifier
2019 seasone0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Monilinia fructigena
Monilinia fructigena · InteractorSanja565658 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Furthermore, 0.4 mmol/L GA-NPs reduced the disease incidence in inoculated fruits by 95 (M. laxa) and 88% (M. fructigena) in 2018 season and 96 (M. laxa) and 85% (M. fructigena) in 2019 season.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1396–1589 · show in text ↑
t0

“peaches (Prunus persica (L.) Batsch)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 14–50 · show in text ↑

Gibberellic acid · disease · Prunus persica (peach)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Gibberellic acid · quality: sugar starch · Prunus persica (peach)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

nanoparticle · disease · Prunus persica (peach)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.