Paper · 2022 · Biochemical and Cellular Archives/Biochemical and cellular archives

The response of barley varieties and its companion weed to spraying with chemical herbicides

Nesoor Adil Jassem; Suhad Mathkoor A. Safi

4
claims
10
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A field experiment was carried out to evaluate the efficiency of selected weed herbicides in controlling the growing weed with barley.The experiment was carried out using randomized complete block design, by split plots arrangement with three replicates. The results showed the superiority of the mixture of herbicides (U 46 1 L.ha-1) + (Axial 1.5 L.ha-1) (H1 ) by giving the best weed control, where this treatment reduced the number of weeds in the experiment to give 0.00 plant.m-2. It also gave the best control percentages by 100% that was reflected in giving the best grain yield of 1.57 ton.ha-1, whose results were close to the treatment of hand weeding. Besides, the variety Iba 265 achieved the best results compared to the other varieties used in the study, as it gave the highest grain yield of 1.82 ton.ha-1 compared to the control treatment which gave the lowest grain yield amounted to 0.98 ton.ha-1.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The U 46 plus Axial mixture reduced weed density to 0.00 plant.m-2.

Treatment
mixture of herbicides (U 46 1 L.ha-1) + (Axial 1.5 L.ha-1)e0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
number of weedse0
Direction
reducede0
Value
0.00 plant.m-2e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the mixture of herbicides (U 46 1 L.ha-1) + (Axial 1.5 L.ha-1) (H1 ) by giving the best weed control, where this treatment reduced the number of weeds in the experiment to give 0.00 plant.m-2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 293–484 · show in text ↑
t0

“barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 16–22 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The herbicide mixture achieved 100% weed control.

Treatment
mixture of herbicides (U 46 1 L.ha-1) + (Axial 1.5 L.ha-1)e1
Interactor
weedt0weed
Outcome
control percentagese0
Direction
beste0
Value
100%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“It also gave the best control percentages by 100%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 486–535 · show in text ↑
e1

“mixture of herbicides (U 46 1 L.ha-1) + (Axial 1.5 L.ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 297–355 · show in text ↑
t0

“barley varieties and its companion weed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 16–55 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The herbicide mixture produced a grain yield of 1.57 ton.ha-1, close to hand weeding.

Treatment
mixture of herbicides (U 46 1 L.ha-1) + (Axial 1.5 L.ha-1)e1
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
beste0
Value
1.57 ton.ha-1e0
Comparator
treatment of hand weedinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“giving the best grain yield of 1.57 ton.ha-1, whose results were close to the treatment of hand weeding”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 558–661 · show in text ↑
e1

“mixture of herbicides (U 46 1 L.ha-1) + (Axial 1.5 L.ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 297–355 · show in text ↑
t0

“barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 16–22 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Iba 265 had the highest grain yield, 1.82 ton.ha-1, versus 0.98 ton.ha-1 in the control.

Material
Iba 265e0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
1.82 ton.ha-1e0
Qualifier
0.98 ton.ha-1e0
Comparator
control treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the variety Iba 265 achieved the best results compared to the other varieties used in the study, as it gave the highest grain yield of 1.82 ton.ha-1 compared to the control treatment which gave the lowest grain yield amounted to 0.98 ton.ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 672–914 · show in text ↑
t0

“barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 16–22 · show in text ↑

herbicide · yield · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Results differ

61 papers: 42 positive, 19 negative or no effect

41 papers in the same direction as this paper · 19 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

57 papers more in this group

See all 61 papers →

herbicide · control · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

herbicide · weed · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

34 papers: 26 positive, 8 negative or no effect

25 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

30 papers more in this group

See all 34 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.