Paper · 2015 · Canadian Journal of Plant Science

The impact of fungicide and herbicide timing on foliar disease severity, and barley productivity and quality

T. K. Turkington; J. T. O'Donovan; K. N. Harker; et al.

10
claims
21
verbatim quotes
24
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Turkington, T. K., O'Donovan, J. T., Harker, K. N., Xi, K., Blackshaw, R. E., Johnson, E. N., Peng, G., Kutcher, H. R., May, W. E., Lafond, G. P., Mohr, R. M., Irvine, R. B. and Stevenson, C. 2015. The impact of fungicide and herbicide timing on foliar disease severity, and barley productivity and quality. Can. J. Plant Sci. 95: 525–537. There is interest in mixing herbicides with a half-rate of fungicide at herbicide timings for barley in western Canada. At six sites across the Canadian prairies from 2010 to 2012 combinations of herbicide and the fungicide Tilt ® (propiconazole) were applied to barley at the two- to three-leaf stage (herbicide and half-rate fungicide), five- to six-leaf stage (herbicide and half-rate fungicide), and/or the flag leaf stage (full or half-rate fungicide only). Each plot area was cross-seeded with tame oat as a model weed prior to seeding. Upper canopy leaf samples were collected for leaf disease assessment at the early dough growth stage. Weed biomass, and grain yield and quality were determined. Total leaf area diseased (a combination of scald, both forms of net blotch and spot blotch) was greater for the two- to three- or five- to six-leaf stage herbicide-only treatments and the combination herbicide and half-rate fungicide treatments compared with fungicide at the flag leaf stage. Yield, 1000-kernel weight, kernel plumpness and test weight were greatest and kernel thins lowest for treatments with a flag leaf stage fungicide application. Split applications of fungicide at the time of herbicide application and at flag leaf emergence did not improve disease management and crop productivity compared with a single full rate fungicide application at the flag leaf stage. Weed biomass was generally not influenced by the treatments because weed control was excellent at all sites. However, yield was lower when herbicide was applied at the five- to six-leaf versus the two- to three-leaf stage. For improved leaf disease management and yield in barley, fungicide applications should include a flag leaf stage timing for adequate protection of upper canopy leaves, which are key contributors to yield and grain filling. Delaying herbicide application to the five- to six-leaf stage in an attempt to accommodate a fungicide application reduces barley yield due to early-season weed interference.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Early herbicide-only and herbicide plus half-rate fungicide treatments had more diseased barley leaf area than flag-leaf fungicide.

Treatment
two- to three- or five- to six-leaf stage herbicide-only treatments and the combination herbicide and half-rate fungicide treatmentse0
Outcome
Total leaf area diseasede0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
fungicide at the flag leaf stagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–83 · show in text ↑
e0

“Total leaf area diseased (a combination of scald, both forms of net blotch and spot blotch) was greater for the two- to three- or five- to six-leaf stage herbicide-only treatments and the combination herbicide and half-rate fungicide treatments compared with fungicide at the flag leaf stage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1044–1336 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flag-leaf fungicide treatments gave the greatest barley yield, thousand-kernel weight and kernel plumpness.

Treatment
flag leaf stage fungicide applicatione0
Outcome
Yield, 1000-kernel weight, kernel plumpnesse0
Direction
greateste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–83 · show in text ↑
e0

“Yield, 1000-kernel weight, kernel plumpness and test weight were greatest and kernel thins lowest for treatments with a flag leaf stage fungicide application.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1337–1495 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flag-leaf fungicide treatments gave the greatest barley test weight.

Treatment
flag leaf stage fungicide applicatione0
Outcome
test weighte0
Direction
greateste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–83 · show in text ↑
e0

“Yield, 1000-kernel weight, kernel plumpness and test weight were greatest and kernel thins lowest for treatments with a flag leaf stage fungicide application.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1337–1495 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flag-leaf fungicide treatments gave the lowest barley kernel thins.

Treatment
flag leaf stage fungicide applicatione0
Outcome
kernel thinse0
Direction
loweste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–83 · show in text ↑
e0

“kernel thins lowest for treatments with a flag leaf stage fungicide application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1415–1494 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Split fungicide applications did not improve barley disease management relative to one full-rate flag-leaf application.

Treatment
Split applications of fungicide at the time of herbicide application and at flag leaf emergencee0
Outcome
disease managemente0
Direction
did not improvee0
Comparator
a single full rate fungicide application at the flag leaf stagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–83 · show in text ↑
e0

“Split applications of fungicide at the time of herbicide application and at flag leaf emergence did not improve disease management and crop productivity compared with a single full rate fungicide application at the flag leaf stage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1496–1727 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Split fungicide applications did not improve barley crop productivity relative to one full-rate flag-leaf application.

Treatment
Split applications of fungicide at the time of herbicide application and at flag leaf emergencee0
Outcome
crop productivitye0
Direction
did not improvee0
Comparator
a single full rate fungicide application at the flag leaf stagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–83 · show in text ↑
e0

“Split applications of fungicide at the time of herbicide application and at flag leaf emergence did not improve disease management and crop productivity compared with a single full rate fungicide application at the flag leaf stage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1496–1727 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatments generally did not influence tame-oat weed biomass.

Treatment
the treatmentse0
Interactor
tame oate1weed
Outcome
Weed biomasse0
Direction
not influencede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–83 · show in text ↑
e0

“Weed biomass was generally not influenced by the treatments because weed control was excellent at all sites.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1728–1836 · show in text ↑
e1

“Each plot area was cross-seeded with tame oat as a model weed prior to seeding.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 803–882 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Barley yield was lower with herbicide at the five- to six-leaf stage than at the two- to three-leaf stage.

Treatment
herbicide was applied at the five- to six-leafe0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
two- to three-leaf stagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–83 · show in text ↑
e0

“yield was lower when herbicide was applied at the five- to six-leaf versus the two- to three-leaf stage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1846–1950 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend including flag-leaf fungicide timing for barley disease control and yield.

Outcome
fungicide applications should include a flag leaf stage timinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–83 · show in text ↑
e0

“For improved leaf disease management and yield in barley, fungicide applications should include a flag leaf stage timing for adequate protection of upper canopy leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1951–2118 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude delaying barley herbicide application to five or six leaves reduces yield because of early weed interference.

Treatment
Delaying herbicide application to the five- to six-leaf stagee0
Outcome
barley yielde0
Direction
reducese0
Qualifier
early-season weed interferencee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–83 · show in text ↑
e0

“Delaying herbicide application to the five- to six-leaf stage in an attempt to accommodate a fungicide application reduces barley yield due to early-season weed interference.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2175–2349 · show in text ↑

herbicide · growth · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

fungicide · yield · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Results differ

61 papers: 54 positive, 7 negative or no effect

53 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

57 papers more in this group

See all 61 papers →

herbicide · yield · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Results differ

61 papers: 42 positive, 19 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 42 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

57 papers more in this group

See all 61 papers →

herbicide · control · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

fungicide · control · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 5 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

fungicide · growth · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 12 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

herbicide · growth · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

22 papers: 8 positive, 14 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

fungicide · quality: grain · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.