Abstract
The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of long-term reduced tillage on yield and weeds of spring barley. Treatments consisted of three tillage systems including: (a) conventional tillage (CT), (b) reduced tillage (RT), and (c) herbicide tillage (HT) as the main plot, and two cultivars of spring barley (Tocada and Rastik) as subplots. The results showed that the yield of both cultivars was the highest in CT and the lowest in HT and RT tillage systems. Yield reductions in both HT and RT tillage systems were due to lower spikes per m 2 and 1,000 grain weight. Weeds numbers and dry weight were more in HT and RT than CT tillage.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 4
Claim · model-written summary
Both barley cultivars had highest yield under conventional tillage and lowest yield under herbicide and reduced tillage.
- Taxon
- Spring Barley
.jpg?width=60)
Hordeum vulgaret0 - Treatment
- CTe0
- Outcome
- yield of both cultivarse0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Comparator
- HT and RT tillage systemse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“The results showed that the yield of both cultivars was the highest in CT and the lowest in HT and RT tillage systems”
t0“Spring Barley”
Claim · model-written summary
Herbicide and reduced tillage had fewer spikes per square metre than conventional tillage.
- Taxon
- Spring BarleyHordeum vulgaret0
- Treatment
- HT and RT tillage systemse0
- Outcome
- spikes per m 2e0
- Direction
- lowere0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Yield reductions in both HT and RT tillage systems were due to lower spikes per m 2 and 1,000 grain weight”
t0“Spring Barley”
Claim · model-written summary
Herbicide and reduced tillage had lower thousand-grain weight.
- Taxon
- Spring BarleyHordeum vulgaret0
- Treatment
- HT and RT tillage systemse0
- Outcome
- 1,000 grain weighte0
- Direction
- lowere0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Yield reductions in both HT and RT tillage systems were due to lower spikes per m 2 and 1,000 grain weight”
t0“Spring Barley”
Claim · model-written summary
Weed numbers and dry weight were greater under herbicide and reduced tillage than conventional tillage.
- Taxon
- Spring BarleyHordeum vulgaret0
- Treatment
- HT and RTe0
- Interactor
- Weedse0weed
- Outcome
- Weeds numbers and dry weighte0
- Direction
- moree0
- Comparator
- CTe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Weeds numbers and dry weight were more in HT and RT than CT tillage”
t0“Spring Barley”
The same questions in other papers
herbicide · yield · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Results differ
18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 42 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
57 papers more in this group
See all 61 papers →tillage · weed · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results
6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
20 papers more in this group
See all 24 papers →herbicide · weed · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results
7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 26 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
30 papers more in this group
See all 34 papers →tillage · yield · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results
104 papers in the same direction as this paper · 43 in the opposite direction · 13 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- positive
- positive
157 papers more in this group
See all 161 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.