Abstract
Two field experiments were carried out in two seasons (2020 and 2021) at Itay El-Baroud Agricultural Research Station, El-Beheira Governorate, Egypt to evaluate three Egyptian rice cultivars (Giza177, Sakha101 and Sakha108) under three planting methods (drilling seeded, regular transplanting and parachute transplanting). Days to heading, plant height, number of productive tillers m-2, panicle length, panicle weight, number of filled grains panicle-1, number of unfilled grains panicle-1 and 1000-grain weight, grain yield, biomass yield, harvest index and production efficiency were measured. There were no significant differences between regular and parachute transplanting methods on plant height, number of productive tillers m2 and panicle length whereas the drill planting method recorded the lowest values in both seasons except days to heading showed no significant difference with parachute transplanting. The interaction between planting methods and rice cultivars had a significant effect on the number of days to heading, number of productive tillers m-2 and plant height. There were no significant differences between parachuting and regular transplanting methods in panicle weight, number of filled grains panicle-1 and 1000-grain weight where the parachute transplanting method recorded the highest values followed by regular transplanting in the first season. On contrary, the highest values were given by regular transplanting followed by parachuting in the second season. Also, there were no significant differences between regular and parachute transplanting in 1000-grain weight, grain yield, biomass yield and harvest index. These results revealed that regular and parachute transplanting methods are efficient and farmers can choose between them based on their capabilities.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 10
Claim · model-written summary
Regular and parachute transplanting did not differ significantly in plant height, number of productive tillers per m2 and panicle length of rice.
- Taxon
- Oryza sativa L.
Oryza sativat0 - Treatment
- regulare0
- Outcome
- plant height, number of productive tillers m2 and panicle lengthe0
- Direction
- no significant differencese0
- Comparator
- parachute transplantinge0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Rice (Oryza sativa L.)”
e0“There were no significant differences between regular and parachute transplanting methods on plant height, number of productive tillers m2 and panicle length”
Claim · model-written summary
Drill planting recorded the lowest plant height, number of productive tillers per m2 and panicle length in both seasons.
- Taxon
- Oryza sativa L.Oryza sativat0
- Treatment
- drill planting methode0
- Outcome
- plant height, number of productive tillers m2 and panicle lengthe0
- Direction
- loweste0
- Qualifier
- in both seasonse0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Rice (Oryza sativa L.)”
e0“no significant differences between regular and parachute transplanting methods on plant height, number of productive tillers m2 and panicle length whereas the drill planting method recorded the lowest values in both seasons”
Claim · model-written summary
Days to heading under drill planting did not differ significantly from parachute transplanting.
- Taxon
- Oryza sativa L.Oryza sativat0
- Treatment
- drill planting methode0
- Outcome
- days to headinge0
- Direction
- no significant differencee0
- Comparator
- parachute transplantinge0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Rice (Oryza sativa L.)”
e0“the drill planting method recorded the lowest values in both seasons except days to heading showed no significant difference with parachute transplanting”
Claim · model-written summary
The interaction between planting methods and rice cultivars had a significant effect on days to heading, productive tillers per m2 and plant height.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativae0
- Treatment
- interaction between planting methods and rice cultivarse0
- Outcome
- number of days to heading, number of productive tillers m-2 and plant heighte0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The interaction between planting methods and rice cultivars had a significant effect on the number of days to heading, number of productive tillers m-2 and plant height”
Claim · model-written summary
Parachute and regular transplanting did not differ significantly in panicle weight, filled grains per panicle and 1000-grain weight.
- Taxon
- Oryza sativa L.Oryza sativat0
- Treatment
- parachutinge0
- Outcome
- panicle weight, number of filled grains panicle-1 and 1000-grain weighte0
- Direction
- no significant differencese0
- Comparator
- regular transplanting methodse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Rice (Oryza sativa L.)”
e0“There were no significant differences between parachuting and regular transplanting methods in panicle weight, number of filled grains panicle-1 and 1000-grain weight”
Claim · model-written summary
In the first season parachute transplanting recorded the highest values, followed by regular transplanting.
- Taxon
- Oryza sativa L.Oryza sativat0
- Treatment
- parachute transplanting methode0
- Outcome
- valuese0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Qualifier
- first seasone0
- Comparator
- regular transplantinge0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Rice (Oryza sativa L.)”
e0“the parachute transplanting method recorded the highest values followed by regular transplanting in the first season”
Claim · model-written summary
In the second season regular transplanting gave the highest values, followed by parachuting.
- Taxon
- Oryza sativa L.Oryza sativat0
- Treatment
- regular transplantinge0
- Outcome
- valuese0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Qualifier
- second seasone0
- Comparator
- parachutinge0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Rice (Oryza sativa L.)”
e0“the highest values were given by regular transplanting followed by parachuting in the second season”
Claim · model-written summary
Regular and parachute transplanting did not differ significantly in 1000-grain weight, grain yield and biomass yield.
- Taxon
- Oryza sativa L.Oryza sativat0
- Treatment
- regulare0
- Outcome
- 1000-grain weight, grain yield, biomass yielde0
- Direction
- no significant differencese0
- Comparator
- parachute transplantinge0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Rice (Oryza sativa L.)”
e0“no significant differences between regular and parachute transplanting in 1000-grain weight, grain yield, biomass yield and harvest index”
Claim · model-written summary
Regular and parachute transplanting did not differ significantly in harvest index.
- Taxon
- Oryza sativa L.Oryza sativat0
- Treatment
- regulare0
- Outcome
- harvest indexe0
- Direction
- no significant differencese0
- Comparator
- parachute transplantinge0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Rice (Oryza sativa L.)”
e0“no significant differences between regular and parachute transplanting in 1000-grain weight, grain yield, biomass yield and harvest index”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors conclude that regular and parachute transplanting are efficient and farmers can choose between them according to their capabilities.
- Taxon
- Oryza sativa L.Oryza sativat0
- Outcome
- regular and parachute transplanting methods are efficient and farmers can choose between theme0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Rice (Oryza sativa L.)”
e0“regular and parachute transplanting methods are efficient and farmers can choose between them based on their capabilities”
The same questions in other papers
transplanting · phenology · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results
9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- positive
23 papers more in this group
See all 27 papers →transplanting · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results
155 papers in the same direction as this paper · 922 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
1,074 papers more in this group
See all 1,078 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.