Paper · 2015 · The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences

Effect of crop establishment methods on productivity, profitability and energetics of rice (Oryza sativa)-wheat (Triticum aestivum) system

J S BOHRA; RAKESH KUMAR

12
claims
16
verbatim quotes
42
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

A field experiment was carried out from 2007-08 to 2009-10 at Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh to compare the performance of four crop establishment methods (direct dry seeding by zero till drill, direct seeding of sprouted rice seeds in puddled field by drum seeder, hand transplanting and mechanical transplanting through SPT in rice and four tillage methods (rotavator, conventional sowing, strip and zero till drilling) in wheat on productivity, profitability and energetics of rice (Oryza sativa L.)-wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cropping system. Results revealed that hand and mechanical transplanting by SPT of rice (PHB 71) being at par, produced significantly higher grain yield of rice (5.76 and 5.71 tonnes/ha) than direct dry seeding by zero till and direct seeding of sprouted rice by drum seeder under puddled field (3.86 and 4.98 tonnes/ha). However, the use of SPT gave the maximum B:C ratio (2.86) and was significantly superior over hand transplanting (2.58), direct seeding of sprouted rice by drum seeder (2.51) and direct dry seeding by zero till (1.86). In wheat (HD 2733), zero till drill sowing proved most cost effective and recorded markedly higher grain yield (4.05 tonnes/ha), net return (Rupees 44 670/ha ) and B:C ratio (4.19) but statistically at par with conventional sowing than rotavator and strip till. Consequently, among the rice establishment methods hand transplanting produced the maximum system REY (10.2 tonnes/ha/yr) being at par with mechanical transplanting (10.18 tonnes/ha/yr) and both produced significantly higher REY than drum seeder and zero till drill (9.56 and 8.52 tonnes/ha/yr, respectively). In wheat, zero till drill sowing produced the maximum REY (9.92 tonnes/ha/yr) and being comparable to conventional sowing, rotavator and strip till (9.72, 9.52 and 9.30 tonnes/ha/yr, respectively). The similar trend was followed in system productivity of rice and wheat. Moreover, mechanical transplanted rice by SPT (5.62) followed by zero till drill (6.46) sown in wheat gave the highest energy efficiency than other crop establishments methods by ensuring timely and cheap sowing without sacrificing crop yield.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Hand transplanting produced 5.76 tonnes/ha rice grain yield, significantly above direct seeding methods and at par with mechanical transplanting.

Material
PHB 71e0
Treatment
hande0
Outcome
grain yield of ricee0
Direction
highere0
Value
5.76 and 5.71 tonnes/hae0
Comparator
direct dry seeding by zero till and direct seeding of sprouted rice by drum seedere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Results revealed that hand and mechanical transplanting by SPT of rice (PHB 71) being at par, produced significantly higher grain yield of rice (5.76 and 5.71 tonnes/ha) than direct dry seeding by zero till and direct seeding of sprouted rice by drum seeder under puddled field (3.86 and 4.98 tonnes/ha).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 542–846 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice (Oryza sativa)-wheat (Triticum aestivum) system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–138 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Mechanical transplanting by SPT produced 5.71 tonnes/ha rice grain yield, significantly above direct seeding methods.

Material
PHB 71e0
Treatment
mechanical transplanting by SPTe0
Outcome
grain yield of ricee0
Direction
highere0
Value
5.71 tonnes/hae0
Comparator
direct dry seeding by zero till and direct seeding of sprouted rice by drum seedere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Results revealed that hand and mechanical transplanting by SPT of rice (PHB 71) being at par, produced significantly higher grain yield of rice (5.76 and 5.71 tonnes/ha) than direct dry seeding by zero till and direct seeding of sprouted rice by drum seeder under puddled field (3.86 and 4.98 tonnes/ha).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 542–846 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

SPT had the maximum B:C ratio of 2.86 and exceeded the other rice establishment methods.

Treatment
SPTe0
Outcome
B:C ratioe0
Direction
maximume0
Value
2.86e0
Comparator
hand transplantinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“However, the use of SPT gave the maximum B:C ratio (2.86) and was significantly superior over hand transplanting (2.58), direct seeding of sprouted rice by drum seeder (2.51) and direct dry seeding by zero till (1.86).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 847–1065 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice (Oryza sativa)-wheat (Triticum aestivum) system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–138 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zero till drill wheat sowing had higher grain yield of 4.05 tonnes/ha than rotavator and strip till.

Material
HD 2733e0
Treatment
zero till drill sowinge0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
4.05 tonnes/hae0
Comparator
rotavator and strip tille0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In wheat (HD 2733), zero till drill sowing proved most cost effective and recorded markedly higher grain yield (4.05 tonnes/ha), net return (Rupees 44 670/ha ) and B:C ratio (4.19) but statistically at par with conventional sowing than rotavator and strip till.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1066–1327 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zero till drill wheat sowing had higher net return of Rupees 44 670/ha than rotavator and strip till.

Treatment
zero till drill sowinge0
Outcome
net returne0
Direction
highere0
Value
Rupees 44 670/hae0
Comparator
rotavator and strip tille0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In wheat (HD 2733), zero till drill sowing proved most cost effective and recorded markedly higher grain yield (4.05 tonnes/ha), net return (Rupees 44 670/ha ) and B:C ratio (4.19) but statistically at par with conventional sowing than rotavator and strip till.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1066–1327 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zero till drill wheat sowing had a higher B:C ratio of 4.19 than rotavator and strip till.

Treatment
zero till drill sowinge0
Outcome
B:C ratioe0
Direction
highere0
Value
4.19e0
Comparator
rotavator and strip tille0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In wheat (HD 2733), zero till drill sowing proved most cost effective and recorded markedly higher grain yield (4.05 tonnes/ha), net return (Rupees 44 670/ha ) and B:C ratio (4.19) but statistically at par with conventional sowing than rotavator and strip till.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1066–1327 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Hand transplanting gave maximum system REY of 10.2 tonnes/ha/yr, at par with mechanical transplanting and higher than drum seeder and zero till drill.

Treatment
hand transplantinge0
Outcome
system REYe0
Direction
maximume0
Value
10.2 tonnes/ha/yre0
Comparator
drum seeder and zero till drille0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Consequently, among the rice establishment methods hand transplanting produced the maximum system REY (10.2 tonnes/ha/yr) being at par with mechanical transplanting (10.18 tonnes/ha/yr) and both produced significantly higher REY than drum seeder and zero till drill (9.56 and 8.52 tonnes/ha/yr, respectively).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1328–1637 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Mechanical transplanting gave 10.18 tonnes/ha/yr system REY, higher than drum seeder and zero till drill.

Treatment
mechanical transplantinge0
Outcome
system REYe0
Direction
highere0
Value
10.18 tonnes/ha/yre0
Comparator
drum seeder and zero till drille0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Consequently, among the rice establishment methods hand transplanting produced the maximum system REY (10.2 tonnes/ha/yr) being at par with mechanical transplanting (10.18 tonnes/ha/yr) and both produced significantly higher REY than drum seeder and zero till drill (9.56 and 8.52 tonnes/ha/yr, respectively).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1328–1637 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zero till drill wheat sowing produced maximum REY of 9.92 tonnes/ha/yr, comparable with conventional, rotavator and strip till sowing.

Treatment
zero till drill sowinge0
Outcome
REYe0
Direction
maximume0
Value
9.92 tonnes/ha/yre0
Comparator
conventional sowing, rotavator and strip tille0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In wheat, zero till drill sowing produced the maximum REY (9.92 tonnes/ha/yr) and being comparable to conventional sowing, rotavator and strip till (9.72, 9.52 and 9.30 tonnes/ha/yr, respectively).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1638–1835 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

System productivity followed the same method trend as REY.

Outcome
system productivity of rice and wheate0
Direction
similar trende0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The similar trend was followed in system productivity of rice and wheat.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1836–1908 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice (Oryza sativa)-wheat (Triticum aestivum) system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–138 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mechanical rice transplanting by SPT yielded the highest energy efficiency among rice methods.

Treatment
mechanical transplanted rice by SPTe0
Outcome
energy efficiencye0
Direction
higheste0
Value
5.62e0
Comparator
other crop establishments methodse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Moreover, mechanical transplanted rice by SPT (5.62) followed by zero till drill (6.46) sown in wheat gave the highest energy efficiency than other crop establishments methods by ensuring timely and cheap sowing without sacrificing crop yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1909–2152 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zero till drill sowing yielded the highest energy efficiency among wheat methods.

Treatment
zero till drille0
Outcome
energy efficiencye0
Direction
higheste0
Value
6.46e0
Comparator
other crop establishments methodse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Moreover, mechanical transplanted rice by SPT (5.62) followed by zero till drill (6.46) sown in wheat gave the highest energy efficiency than other crop establishments methods by ensuring timely and cheap sowing without sacrificing crop yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1909–2152 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum) system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–138 · show in text ↑

transplanting · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

176 papers: 129 positive, 47 negative or no effect

128 papers in the same direction as this paper · 35 in the opposite direction · 12 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

172 papers more in this group

See all 176 papers →

transplanting · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

1,078 papers: 922 positive, 156 negative or no effect

921 papers in the same direction as this paper · 132 in the opposite direction · 24 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

1,074 papers more in this group

See all 1,078 papers →

tillage · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

1,414 papers: 1,116 positive, 298 negative or no effect

1,115 papers in the same direction as this paper · 257 in the opposite direction · 41 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1,410 papers more in this group

See all 1,414 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.