Paper · 1971 · Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science

Floral Initiation, Development, and Associated Phenomena of Dianthus caryophyllus L. Part I - Effect of Photoperiod1

L. H. Cheng; R. W. Langhans

9
claims
17
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Abstract Dianthus caryophyllus L., a quantitative long day plant, was used for studies of the effect of photoperiod on the different stages of plant development. The anatomical structure of the vegetative shoot apex and the changes during floral transformation are described. These stages were not affected by the various photoperiod lengths, i.e., 9, 13, and 18 hr. The developmental cycle of D. caryophyllus may be divided into 3 stages: vegetative, floral initiation, and floral development. The influence of photoperiod on the duration of each of the 3 stages was different. The length of the vegetative stage was inversely related to the length of the photoperiod (the longer the photoperiod, the shorter the vegetative stage). Daylength had no effect on the period of floral initiation, but did affect the period of floral development (i.e., the longer the photoperiod, the longer the developmental stage). The rate of stem elongation under all treatments increased exponentially until the floral initiation state, and then the plants grown under photoperiods of 13 hr or longer elongated significantly faster than those under the 9-hr photoperiod. After flower initiation was completed, the rate of stem elongation suddenly increased linearly until the flower opened. In contrast to the vegetative shoot, the rate of stem elongation of flowering plants was completely independent of photoperiod, and the rate was the same in the 9, 13, and 18 hr photoperiods.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vegetative apex and floral transformation stages were unaffected by 9, 13 and 18 hr photoperiods.

Taxon
Dianthus caryophyllus L.Dianthus caryophyllust0
Treatment
various photoperiod lengths, i.e., 9, 13, and 18 hre0
Outcome
These stagese0
Direction
not affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Dianthus caryophyllus
Dianthus caryophyllus · TaxonDarkone ( talk · contribs ) · CC BY-SA 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The anatomical structure of the vegetative shoot apex and the changes during floral transformation are described. These stages were not affected by the various photoperiod lengths, i.e., 9, 13, and 18 hr.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 162–366 · show in text ↑
t0

“Dianthus caryophyllus L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–84 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The developmental cycle has vegetative, floral initiation and floral development stages.

Taxon
D. caryophyllusDianthus caryophylluse0
Outcome
3 stages: vegetative, floral initiation, and floral developmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Dianthus caryophyllus
Dianthus caryophyllus · TaxonDarkone ( talk · contribs ) · CC BY-SA 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The developmental cycle of D. caryophyllus may be divided into 3 stages: vegetative, floral initiation, and floral development.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 367–494 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Longer photoperiod shortened the vegetative stage.

Taxon
Dianthus caryophyllus L.Dianthus caryophyllust0
Treatment
photoperiode0
Outcome
length of the vegetative stagee0
Direction
shortere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Dianthus caryophyllus
Dianthus caryophyllus · TaxonDarkone ( talk · contribs ) · CC BY-SA 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The length of the vegetative stage was inversely related to the length of the photoperiod (the longer the photoperiod, the shorter the vegetative stage).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 579–732 · show in text ↑
t0

“Dianthus caryophyllus L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–84 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Daylength had no effect on floral initiation duration.

Taxon
Dianthus caryophyllus L.Dianthus caryophyllust0
Treatment
Daylengthe0
Outcome
period of floral initiatione0
Direction
no effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Dianthus caryophyllus
Dianthus caryophyllus · TaxonDarkone ( talk · contribs ) · CC BY-SA 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Daylength had no effect on the period of floral initiation, but did affect the period of floral development (i.e., the longer the photoperiod, the longer the developmental stage).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 733–912 · show in text ↑
t0

“Dianthus caryophyllus L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–84 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Longer photoperiod lengthened floral development.

Taxon
Dianthus caryophyllus L.Dianthus caryophyllust0
Treatment
photoperiode0
Outcome
period of floral developmente0
Direction
longere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Dianthus caryophyllus
Dianthus caryophyllus · TaxonDarkone ( talk · contribs ) · CC BY-SA 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Daylength had no effect on the period of floral initiation, but did affect the period of floral development (i.e., the longer the photoperiod, the longer the developmental stage).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 733–912 · show in text ↑
t0

“Dianthus caryophyllus L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–84 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stem elongation rate increased exponentially until floral initiation under all treatments.

Taxon
Dianthus caryophyllus L.Dianthus caryophyllust0
Organ / stage
floral initiation statee0
Outcome
rate of stem elongatione0
Direction
increased exponentiallye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Dianthus caryophyllus
Dianthus caryophyllus · TaxonDarkone ( talk · contribs ) · CC BY-SA 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The rate of stem elongation under all treatments increased exponentially until the floral initiation state, and then the plants grown under photoperiods of 13 hr or longer elongated significantly faster than those under the 9-hr photoperiod.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 913–1154 · show in text ↑
t0

“Dianthus caryophyllus L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–84 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At floral initiation, plants under 13 hr or longer photoperiods elongated significantly faster than under 9 hr.

Taxon
Dianthus caryophyllus L.Dianthus caryophyllust0
Treatment
photoperiods of 13 hr or longere0
Outcome
elongatede0
Direction
fastere0
Comparator
9-hr photoperiode0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Dianthus caryophyllus
Dianthus caryophyllus · TaxonDarkone ( talk · contribs ) · CC BY-SA 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The rate of stem elongation under all treatments increased exponentially until the floral initiation state, and then the plants grown under photoperiods of 13 hr or longer elongated significantly faster than those under the 9-hr photoperiod.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 913–1154 · show in text ↑
t0

“Dianthus caryophyllus L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–84 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After flower initiation, stem elongation rate increased linearly until flower opening.

Taxon
Dianthus caryophyllus L.Dianthus caryophyllust0
Organ / stage
flower initiatione0
Outcome
rate of stem elongatione0
Direction
increased linearlye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Dianthus caryophyllus
Dianthus caryophyllus · TaxonDarkone ( talk · contribs ) · CC BY-SA 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“After flower initiation was completed, the rate of stem elongation suddenly increased linearly until the flower opened.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1155–1274 · show in text ↑
t0

“Dianthus caryophyllus L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–84 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flowering-plant stem elongation rate was the same at 9, 13 and 18 hr photoperiods.

Taxon
Dianthus caryophyllus L.Dianthus caryophyllust0
Treatment
9, 13, and 18 hr photoperiodse0
Outcome
rate of stem elongation of flowering plantse0
Direction
the samee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Dianthus caryophyllus
Dianthus caryophyllus · TaxonDarkone ( talk · contribs ) · CC BY-SA 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In contrast to the vegetative shoot, the rate of stem elongation of flowering plants was completely independent of photoperiod, and the rate was the same in the 9, 13, and 18 hr photoperiods.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1275–1466 · show in text ↑
t0

“Dianthus caryophyllus L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–84 · show in text ↑

light · growth · Dianthus caryophyllus (carnation)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 9 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.