Paper · 2005 · Journal of Plant Production

EFFECT OF ORGANIC AND BIOFERTILIZERS ON GROWTH, YIELD AND FRUIT QUALITY OF CUCUMBER (Cucumis sativus, L.) GROWN UNDER CLEAR POLYETHYLENE LOW TUNNELS

Monna Hana; Saeed Kabeel; Fayza Darwesh

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
2
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

This study was conducted in two winter seasons of 2002-2003 and 2003-2004 on cucumber hybrid "PRINCE" at EL-Borolos area under clear polyethylene low tunnel conditions to evaluate the effect of some organic manures (Chicken manure and compost) and biofertilizers (dual inoculation of Azotobacter and Azospirillum) compared with chemical fertilizers on growth, early and total yield, fruit characteristic and chemical composition (NPK), cholorophyll and the rhizospheric microbial symptoms. (Nitrogenase activity, count of associative diazotrophs, Azotobacter spp and Azospirillum spp, CO2 evaluation, soil dehydrogenase activity and Bacterial population. Results indicated that application of chicken manure with biofertilizer at the rates of 10 m3 and 20 m3/ feddan significantly increased vegetative growth (plant height, number of branches, number of leaves and leaf area), early and total yield and fruit quality. Furthermore, rhizosphere microbial symptoms (nitrogenase activity, number of associative diazotrophs, Azotobacter, Azospirillum spp., CO2 evolution, dehydrogenase activity and bacterial population) were also increased compared with those resulted in chemical fertilizer application. As for the chemical contents of cucumber leaves and fruits (N, P and K and total chlorophyll), results showed that N, P and K were similar in all treatments. Chlorophyll content did not differ significantly from control.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Chicken manure with biofertilizer significantly increased cucumber vegetative growth.

Taxon
CUCUMBERCucumis sativust0
Treatment
chicken manure with biofertilizer at the rates of 10 m3 and 20 m3/ feddane0
Outcome
vegetative growth (plant height, number of branches, number of leaves and leaf area)e0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of chicken manure with biofertilizer at the rates of 10 m3 and 20 m3/ feddan significantly increased vegetative growth (plant height, number of branches, number of leaves and leaf area)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 678–875 · show in text ↑
t0

“CUCUMBER”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–83 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Chicken manure with biofertilizer significantly increased early and total yield and fruit quality.

Taxon
CUCUMBERCucumis sativust0
Treatment
chicken manure with biofertilizer at the rates of 10 m3 and 20 m3/ feddane0
Outcome
early and total yield and fruit qualitye0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of chicken manure with biofertilizer at the rates of 10 m3 and 20 m3/ feddan significantly increased vegetative growth (plant height, number of branches, number of leaves and leaf area), early and total yield and fruit quality.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 678–917 · show in text ↑
t0

“CUCUMBER”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–83 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizosphere microbial indices increased relative to chemical fertilizer.

Taxon
CUCUMBERCucumis sativust0
Treatment
chicken manure with biofertilizert1
Outcome
rhizosphere microbial symptomse0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
chemical fertilizer applicatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“rhizosphere microbial symptoms (nitrogenase activity, number of associative diazotrophs, Azotobacter, Azospirillum spp., CO2 evolution, dehydrogenase activity and bacterial population) were also increased compared with those resulted in chemical fertilizer application.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 931–1200 · show in text ↑
t0

“CUCUMBER”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–83 · show in text ↑
t1

“application of chicken manure with biofertilizer at the rates of 10 m3 and 20 m3/ feddan significantly increased vegetative growth (plant height, number of branches, number of leaves and leaf area)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 678–875 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf and fruit N, P and K were similar across treatments.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse0
Outcome
N, P and Ke0
Direction
similare0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“As for the chemical contents of cucumber leaves and fruits (N, P and K and total chlorophyll), results showed that N, P and K were similar in all treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1201–1358 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorophyll content did not differ significantly from control.

Taxon
CUCUMBERCucumis sativust0
Outcome
Chlorophyll contente0
Direction
did not differe0
Comparator
controle0

Not reportedTreatment

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Chlorophyll content did not differ significantly from control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1359–1421 · show in text ↑
t0

“CUCUMBER”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–83 · show in text ↑

fertilization · quality: grain · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 12 positive, 1 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

fertilization · disease · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results

45 papers: 40 positive, 5 negative or no effect

39 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

41 papers more in this group

See all 45 papers →

inoculation · yield · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results

56 papers: 49 positive, 7 negative or no effect

48 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

52 papers more in this group

See all 56 papers →

inoculation · disease · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results

83 papers: 50 positive, 33 negative or no effect

49 papers in the same direction as this paper · 33 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

79 papers more in this group

See all 83 papers →

fertilization · yield · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results

288 papers: 263 positive, 25 negative or no effect

262 papers in the same direction as this paper · 19 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

284 papers more in this group

See all 288 papers →

inoculation · quality: grain · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.