Paper · 2022 · OENO One

Evaluation of site-specific management to optimise Vitis vinifera L. (cv. Tannat) production in a vineyard with high heterogeneity

Gustavo Pereyra; Anne Pellegrino; Remi Gaudin; et al.

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
16
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The spatial variability of vineyards can be characterised through precision viticulture that will allow setting the boundaries of homogeneous management zones. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of soil and plant management (site-specific management) to increase yields and improve berry quality. During three consecutive seasons, contrasting treatments designed ad hoc for two zones of vigour pre-established by NDVI were tested: high vigour zone (HV) and low vigour zone (LV). The treatments were aimed at reducing water and nitrogen supply and improving microclimatic conditions in the cluster zone in the HV zone. In the LV zone, treatments were aimed at increasing water and nitrogen supply. Leaf removal in the HV zone was the most efficient treatment to improve productivity and quality. Moreover, the water restriction improved grape quality, especially in a rainy year. The regulated deficit irrigation strategy applied in the LV zone at specific phenological stages was shown to increase vegetative growth, yield and to improve grape anthocyanins and phenols contents. The benefits of additional nitrogen supply in the LV zone on plant nitrogen status, yield, and berry composition were highly dependent on water availability. Ultimately, this study provided new insights into the relationship between water and nitrogen availability and how this determines vigour and influences yield and grape quality and influences the deviation from a “Productive Target” pattern. The use of site-specific techniques could be adjusted on a small production scale, thanks to mapping carried out with precision viticulture technologies.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf removal in the high-vigour zone was the most efficient treatment to improve Tannat productivity and quality.

Taxon
Vitis vinifera L.Vitis viniferat0
Material
cv. Tannatt0
Treatment
Leaf removale1
Outcome
productivity and qualitye1
Direction
improvee1
Setting
HV zonee1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“optimise Vitis vinifera L. (cv. Tannat) production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–92 · show in text ↑
e1

“Leaf removal in the HV zone was the most efficient treatment to improve productivity and quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 702–798 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water restriction improved Tannat grape quality, especially in a rainy year.

Taxon
Vitis vinifera L.Vitis viniferat0
Material
cv. Tannatt0
Treatment
water restrictione2
Outcome
grape qualitye2
Direction
improvede2
Qualifier
especially in a rainy yeare2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“optimise Vitis vinifera L. (cv. Tannat) production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–92 · show in text ↑
e2

“the water restriction improved grape quality, especially in a rainy year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 810–882 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Regulated deficit irrigation in the low-vigour zone increased Tannat vegetative growth and yield.

Taxon
Vitis vinifera L.Vitis viniferat0
Material
cv. Tannatt0
Treatment
regulated deficit irrigation strategye3
Outcome
vegetative growth, yielde3
Direction
increasee3
Setting
LV zonee3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“optimise Vitis vinifera L. (cv. Tannat) production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–92 · show in text ↑
e3

“The regulated deficit irrigation strategy applied in the LV zone at specific phenological stages was shown to increase vegetative growth, yield and to improve grape anthocyanins and phenols contents”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 884–1082 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Regulated deficit irrigation in the low-vigour zone improved Tannat anthocyanins and phenols contents.

Taxon
Vitis vinifera L.Vitis viniferat0
Material
cv. Tannatt0
Treatment
regulated deficit irrigation strategye3
Outcome
anthocyanins and phenols contentse3
Direction
improvee3
Setting
LV zonee3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“optimise Vitis vinifera L. (cv. Tannat) production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–92 · show in text ↑
e3

“The regulated deficit irrigation strategy applied in the LV zone at specific phenological stages was shown to increase vegetative growth, yield and to improve grape anthocyanins and phenols contents”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 884–1082 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The benefits of additional nitrogen supply in the low-vigour zone on nitrogen status, yield and berry composition depended strongly on water availability.

Taxon
Vitis vinifera L.Vitis viniferat0
Treatment
additional nitrogen supplye4
Outcome
plant nitrogen status, yield, and berry compositione4
Qualifier
highly dependent on water availabilitye4
Setting
LV zonee4

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“optimise Vitis vinifera L. (cv. Tannat) production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–92 · show in text ↑
e4

“The benefits of additional nitrogen supply in the LV zone on plant nitrogen status, yield, and berry composition were highly dependent on water availability”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1084–1240 · show in text ↑

pruning · quality: general · Vitis vinifera (wine grape)Results differ

30 papers: 19 positive, 11 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

26 papers more in this group

See all 30 papers →

irrigation · quality: phytochemicals · Vitis vinifera (wine grape)Positive and negative results

26 papers: 16 positive, 10 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

22 papers more in this group

See all 26 papers →

irrigation · yield · Vitis vinifera (wine grape)Positive and negative results

41 papers: 24 positive, 17 negative or no effect

23 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

37 papers more in this group

See all 41 papers →

drought · quality: general · Vitis vinifera (wine grape)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.