Paper · 2015 · Federal Research Centre for Cultivated Plants (Julius Kühn-Institut)

Responses of four winegrape varieties to managed water stress and partial defoliation in an arid environment

Ferlito, F.; Nicolosi, E.; Gentile, A.; et al.

4
claims
8
verbatim quotes
13
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

In viticulture, the imposition of managed water deficits is a strategy which has been used to increase both water use efficiency and winemaking quality in arid climates. Partial defoliation early in the season is another innovative practice that may also be used as an aid in regulating yield components and improving fruit quality. The aim of this work was to evaluate the effects of managed water stress and early season partial defoliation on crop yield and quality in two autochthonous (‘Frappato’ and ‘Nero d’Avola’) and two international varieties (‘Syrah’ and ‘Cabernet Sauvignon’) growing in an arid environment. The four treatments were: (i) no leaf removal, un-irrigated, (ii) no leaf removal, irrigated at 30 % of estimated crop evapotranspiration (ETc), (iii) partial leaf removal, un-irrigated, and (iv) partial leaf removal, irrigated at 30 % of estimated ETc. The results confirm the effectiveness of partial defoliation in yield management which leads to smaller clusters. Managed water stress was also an effective strategy for reducing berry size, improving must quality and generally enhancing anthocyanin accumulation.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Partial defoliation led to smaller winegrape clusters.

Taxon
winegrapeVitis viniferat0
Treatment
partial defoliatione0
Outcome
clusterse0
Direction
smallere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“winegrape varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 18–37 · show in text ↑
e0

“partial defoliation in yield management which leads to smaller clusters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 916–987 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Managed water stress reduced winegrape berry size.

Taxon
winegrapeVitis viniferat0
Treatment
Managed water stresse0
Outcome
berry sizee0
Direction
reducinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“winegrape varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 18–37 · show in text ↑
e0

“Managed water stress was also an effective strategy for reducing berry size, improving must quality and generally enhancing anthocyanin accumulation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 989–1138 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Managed water stress improved winegrape must quality.

Taxon
winegrapeVitis viniferat0
Treatment
Managed water stresse0
Outcome
must qualitye0
Direction
improvinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“winegrape varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 18–37 · show in text ↑
e0

“Managed water stress was also an effective strategy for reducing berry size, improving must quality and generally enhancing anthocyanin accumulation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 989–1138 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Managed water stress generally enhanced winegrape anthocyanin accumulation.

Taxon
winegrapeVitis viniferat0
Treatment
Managed water stresse0
Outcome
anthocyanin accumulatione0
Direction
enhancinge0
Qualifier
generallye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“winegrape varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 18–37 · show in text ↑
e0

“Managed water stress was also an effective strategy for reducing berry size, improving must quality and generally enhancing anthocyanin accumulation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 989–1138 · show in text ↑

drought · yield · Vitis vinifera (wine grape)Results differ

19 papers: 3 positive, 16 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

drought · quality: phytochemicals · Vitis vinifera (wine grape)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 14 positive, 3 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

drought · quality: general · Vitis vinifera (wine grape)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.