Paper · 2021 · Agriculture

Regulated Deficit Irrigation and Its Effects on Yield and Quality of Vitis vinifera L., Touriga Francesa in a Hot Climate Area (Douro Region, Portugal)

Inês L. Cabral; Anabela Carneiro; Tiago Nogueira; et al.

4
claims
9
verbatim quotes
8
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Under a climate change scenario, vineyards will experience serious challenges in the future. In an attempt to overcome such difficulties, this experiment offers a study on the effect of regulated deficit irrigation as a method for short-term adaptation to climate change in cv. Touriga Francesa, grafted into the rootstock 110R in the Douro region during a three-year period. Water stress on the plant and its effects on canopy, production, and quality of musts were analyzed. Rainfed vines (R0) were compared to three deficit irrigation regimes as a function of estimated crop evapotranspiration (ETc): R25 (25% ETc), R50 (50% ETc), and R75 (75% ETc). Water was applied on a weekly basis whenever predawn water potential showed moderate water stress until 15 days prior to harvest. The results suggest that rainfed plants under these circumstances suffered, in general, a negative impact on vine performance, while moderate water stress had more favorable effects on fruit composition, as well as in yield. Nonetheless, further studies should be conducted as irrigation did not show consistent effects on yield or berry composition.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rainfed vines suffered, in general, a negative impact on vine performance compared with deficit irrigation regimes.

Taxon
Vitis vinifera L.Vitis viniferat0
Treatment
rainfede2
Outcome
vine performancee1
Direction
negative impacte1
Comparator
three deficit irrigation regimese2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Yield and Quality of Vitis vinifera L., Touriga Francesa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–104 · show in text ↑
e1

“rainfed plants under these circumstances suffered, in general, a negative impact on vine performance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 808–908 · show in text ↑
e2

“Rainfed vines (R0) were compared to three deficit irrigation regimes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 477–545 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Moderate water stress had more favorable effects on fruit composition.

Taxon
Vitis vinifera L.Vitis viniferat0
Treatment
moderate water stresse3
Outcome
fruit compositione3
Direction
more favorablee3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Yield and Quality of Vitis vinifera L., Touriga Francesa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–104 · show in text ↑
e3

“while moderate water stress had more favorable effects on fruit composition, as well as in yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 910–1006 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Moderate water stress had more favorable effects on yield.

Taxon
Vitis vinifera L.Vitis viniferat0
Treatment
moderate water stresse3
Outcome
yielde3
Direction
more favorablee3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Yield and Quality of Vitis vinifera L., Touriga Francesa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–104 · show in text ↑
e3

“while moderate water stress had more favorable effects on fruit composition, as well as in yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 910–1006 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation did not show consistent effects on yield or berry composition.

Taxon
Vitis vinifera L.Vitis viniferat0
Treatment
irrigatione4
Outcome
yield or berry compositione4
Direction
did not show consistent effectse4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Yield and Quality of Vitis vinifera L., Touriga Francesa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–104 · show in text ↑
e4

“irrigation did not show consistent effects on yield or berry composition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1060–1132 · show in text ↑

drought · yield · Vitis vinifera (wine grape)Results differ

19 papers: 3 positive, 16 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

irrigation · quality: general · Vitis vinifera (wine grape)Positive and negative results

20 papers: 9 positive, 11 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. positive

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

drought · quality: general · Vitis vinifera (wine grape)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.