Paper · 2022 · Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture

Modification of wine phenolic profiles by gibberellic acid application in ‘Cabernet Gernischt’ grapevines before anthesis

Jianqiang Song; Ang Zhang; Fei Gao; et al.

8
claims
17
verbatim quotes
8
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract BACKGROUND Vitis vinifera L. ‘Cabernet Gernischt’ grapes from the Yantai wine region of China usually form dense clusters and contain low phenolic content. We applied five concentrations (ranged from 5 to 25 mg L −1 ) of gibberellic acid (GA 3 ) to ‘Cabernet Gernischt’ before anthesis to decrease cluster compactness in two consecutive vintages. Yield indices, grape maturity, and wine phenolic compounds were determined. RESULTS GA 3 application significantly reduced cluster compactness, bunch weight, and yield per vine, but it did not significantly improve fruit ripening. The levels of total phenolics, total tannins, and total anthocyanins in wine were enhanced by GA 3 application, with 10 and 15 mg L −1 GA 3 treatments consistently producing a significant increase in the concentrations of mavidin, cyanidin, and their derivatives. Specifically, trans ‐resveratrol was consistently significantly increased by 15 mg L −1 GA 3 application. Principal component analysis of phenolic compounds demonstrated the differences among wines produced from GA 3 treatment groups and the control. CONCLUSION Overall, wine phenolic profiles could be significantly modified by application of low concentrations of GA 3 before anthesis. Application of high levels of GA 3 is not recommended due to significant yield decrease. © 2022 Society of Chemical Industry.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

GA3 application significantly reduced cluster compactness in Cabernet Gernischt grapevines.

Taxon
Vitis viniferaVitis viniferae0
Treatment
GA 3 applicatione1
Outcome
cluster compactnesse1
Direction
reducede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Vitis vinifera L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 20–37 · show in text ↑
e1

“GA 3 application significantly reduced cluster compactness, bunch weight, and yield per vine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 440–532 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

GA3 application significantly reduced bunch weight and yield per vine in grapevines.

Taxon
Vitis viniferaVitis viniferae0
Treatment
GA 3 applicatione1
Outcome
bunch weight, and yield per vinee1
Direction
reducede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Vitis vinifera L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 20–37 · show in text ↑
e1

“GA 3 application significantly reduced cluster compactness, bunch weight, and yield per vine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 440–532 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

GA3 application did not significantly improve fruit ripening.

Taxon
Vitis viniferaVitis viniferae0
Treatment
GA 3 applicatione1
Outcome
fruit ripeninge2
Direction
did not significantly improvee2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Vitis vinifera L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 20–37 · show in text ↑
e1

“GA 3 application significantly reduced cluster compactness, bunch weight, and yield per vine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 440–532 · show in text ↑
e2

“it did not significantly improve fruit ripening”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 538–585 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GA3 application enhanced total phenolics, total tannins and total anthocyanins in wine.

Taxon
Vitis viniferaVitis viniferae0
Treatment
GA 3 applicatione3
Outcome
total phenolics, total tannins, and total anthocyanins in winee3
Direction
enhancede3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Vitis vinifera L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 20–37 · show in text ↑
e3

“The levels of total phenolics, total tannins, and total anthocyanins in wine were enhanced by GA 3 application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 587–697 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatment with 10 and 15 mg L-1 GA3 consistently and significantly increased the concentrations of mavidin, cyanidin and their derivatives in wine.

Taxon
Vitis viniferaVitis viniferae0
Treatment
10 and 15 mg L −1 GA 3e4
Outcome
concentrations of mavidin, cyanidin, and their derivativese4
Direction
increasee4
Qualifier
consistentlye4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Vitis vinifera L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 20–37 · show in text ↑
e4

“10 and 15 mg L −1 GA 3 treatments consistently producing a significant increase in the concentrations of mavidin, cyanidin, and their derivatives”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 704–849 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Application of 15 mg L-1 GA3 consistently and significantly increased trans-resveratrol in wine.

Taxon
Vitis viniferaVitis viniferae0
Treatment
15 mg L −1 GA 3 applicatione5
Outcome
trans ‐resveratrole5
Direction
increasede5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Vitis vinifera L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 20–37 · show in text ↑
e5

“trans ‐resveratrol was consistently significantly increased by 15 mg L −1 GA 3 application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 865–955 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Principal component analysis of phenolic compounds showed differences among wines from GA3 treatment groups and the control.

Taxon
Vitis viniferaVitis viniferae0
Treatment
GA 3 treatment groupse6
Outcome
differences among winese6
Comparator
the controle6

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Vitis vinifera L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 20–37 · show in text ↑
e6

“Principal component analysis of phenolic compounds demonstrated the differences among wines produced from GA 3 treatment groups and the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 957–1100 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend against high GA3 levels because they cause a significant yield decrease.

Taxon
Vitis viniferaVitis viniferae0
Treatment
high levels of GA 3e7
Outcome
not recommendede7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Vitis vinifera L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 20–37 · show in text ↑
e7

“Application of high levels of GA 3 is not recommended due to significant yield decrease”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1239–1326 · show in text ↑

Gibberellic acid · yield · Vitis vinifera (wine grape)Results differ

19 papers: 11 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. positive

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

Gibberellic acid · quality: postharvest · Vitis vinifera (wine grape)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Gibberellic acid · quality: phytochemicals · Vitis vinifera (wine grape)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Gibberellic acid · molecular: metabolites · Vitis vinifera (wine grape)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.