Paper · 1960 · Botanical Gazette

Further Studies with Gibberellin on Vitis vinifera Grapes

Robert J. Weaver; Stanley B. McCune

11
claims
22
verbatim quotes
27
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

1. Flowering clusters of Black Corinth and Thompson Seedless grapes at berry-shatter stage were dipped in GA1 or GA3 at various concentrations. Response to each compound was about equal, as judged by greater berry size in both varieties. 2. GA3 and KGA3 concentrations of 0, 5, 20, or 50 p.p.m. were separately applied to Thompson Seedless at shatter stage by dipping clusters or spraying vines. The compounds were about equally effective in inducing larger berries. 3. In dipping and/or spraying experiments, Black Corinth, Hunisa, and Ohanez showed no greater response to KGA3 and 4-CPA in combination than to either compound applied separately. 4. Carignane clusters at prebloom stage were dipped in KGA3 in the range 0-100 p.p.m. Pollen germinability was markedly decreased by KGA3 at 5-100 p.p.m. and was nil at 100 p.p.m. Treatment with KGA3 at 100 p.p.m. resulted in more berries with a single seed and fewer with three or four seeds. 5. Germinability of pollen obtained from Carignane clusters that had received no chemical treatment was markedly reduced by KGA3 solutions at 1-25 p.p.m., indicating that the compound can act as a pollenicide. 6. Emasculated flowers on girdled or ungirdled vines of Black Corinth, Thompson Seedless, and Tokay received applications of KGA3 and 4-CPA. Girdling resulted in fruit-set in emasculated flowers of Black Corinth, and a good set on ungirdled canes followed treatment with KGA3 or 4-CPA. Emasculated Thompson Seedless flowers failed to set fruit, whether the canes were girdled or ungirdled, but treatment with KGA3 or 4-CPA resulted in setting of fruit. In Tokay, a seeded variety, application of either KGA3 or 4-CPA enhanced the fruit-set from emasculated flowers on ungirdled vines.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GA1 and GA3 produced about equal increases in berry size in Black Corinth and Thompson Seedless.

Taxon
Vitis vinifera GrapesVitis viniferat0
Material
Black Corinth and Thompson Seedlesse0
Treatment
GA1 or GA3e0
Outcome
berry sizee0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
each compounde0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Vitis vinifera Grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–57 · show in text ↑
e0

“Flowering clusters of Black Corinth and Thompson Seedless grapes at berry-shatter stage were dipped in GA1 or GA3 at various concentrations. Response to each compound was about equal, as judged by greater berry size in both varieties.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3–237 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GA3 and KGA3 were about equally effective in inducing larger Thompson Seedless berries.

Taxon
Vitis vinifera GrapesVitis viniferat0
Material
Thompson Seedlesse0
Treatment
GA3 and KGA3e0
Outcome
berriese0
Direction
largere0
Comparator
The compoundse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Vitis vinifera Grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–57 · show in text ↑
e0

“GA3 and KGA3 concentrations of 0, 5, 20, or 50 p.p.m. were separately applied to Thompson Seedless at shatter stage by dipping clusters or spraying vines. The compounds were about equally effective in inducing larger berries.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 241–466 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Black Corinth, Hunisa and Ohanez showed no greater response to combined KGA3 and 4-CPA than to either separately.

Taxon
Vitis vinifera GrapesVitis viniferat0
Material
Black Corinth, Hunisa, and Ohaneze0
Treatment
KGA3 and 4-CPA in combinatione0
Outcome
responsee0
Direction
no greatere0
Comparator
either compound applied separatelye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Vitis vinifera Grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–57 · show in text ↑
e0

“Black Corinth, Hunisa, and Ohanez showed no greater response to KGA3 and 4-CPA in combination than to either compound applied separately”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 510–646 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

KGA3 at 5–100 p.p.m. markedly decreased Carignane pollen germinability, reaching nil at 100 p.p.m.

Taxon
Vitis vinifera GrapesVitis viniferat0
Treatment
KGA3 at 5-100 p.p.m.e0
Outcome
Pollen germinabilitye0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
100 p.p.m.e0

Not reportedMaterialComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Vitis vinifera Grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–57 · show in text ↑
e0

“Pollen germinability was markedly decreased by KGA3 at 5-100 p.p.m. and was nil at 100 p.p.m.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 734–827 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

KGA3 at 100 p.p.m. increased one-seeded berries and decreased three- or four-seeded berries.

Taxon
Vitis vinifera GrapesVitis viniferat0
Treatment
KGA3 at 100 p.p.m.e0
Outcome
berries with a single seede0
Direction
moree0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Vitis vinifera Grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–57 · show in text ↑
e0

“Treatment with KGA3 at 100 p.p.m. resulted in more berries with a single seed and fewer with three or four seeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 828–940 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

KGA3 solutions at 1–25 p.p.m. reduced germinability of untreated Carignane pollen.

Taxon
Vitis vinifera GrapesVitis viniferat0
Material
Carignanee0
Treatment
KGA3 solutions at 1-25 p.p.m.e0
Outcome
Germinability of pollene0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
no chemical treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Vitis vinifera Grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–57 · show in text ↑
e0

“Germinability of pollen obtained from Carignane clusters that had received no chemical treatment was markedly reduced by KGA3 solutions at 1-25 p.p.m.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 945–1095 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Girdling induced fruit set in emasculated Black Corinth flowers.

Taxon
Vitis vinifera GrapesVitis viniferat0
Material
Black Corinthe0
Treatment
Girdlinge0
Outcome
fruit-sete0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Vitis vinifera Grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–57 · show in text ↑
e0

“Girdling resulted in fruit-set in emasculated flowers of Black Corinth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1293–1363 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

KGA3 or 4-CPA induced good fruit set on ungirdled Black Corinth canes.

Taxon
Vitis vinifera GrapesVitis viniferat0
Treatment
KGA3 or 4-CPAe0
Outcome
a good sete0
Comparator
ungirdled canese0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Vitis vinifera Grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–57 · show in text ↑
e0

“a good set on ungirdled canes followed treatment with KGA3 or 4-CPA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1369–1436 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Emasculated Thompson Seedless flowers failed to set fruit with or without girdling.

Taxon
Vitis vinifera GrapesVitis viniferat0
Material
Thompson Seedlesse0
Outcome
failed to set fruite0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Vitis vinifera Grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–57 · show in text ↑
e0

“Emasculated Thompson Seedless flowers failed to set fruit, whether the canes were girdled or ungirdled”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1438–1540 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

KGA3 or 4-CPA treatment caused fruit set in emasculated Thompson Seedless flowers.

Taxon
Vitis vinifera GrapesVitis viniferat0
Treatment
KGA3 or 4-CPAe0
Outcome
setting of fruite0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Vitis vinifera Grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–57 · show in text ↑
e0

“treatment with KGA3 or 4-CPA resulted in setting of fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1546–1603 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

KGA3 or 4-CPA enhanced fruit set from emasculated Tokay flowers on ungirdled vines.

Taxon
Vitis vinifera GrapesVitis viniferat0
Material
Tokaye0
Treatment
either KGA3 or 4-CPAe0
Outcome
fruit-sete0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Vitis vinifera Grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–57 · show in text ↑
e0

“In Tokay, a seeded variety, application of either KGA3 or 4-CPA enhanced the fruit-set from emasculated flowers on ungirdled vines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1605–1735 · show in text ↑

Gibberellic acid · yield · Vitis vinifera (wine grape)Results differ

19 papers: 11 positive, 8 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

(4-chlorophenoxy)acetic acid · yield · Vitis vinifera (wine grape)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

pruning · yield · Vitis vinifera (wine grape)Positive and negative results

95 papers: 41 positive, 54 negative or no effect

40 papers in the same direction as this paper · 51 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

91 papers more in this group

See all 95 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.