Paper · 2006 · Food Science and Technology International

Effects of High O 2 Pretreatment and Gibberellic Acid on Sensorial Quality and Storability of Table Grapes

Y. Deng; Y. Wu; Y. F. Li; et al.

10
claims
25
verbatim quotes
12
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Kyoho grapes ( Vitis vinifera X V. labrusca) were stored under three different treatments at 0°C in 95% relative humidity for 60 days. Grapes in the first treatment were stored in to air (control), in the second treatment the grapes were stored in 80% O 2 for 15 days and then transferred into air for 45 days, and in the third treatment the grapes were sprayed with 100ppm of gibberellic acid (GA) 3 containing 100ppm of Tween 20 and then kept in air. Compared with the air control, high oxygen pretreatment (HOP) and GA 3 maintained higher fruit detachment force and membrane integrity, markedly reduced berry drop, rachis browning and decay and delayed the decrease of soluble solids content (SSC) and vitamin C. In addition, HOP and GA 3 retarded the conversion of protopectin to water-soluble pectin and improved berry firmness. HOP resulted in a significantly firmer berry, less berry drop, and more soluble solids content, total acidity and protopectin than those treated with GA 3 , but did not markedly reduce rachis browning and membrane integrity loss. There were no significant differences in fruit detachment force and water-soluble pectin levels between HOP and GA 3 . In conclusion, high O 2 pretreatment and GA 3 application retained effectively the quality of harvested grapes.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High O2 pretreatment and GA3 maintained higher fruit detachment force and membrane integrity than the air control.

Taxon
Vitis vinifera X V. labruscaVitis viniferae0
Material
Kyohoe0
Treatment
high oxygen pretreatment (HOP) and GA 3e1
Outcome
fruit detachment force and membrane integritye1
Direction
maintained highere1
Comparator
air controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Kyoho grapes ( Vitis vinifera X V. labrusca)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–44 · show in text ↑
e1

“Compared with the air control, high oxygen pretreatment (HOP) and GA 3 maintained higher fruit detachment force and membrane integrity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 453–587 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High O2 pretreatment and GA3 markedly reduced berry drop, rachis browning and decay compared with the air control.

Taxon
Vitis vinifera X V. labruscaVitis viniferae0
Treatment
high oxygen pretreatment (HOP) and GA 3e1
Outcome
berry drop, rachis browning and decaye2
Direction
markedly reducede2
Comparator
air controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Kyoho grapes ( Vitis vinifera X V. labrusca)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–44 · show in text ↑
e1

“Compared with the air control, high oxygen pretreatment (HOP) and GA 3 maintained higher fruit detachment force and membrane integrity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 453–587 · show in text ↑
e2

“markedly reduced berry drop, rachis browning and decay”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 589–643 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High O2 pretreatment and GA3 delayed the decrease of soluble solids content and vitamin C compared with the air control.

Taxon
Vitis vinifera X V. labruscaVitis viniferae0
Treatment
high oxygen pretreatment (HOP) and GA 3e1
Outcome
soluble solids content (SSC) and vitamin Ce3
Direction
delayede3
Comparator
air controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Kyoho grapes ( Vitis vinifera X V. labrusca)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–44 · show in text ↑
e1

“Compared with the air control, high oxygen pretreatment (HOP) and GA 3 maintained higher fruit detachment force and membrane integrity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 453–587 · show in text ↑
e3

“delayed the decrease of soluble solids content (SSC) and vitamin C”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 648–714 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High O2 pretreatment and GA3 retarded the conversion of protopectin to water-soluble pectin.

Taxon
Vitis vinifera X V. labruscaVitis viniferae0
Treatment
HOP and GA 3e5
Outcome
conversion of protopectin to water-soluble pectine5
Direction
retardede5
Comparator
air controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Kyoho grapes ( Vitis vinifera X V. labrusca)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–44 · show in text ↑
e1

“Compared with the air control, high oxygen pretreatment (HOP) and GA 3 maintained higher fruit detachment force and membrane integrity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 453–587 · show in text ↑
e5

“In addition, HOP and GA 3 retarded the conversion of protopectin to water-soluble pectin and improved berry firmness”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 716–832 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High O2 pretreatment and GA3 improved berry firmness compared with the air control.

Taxon
Vitis vinifera X V. labruscaVitis viniferae0
Treatment
HOP and GA 3e5
Outcome
berry firmnesse5
Direction
improvede5
Comparator
air controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Kyoho grapes ( Vitis vinifera X V. labrusca)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–44 · show in text ↑
e1

“Compared with the air control, high oxygen pretreatment (HOP) and GA 3 maintained higher fruit detachment force and membrane integrity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 453–587 · show in text ↑
e5

“In addition, HOP and GA 3 retarded the conversion of protopectin to water-soluble pectin and improved berry firmness”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 716–832 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

High O2 pretreatment made berries significantly firmer than GA3 treatment.

Taxon
Vitis vinifera X V. labruscaVitis viniferae0
Treatment
HOPe6
Outcome
berrye6
Direction
significantly firmere6
Comparator
GA 3e6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Kyoho grapes ( Vitis vinifera X V. labrusca)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–44 · show in text ↑
e6

“HOP resulted in a significantly firmer berry, less berry drop, and more soluble solids content, total acidity and protopectin than those treated with GA 3”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 834–988 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High O2 pretreatment resulted in less berry drop than GA3 treatment.

Taxon
Vitis vinifera X V. labruscaVitis viniferae0
Treatment
HOPe6
Outcome
berry drope6
Direction
lesse6
Comparator
GA 3e6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Kyoho grapes ( Vitis vinifera X V. labrusca)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–44 · show in text ↑
e6

“HOP resulted in a significantly firmer berry, less berry drop, and more soluble solids content, total acidity and protopectin than those treated with GA 3”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 834–988 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High O2 pretreatment resulted in more soluble solids content, total acidity and protopectin than GA3 treatment.

Taxon
Vitis vinifera X V. labruscaVitis viniferae0
Treatment
HOPe6
Outcome
soluble solids content, total acidity and protopectine6
Direction
moree6
Comparator
GA 3e6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Kyoho grapes ( Vitis vinifera X V. labrusca)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–44 · show in text ↑
e6

“HOP resulted in a significantly firmer berry, less berry drop, and more soluble solids content, total acidity and protopectin than those treated with GA 3”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 834–988 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

High O2 pretreatment and GA3 did not differ in fruit detachment force or water-soluble pectin levels.

Taxon
Vitis vinifera X V. labruscaVitis viniferae0
Treatment
HOPe7
Outcome
fruit detachment force and water-soluble pectin levelse7
Direction
no significant differencese7
Comparator
GA 3e7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Kyoho grapes ( Vitis vinifera X V. labrusca)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–44 · show in text ↑
e7

“There were no significant differences in fruit detachment force and water-soluble pectin levels between HOP and GA 3”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1064–1180 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High O2 pretreatment did not markedly reduce rachis browning or membrane integrity loss.

Taxon
Vitis vinifera X V. labruscaVitis viniferae0
Treatment
HOPe6
Outcome
rachis browning and membrane integrity losse7
Direction
did not markedly reducee7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Kyoho grapes ( Vitis vinifera X V. labrusca)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–44 · show in text ↑
e6

“HOP resulted in a significantly firmer berry, less berry drop, and more soluble solids content, total acidity and protopectin than those treated with GA 3”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 834–988 · show in text ↑
e7

“but did not markedly reduce rachis browning and membrane integrity loss”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 991–1062 · show in text ↑

Gibberellic acid · disease · Vitis vinifera (wine grape)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

Gibberellic acid · quality: postharvest · Vitis vinifera (wine grape)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Gibberellic acid · molecular: metabolites · Vitis vinifera (wine grape)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.