Paper · 2020 · Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture

Effects of gibberellic acid (GA3) application before anthesis on rachis elongation and berry quality and aroma and flavour compounds in Vitis vinifera L. ‘Cabernet Franc’ and ‘Cabernet Sauvignon’ grapes

Xiao‐Tong Gao; Ming‐Hui Wu; Dan Sun; et al.

10
claims
26
verbatim quotes
27
citations
4
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract BACKGROUND Gibberellic acid (GA 3 ), a plant‐growth regulator, is often used to obtain enlarged table grape berries and induce seedlessness in them. However, the effects of GA 3 on rachis elongation and bunch compactness have seldom been reported in wine‐grape production. We assessed the effects of GA 3 spraying on wine‐grape inflorescences and bunches and their practical implications for viticulture in the Jiaodong Peninsula, China. RESULTS Various GA 3 concentrations were sprayed on field‐grown Vitis vinifera L. ‘Cabernet Franc’ (CF) and ‘Cabernet Sauvignon’ (CS) grapevines before anthesis in the Jiaodong Peninsula, China, in 2015 and 2016. Inflorescence length during berry development was measured, and flavonoids and aroma compounds in the fruit were detected by high‐performance liquid chromatography – mass spectrometry (HPLC‐MS) and gas chromatography – mass spectrometry (GC‐MS), respectively. For both cultivars, 50 and 100 mg L −1 GA 3 caused significant elongation of the rachis, whereas there was no significant effect on inflorescence growth and berry seed number. Anthocyanin, flavonol, and flavan‐3‐ol levels in mature berries were not significantly influenced by GA 3 spraying, whereas C 13 ‐norisoprenoids were modified. CONCLUSION The application of 50‐100 mg L −1 GA 3 prior to grapevine anthesis caused elongation of inflorescences and bunches, and eased cluster compactness in CF and CS, and no negative effects were observed on the yield and seed numbers. The concentration and composition of flavonoids and most aroma compounds were not influenced, except that the norisoprenoids were increased by 50 mg L −1 GA 3 applications. © 2020 Society of Chemical Industry

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

50 mg L −1 GA 3 significantly elongated the rachis of both cultivars.

Taxon
Vitis vinifera L.Vitis viniferae1
Treatment
50 mg L −1 GA 3e2
Outcome
rachise0
Direction
elongatione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“For both cultivars, 50 and 100 mg L −1 GA 3 caused significant elongation of the rachis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 920–1007 · show in text ↑
e1

“Vitis vinifera L. ‘Cabernet Franc’ (CF) and ‘Cabernet Sauvignon’ (CS) grapevines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 511–591 · show in text ↑
e2

“the norisoprenoids were increased by 50 mg L −1 GA 3 applications”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1602–1667 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

100 mg L −1 GA 3 significantly elongated the rachis of both cultivars.

Taxon
Vitis vinifera L.Vitis viniferae1
Treatment
100 mg L −1 GA 3e0
Outcome
rachise0
Direction
elongatione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“For both cultivars, 50 and 100 mg L −1 GA 3 caused significant elongation of the rachis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 920–1007 · show in text ↑
e1

“Vitis vinifera L. ‘Cabernet Franc’ (CF) and ‘Cabernet Sauvignon’ (CS) grapevines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 511–591 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

GA3 did not significantly affect inflorescence growth.

Taxon
Vitis vinifera L.Vitis viniferae2
Treatment
GA 3e1
Outcome
inflorescence growthe0
Direction
no significant effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“there was no significant effect on inflorescence growth and berry seed number”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1017–1094 · show in text ↑
e1

“GA 3 caused significant elongation of the rachis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 959–1007 · show in text ↑
e2

“Vitis vinifera L. ‘Cabernet Franc’ (CF) and ‘Cabernet Sauvignon’ (CS) grapevines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 511–591 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

GA3 did not significantly affect berry seed number.

Taxon
Vitis vinifera L.Vitis viniferae2
Treatment
GA 3e1
Outcome
berry seed numbere0
Direction
no significant effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“there was no significant effect on inflorescence growth and berry seed number”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1017–1094 · show in text ↑
e1

“GA 3 caused significant elongation of the rachis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 959–1007 · show in text ↑
e2

“Vitis vinifera L. ‘Cabernet Franc’ (CF) and ‘Cabernet Sauvignon’ (CS) grapevines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 511–591 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

GA3 did not significantly affect mature berry anthocyanins, flavonols or flavan 3 ols.

Taxon
Vitis vinifera L.Vitis viniferae1
Organ / stage
mature berriese0
Treatment
GA 3 sprayinge0
Outcome
Anthocyanin, flavonol, and flavan‐3‐ol levelse0
Direction
not significantly influencede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Anthocyanin, flavonol, and flavan‐3‐ol levels in mature berries were not significantly influenced by GA 3 spraying”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1096–1210 · show in text ↑
e1

“Vitis vinifera L. ‘Cabernet Franc’ (CF) and ‘Cabernet Sauvignon’ (CS) grapevines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 511–591 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GA3 modified C 13 norisoprenoids.

Taxon
Vitis vinifera L.Vitis viniferae2
Treatment
GA 3 sprayinge1
Outcome
C 13 ‐norisoprenoidse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“C 13 ‐norisoprenoids were modified”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1220–1254 · show in text ↑
e1

“by GA 3 spraying”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1194–1210 · show in text ↑
e2

“Vitis vinifera L. ‘Cabernet Franc’ (CF) and ‘Cabernet Sauvignon’ (CS) grapevines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 511–591 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pre anthesis GA3 reduced cluster compactness in both cultivars.

Taxon
Vitis vinifera L.Vitis viniferae1
Treatment
50‐100 mg L −1 GA 3e0
Outcome
cluster compactnesse0
Direction
easede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The application of 50‐100 mg L −1 GA 3 prior to grapevine anthesis caused elongation of inflorescences and bunches, and eased cluster compactness in CF and CS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1267–1425 · show in text ↑
e1

“Vitis vinifera L. ‘Cabernet Franc’ (CF) and ‘Cabernet Sauvignon’ (CS) grapevines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 511–591 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pre anthesis GA3 did not negatively affect yield.

Taxon
Vitis vinifera L.Vitis viniferae2
Treatment
50‐100 mg L −1 GA 3e1
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
no negative effectse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“no negative effects were observed on the yield and seed numbers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1431–1494 · show in text ↑
e1

“The application of 50‐100 mg L −1 GA 3 prior to grapevine anthesis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1267–1333 · show in text ↑
e2

“Vitis vinifera L. ‘Cabernet Franc’ (CF) and ‘Cabernet Sauvignon’ (CS) grapevines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 511–591 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Most aroma compound composition was unaffected by GA3.

Taxon
Vitis vinifera L.Vitis viniferae2
Treatment
GA 3 applicationse1
Outcome
most aroma compoundse0
Direction
not influencede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The concentration and composition of flavonoids and most aroma compounds were not influenced”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1496–1588 · show in text ↑
e1

“GA 3 applications”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1650–1667 · show in text ↑
e2

“Vitis vinifera L. ‘Cabernet Franc’ (CF) and ‘Cabernet Sauvignon’ (CS) grapevines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 511–591 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

50 mg L −1 GA3 increased norisoprenoids.

Taxon
Vitis vinifera L.Vitis viniferae1
Treatment
50 mg L −1 GA 3 applicationse0
Outcome
norisoprenoidse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the norisoprenoids were increased by 50 mg L −1 GA 3 applications”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1602–1667 · show in text ↑
e1

“Vitis vinifera L. ‘Cabernet Franc’ (CF) and ‘Cabernet Sauvignon’ (CS) grapevines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 511–591 · show in text ↑

Gibberellic acid · yield · Vitis vinifera (wine grape)Results differ

19 papers: 11 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

Gibberellic acid · quality: phytochemicals · Vitis vinifera (wine grape)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Gibberellic acid · molecular: metabolites · Vitis vinifera (wine grape)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

application · quality: phytochemicals · Vitis vinifera (wine grape)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 9 positive, 1 negative or no effect

9 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.