Paper · 2022 · Assiut Journal of Agricultural Sciences/Assuit Journal of Agricultural Sciences

Effect of Irrigation Intervals and Foliar Spray with Salicylic Acid on the production of Two Bread wheat cultivars in Newly Reclaimed Land

El-Saadi Abdel-Hamid Ali Abdel-Mawla; M.N.T. Abd EL-Kader; A. S.M. Morsy; et al.

19
claims
38
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

In the present study, we estimated the yield and its attributes as well as water use efficiency of two bread wheat cultivars, i.e., Shandaweel-1 and Giza-171 under three irrigation intervals, i.e., irrigation every 6, 9 and 12 days, and three concentrations of salicylic acid, i.e., 0.0, 150, and 300 ppm which was done at a private farm in the village of Al-Ghuraira, Esna center, Luxor governorate upper Egypt during 2018/2019 and 2019/2020 seasons. This study was laid out in a strip-split plot arrangement was based on a randomized complete block design (RCBD) with three replications. The results indicated that increasing irrigation intervals (I) from 6 up to 9 or 12 days significantly decreased vegetative traits, yield and yield attributes traits, i.e., plant height, flag leaf area, spike length., number of kernels spike-1, kernels weight spike-1, 1000-grain weight as well as grain yield fed.-1, but significantly increased grain protein content (%), water use efficiency (WUE) and water saving% in both seasons. The Foliar application of 300 ppm of salicylic acid (SA3) had significantly increased all the yield and its attributes traits compared to the control treatment (SA1) As well as improving WUE under the conditions of irrigation periods every 9 and 12 days. Shandaweel-1 cultivar outperformed Giza-171 cultivar in plant height, spike length, grain yield and WUE in both seasons, and number of kernels spike-1 in the 1st season. Likewise, Giza-171 surpassed Shandaweel-1 in flag leaf area, kernels weight spike-1, 1000-grain weight and protein% in both seasons, and number of kernels spike-1 in 2nd season. Furthermore, the second order interaction I6×SA3×WC2 gave the highest value for 1000-grain weight (78.0 g) in the 1st season only.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 19

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Longer irrigation intervals significantly decreased plant height.

Taxon
bread wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
increasing irrigation intervals (I) from 6 up to 9 or 12 dayse0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
decreasede0
Comparator
6e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increasing irrigation intervals (I) from 6 up to 9 or 12 days significantly decreased vegetative traits, yield and yield attributes traits, i.e., plant height, flag leaf area, spike length., number of kernels spike-1, kernels weight spike-1, 1000-grain weight as well as grain yield fed.-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 617–906 · show in text ↑
t0

“bread wheat”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 93–104 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Longer irrigation intervals significantly decreased flag leaf area.

Taxon
bread wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
increasing irrigation intervals (I) from 6 up to 9 or 12 dayse0
Outcome
flag leaf areae0
Direction
decreasede0
Comparator
6e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increasing irrigation intervals (I) from 6 up to 9 or 12 days significantly decreased vegetative traits, yield and yield attributes traits, i.e., plant height, flag leaf area, spike length., number of kernels spike-1, kernels weight spike-1, 1000-grain weight as well as grain yield fed.-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 617–906 · show in text ↑
t0

“bread wheat”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 93–104 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Longer irrigation intervals significantly decreased spike length.

Taxon
bread wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
increasing irrigation intervals (I) from 6 up to 9 or 12 dayse0
Outcome
spike lengthe0
Direction
decreasede0
Comparator
6e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increasing irrigation intervals (I) from 6 up to 9 or 12 days significantly decreased vegetative traits, yield and yield attributes traits, i.e., plant height, flag leaf area, spike length., number of kernels spike-1, kernels weight spike-1, 1000-grain weight as well as grain yield fed.-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 617–906 · show in text ↑
t0

“bread wheat”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 93–104 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Longer irrigation intervals significantly decreased number of kernels spike-1.

Taxon
bread wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
increasing irrigation intervals (I) from 6 up to 9 or 12 dayse0
Outcome
number of kernels spike-1e0
Direction
decreasede0
Comparator
6e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increasing irrigation intervals (I) from 6 up to 9 or 12 days significantly decreased vegetative traits, yield and yield attributes traits, i.e., plant height, flag leaf area, spike length., number of kernels spike-1, kernels weight spike-1, 1000-grain weight as well as grain yield fed.-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 617–906 · show in text ↑
t0

“bread wheat”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 93–104 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Longer irrigation intervals significantly decreased kernels weight spike-1.

Taxon
bread wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
increasing irrigation intervals (I) from 6 up to 9 or 12 dayse0
Outcome
kernels weight spike-1e0
Direction
decreasede0
Comparator
6e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increasing irrigation intervals (I) from 6 up to 9 or 12 days significantly decreased vegetative traits, yield and yield attributes traits, i.e., plant height, flag leaf area, spike length., number of kernels spike-1, kernels weight spike-1, 1000-grain weight as well as grain yield fed.-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 617–906 · show in text ↑
t0

“bread wheat”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 93–104 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Longer irrigation intervals significantly decreased 1000-grain weight.

Taxon
bread wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
increasing irrigation intervals (I) from 6 up to 9 or 12 dayse0
Outcome
1000-grain weighte0
Direction
decreasede0
Comparator
6e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increasing irrigation intervals (I) from 6 up to 9 or 12 days significantly decreased vegetative traits, yield and yield attributes traits, i.e., plant height, flag leaf area, spike length., number of kernels spike-1, kernels weight spike-1, 1000-grain weight as well as grain yield fed.-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 617–906 · show in text ↑
t0

“bread wheat”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 93–104 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Longer irrigation intervals significantly decreased grain yield fed.-1.

Taxon
bread wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
increasing irrigation intervals (I) from 6 up to 9 or 12 dayse0
Outcome
grain yield fed.-1e0
Direction
decreasede0
Comparator
6e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increasing irrigation intervals (I) from 6 up to 9 or 12 days significantly decreased vegetative traits, yield and yield attributes traits, i.e., plant height, flag leaf area, spike length., number of kernels spike-1, kernels weight spike-1, 1000-grain weight as well as grain yield fed.-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 617–906 · show in text ↑
t0

“bread wheat”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 93–104 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Longer irrigation intervals significantly increased grain protein content (%).

Taxon
bread wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Irrigation Intervalst0
Outcome
grain protein content (%)e0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“but significantly increased grain protein content (%), water use efficiency (WUE) and water saving% in both seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 908–1023 · show in text ↑
t0

“Irrigation Intervals and Foliar Spray with Salicylic Acid on the production of Two Bread wheat cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–114 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Longer irrigation intervals significantly increased water use efficiency (WUE).

Taxon
bread wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Irrigation Intervalst0
Outcome
water use efficiency (WUE)e0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“but significantly increased grain protein content (%), water use efficiency (WUE) and water saving% in both seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 908–1023 · show in text ↑
t0

“Irrigation Intervals and Foliar Spray with Salicylic Acid on the production of Two Bread wheat cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–114 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Longer irrigation intervals significantly increased water saving%.

Taxon
bread wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Irrigation Intervalst0
Outcome
water saving%e0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“but significantly increased grain protein content (%), water use efficiency (WUE) and water saving% in both seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 908–1023 · show in text ↑
t0

“Irrigation Intervals and Foliar Spray with Salicylic Acid on the production of Two Bread wheat cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–114 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar 300 ppm salicylic acid increased yield and yield attributes versus control.

Taxon
bread wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Foliar application of 300 ppm of salicylic acid (SA3)e0
Outcome
yield and its attributes traitse0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
control treatment (SA1)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The Foliar application of 300 ppm of salicylic acid (SA3) had significantly increased all the yield and its attributes traits compared to the control treatment (SA1) As well as improving WUE under the conditions of irrigation periods every 9 and 12 days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1025–1278 · show in text ↑
t0

“bread wheat”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 93–104 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar 300 ppm salicylic acid improved WUE under 9- and 12-day irrigation.

Taxon
bread wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Foliar application of 300 ppm of salicylic acid (SA3)e0
Outcome
WUEe0
Direction
improvinge0
Qualifier
irrigation periods every 9 and 12 dayse0
Comparator
control treatment (SA1)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The Foliar application of 300 ppm of salicylic acid (SA3) had significantly increased all the yield and its attributes traits compared to the control treatment (SA1) As well as improving WUE under the conditions of irrigation periods every 9 and 12 days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1025–1278 · show in text ↑
t0

“bread wheat”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 93–104 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shandaweel-1 exceeded Giza-171 in plant height, spike length and grain yield.

Taxon
bread wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material
Shandaweel-1e0
Outcome
plant height, spike length, grain yielde0
Direction
outperformede0
Comparator
Giza-171e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Shandaweel-1 cultivar outperformed Giza-171 cultivar in plant height, spike length, grain yield and WUE in both seasons, and number of kernels spike-1 in the 1st season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1280–1448 · show in text ↑
t0

“bread wheat”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 93–104 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shandaweel-1 exceeded Giza-171 in WUE in both seasons.

Taxon
bread wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material
Shandaweel-1e0
Outcome
WUEe0
Direction
outperformede0
Comparator
Giza-171e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Shandaweel-1 cultivar outperformed Giza-171 cultivar in plant height, spike length, grain yield and WUE in both seasons, and number of kernels spike-1 in the 1st season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1280–1448 · show in text ↑
t0

“bread wheat”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 93–104 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shandaweel-1 exceeded Giza-171 in kernels per spike in the first season.

Taxon
bread wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material
Shandaweel-1e0
Outcome
number of kernels spike-1e0
Direction
outperformede0
Comparator
Giza-171e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Shandaweel-1 cultivar outperformed Giza-171 cultivar in plant height, spike length, grain yield and WUE in both seasons, and number of kernels spike-1 in the 1st season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1280–1448 · show in text ↑
t0

“bread wheat”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 93–104 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Giza-171 exceeded Shandaweel-1 in flag leaf area, kernel weight per spike and thousand-grain weight.

Taxon
bread wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material
Giza-171e0
Outcome
flag leaf area, kernels weight spike-1, 1000-grain weighte0
Direction
surpassede0
Comparator
Shandaweel-1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Giza-171 surpassed Shandaweel-1 in flag leaf area, kernels weight spike-1, 1000-grain weight and protein% in both seasons, and number of kernels spike-1 in 2nd season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1460–1626 · show in text ↑
t0

“bread wheat”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 93–104 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Giza-171 exceeded Shandaweel-1 in protein percentage.

Taxon
bread wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material
Giza-171e0
Outcome
protein%e0
Direction
surpassede0
Comparator
Shandaweel-1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Giza-171 surpassed Shandaweel-1 in flag leaf area, kernels weight spike-1, 1000-grain weight and protein% in both seasons, and number of kernels spike-1 in 2nd season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1460–1626 · show in text ↑
t0

“bread wheat”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 93–104 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Giza-171 exceeded Shandaweel-1 in kernels per spike in the second season.

Taxon
bread wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material
Giza-171e0
Outcome
number of kernels spike-1e0
Direction
surpassede0
Comparator
Shandaweel-1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Giza-171 surpassed Shandaweel-1 in flag leaf area, kernels weight spike-1, 1000-grain weight and protein% in both seasons, and number of kernels spike-1 in 2nd season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1460–1626 · show in text ↑
t0

“bread wheat”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 93–104 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The I6×SA3×WC2 interaction gave the highest thousand-grain weight, 78.0 g, in the first season.

Taxon
bread wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
I6×SA3×WC2e0
Outcome
1000-grain weighte0
Direction
higheste0
Value
78.0 ge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the second order interaction I6×SA3×WC2 gave the highest value for 1000-grain weight (78.0 g) in the 1st season only”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1641–1757 · show in text ↑
t0

“bread wheat”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 93–104 · show in text ↑

salicylic acid · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

85 papers: 81 positive, 4 negative or no effect

80 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

81 papers more in this group

See all 85 papers →

salicylic acid · physiology: water · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

23 papers: 23 positive, 0 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

irrigation · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

80 papers: 50 positive, 30 negative or no effect

49 papers in the same direction as this paper · 29 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. no effect

76 papers more in this group

See all 80 papers →

application · physiology: water · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

51 papers: 49 positive, 2 negative or no effect

48 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

47 papers more in this group

See all 51 papers →

irrigation · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

242 papers: 177 positive, 65 negative or no effect

64 papers in the same direction as this paper · 177 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

238 papers more in this group

See all 242 papers →

irrigation · physiology: water · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

303 papers: 253 positive, 50 negative or no effect

252 papers in the same direction as this paper · 49 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

299 papers more in this group

See all 303 papers →

application · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

877 papers: 795 positive, 82 negative or no effect

794 papers in the same direction as this paper · 75 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

873 papers more in this group

See all 877 papers →

irrigation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

989 papers: 798 positive, 191 negative or no effect

190 papers in the same direction as this paper · 798 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

985 papers more in this group

See all 989 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.