Paper · 2022 · International Journal of Plant & Soil Science

Comparative Efficacy of Insecticides, NSKE and Karanj Oil against Shoot and Fruit Borer, Earias vittella (Fabricius.) on Okra

Nikhil Lella; Anoorag R. Tayde; Kommoji Phani Sai

14
claims
28
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field trail was conducted at Central Research Farm, SHUATS, Naini, Prayagraj, U.P. during kharif season of 2021. The field was laid in Randomised block Design with seven treatments replicated thrice viz., Neem oil 3%, Indoxacarb 14.5% SC, Lambda cyhalothrin 5% EC, NSKE 5%, Emamectin benzoate 5SG, Karanj oil 2%, Flubendiamide 480 SC along with control plot. The results after first and second spray revealed that among the different treatments, Emamectin benzoate 5SG (10.82% and 11.64%) recorded lowest percent infestation of Earias vittella followed by Flubendiamide 480 SC (15.92% and 17.25%), Indoxacarb 14.5SC (17.06% and 18.45%), Lambda cyhalothrin 5% EC (18.13% and 18.52%), Neem oil 3% (20.44% and 20.69%), NSKE 5% (21.44% and 21.12%) and Karanj oil 2% (24.16% and 23.61) was the least effective among all treatments with percent shoot and fruit infestation respectively. Among all treatments studied, the best and most economical treatment was Emamectin benzoate 5SG (1:5.60), Flubendiamide 480 SC (1:5.44), Indoxacarb 14.5SC (1:5.33), Lambda cyhalothrin 5% EC (1:5.08) followed by Neem oil 3% (1:4.89), NSKE 5% (1:4.81) and the least cost benefit ratio was observed in Karanj oil 2% (1:4.66) when compared to control plot (1:2.82).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Emamectin benzoate 5SG had infestation of 10.82% and 11.64%

Treatment
Emamectin benzoate 5SGe0
Interactor
Earias vittellaEarias vittellae0pest
Outcome
percent shoot and fruit infestatione0
Direction
loweste0
Value
10.82% and 11.64%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Earias vittella
Earias vittella · InteractorKomal et al. (2021) · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Emamectin benzoate 5SG (10.82% and 11.64%) recorded lowest percent infestation of Earias vittella followed by Flubendiamide 480 SC (15.92% and 17.25%), Indoxacarb 14.5SC (17.06% and 18.45%), Lambda cyhalothrin 5% EC (18.13% and 18.52%), Neem oil 3% (20.44% and 20.69%), NSKE 5% (21.44% and 21.12%) and Karanj oil 2% (24.16% and 23.61) was the least effective among all treatments with percent shoot and fruit infestation respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 448–882 · show in text ↑
t0

“Okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 121–125 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flubendiamide 480 SC had infestation of 15.92% and 17.25%

Treatment
Flubendiamide 480 SCe0
Interactor
Earias vittellaEarias vittellae0pest
Outcome
percent shoot and fruit infestatione0
Direction
followed bye0
Value
15.92% and 17.25%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Earias vittella
Earias vittella · InteractorKomal et al. (2021) · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Emamectin benzoate 5SG (10.82% and 11.64%) recorded lowest percent infestation of Earias vittella followed by Flubendiamide 480 SC (15.92% and 17.25%), Indoxacarb 14.5SC (17.06% and 18.45%), Lambda cyhalothrin 5% EC (18.13% and 18.52%), Neem oil 3% (20.44% and 20.69%), NSKE 5% (21.44% and 21.12%) and Karanj oil 2% (24.16% and 23.61) was the least effective among all treatments with percent shoot and fruit infestation respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 448–882 · show in text ↑
t0

“Okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 121–125 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Indoxacarb 14.5SC had infestation of 17.06% and 18.45%

Treatment
Indoxacarb 14.5SCe0
Interactor
Earias vittellaEarias vittellae0pest
Outcome
percent shoot and fruit infestatione0
Direction
followed bye0
Value
17.06% and 18.45%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Earias vittella
Earias vittella · InteractorKomal et al. (2021) · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Emamectin benzoate 5SG (10.82% and 11.64%) recorded lowest percent infestation of Earias vittella followed by Flubendiamide 480 SC (15.92% and 17.25%), Indoxacarb 14.5SC (17.06% and 18.45%), Lambda cyhalothrin 5% EC (18.13% and 18.52%), Neem oil 3% (20.44% and 20.69%), NSKE 5% (21.44% and 21.12%) and Karanj oil 2% (24.16% and 23.61) was the least effective among all treatments with percent shoot and fruit infestation respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 448–882 · show in text ↑
t0

“Okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 121–125 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lambda cyhalothrin 5% EC had infestation of 18.13% and 18.52%

Treatment
Lambda cyhalothrin 5% ECe0
Interactor
Earias vittellaEarias vittellae0pest
Outcome
percent shoot and fruit infestatione0
Direction
followed bye0
Value
18.13% and 18.52%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Earias vittella
Earias vittella · InteractorKomal et al. (2021) · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Emamectin benzoate 5SG (10.82% and 11.64%) recorded lowest percent infestation of Earias vittella followed by Flubendiamide 480 SC (15.92% and 17.25%), Indoxacarb 14.5SC (17.06% and 18.45%), Lambda cyhalothrin 5% EC (18.13% and 18.52%), Neem oil 3% (20.44% and 20.69%), NSKE 5% (21.44% and 21.12%) and Karanj oil 2% (24.16% and 23.61) was the least effective among all treatments with percent shoot and fruit infestation respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 448–882 · show in text ↑
t0

“Okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 121–125 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Neem oil 3% had infestation of 20.44% and 20.69%

Treatment
Neem oil 3%e0
Interactor
Earias vittellaEarias vittellae0pest
Outcome
percent shoot and fruit infestatione0
Direction
followed bye0
Value
20.44% and 20.69%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Earias vittella
Earias vittella · InteractorKomal et al. (2021) · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Emamectin benzoate 5SG (10.82% and 11.64%) recorded lowest percent infestation of Earias vittella followed by Flubendiamide 480 SC (15.92% and 17.25%), Indoxacarb 14.5SC (17.06% and 18.45%), Lambda cyhalothrin 5% EC (18.13% and 18.52%), Neem oil 3% (20.44% and 20.69%), NSKE 5% (21.44% and 21.12%) and Karanj oil 2% (24.16% and 23.61) was the least effective among all treatments with percent shoot and fruit infestation respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 448–882 · show in text ↑
t0

“Okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 121–125 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NSKE 5% had infestation of 21.44% and 21.12%

Treatment
NSKE 5%e0
Interactor
Earias vittellaEarias vittellae0pest
Outcome
percent shoot and fruit infestatione0
Direction
followed bye0
Value
21.44% and 21.12%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Earias vittella
Earias vittella · InteractorKomal et al. (2021) · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Emamectin benzoate 5SG (10.82% and 11.64%) recorded lowest percent infestation of Earias vittella followed by Flubendiamide 480 SC (15.92% and 17.25%), Indoxacarb 14.5SC (17.06% and 18.45%), Lambda cyhalothrin 5% EC (18.13% and 18.52%), Neem oil 3% (20.44% and 20.69%), NSKE 5% (21.44% and 21.12%) and Karanj oil 2% (24.16% and 23.61) was the least effective among all treatments with percent shoot and fruit infestation respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 448–882 · show in text ↑
t0

“Okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 121–125 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Karanj oil 2% had infestation of 24.16% and 23.61

Treatment
Karanj oil 2%e0
Interactor
Earias vittellaEarias vittellae0pest
Outcome
percent shoot and fruit infestatione0
Direction
least effectivee0
Value
24.16% and 23.61e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Earias vittella
Earias vittella · InteractorKomal et al. (2021) · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Emamectin benzoate 5SG (10.82% and 11.64%) recorded lowest percent infestation of Earias vittella followed by Flubendiamide 480 SC (15.92% and 17.25%), Indoxacarb 14.5SC (17.06% and 18.45%), Lambda cyhalothrin 5% EC (18.13% and 18.52%), Neem oil 3% (20.44% and 20.69%), NSKE 5% (21.44% and 21.12%) and Karanj oil 2% (24.16% and 23.61) was the least effective among all treatments with percent shoot and fruit infestation respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 448–882 · show in text ↑
t0

“Okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 121–125 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Emamectin benzoate 5SG had cost benefit ratio 1:5.60

Treatment
Emamectin benzoate 5SGe0
Outcome
cost benefit ratioe0
Direction
beste0
Value
1:5.60e0
Qualifier
1:2.82e0
Comparator
control plote0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Among all treatments studied, the best and most economical treatment was Emamectin benzoate 5SG (1:5.60), Flubendiamide 480 SC (1:5.44), Indoxacarb 14.5SC (1:5.33), Lambda cyhalothrin 5% EC (1:5.08) followed by Neem oil 3% (1:4.89), NSKE 5% (1:4.81) and the least cost benefit ratio was observed in Karanj oil 2% (1:4.66) when compared to control plot (1:2.82).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 883–1244 · show in text ↑
t0

“Okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 121–125 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flubendiamide 480 SC had cost benefit ratio 1:5.44

Treatment
Flubendiamide 480 SCe0
Outcome
cost benefit ratioe0
Direction
followed bye0
Value
1:5.44e0
Qualifier
1:2.82e0
Comparator
control plote0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Among all treatments studied, the best and most economical treatment was Emamectin benzoate 5SG (1:5.60), Flubendiamide 480 SC (1:5.44), Indoxacarb 14.5SC (1:5.33), Lambda cyhalothrin 5% EC (1:5.08) followed by Neem oil 3% (1:4.89), NSKE 5% (1:4.81) and the least cost benefit ratio was observed in Karanj oil 2% (1:4.66) when compared to control plot (1:2.82).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 883–1244 · show in text ↑
t0

“Okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 121–125 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Indoxacarb 14.5SC had cost benefit ratio 1:5.33

Treatment
Indoxacarb 14.5SCe0
Outcome
cost benefit ratioe0
Direction
followed bye0
Value
1:5.33e0
Qualifier
1:2.82e0
Comparator
control plote0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Among all treatments studied, the best and most economical treatment was Emamectin benzoate 5SG (1:5.60), Flubendiamide 480 SC (1:5.44), Indoxacarb 14.5SC (1:5.33), Lambda cyhalothrin 5% EC (1:5.08) followed by Neem oil 3% (1:4.89), NSKE 5% (1:4.81) and the least cost benefit ratio was observed in Karanj oil 2% (1:4.66) when compared to control plot (1:2.82).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 883–1244 · show in text ↑
t0

“Okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 121–125 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lambda cyhalothrin 5% EC had cost benefit ratio 1:5.08

Treatment
Lambda cyhalothrin 5% ECe0
Outcome
cost benefit ratioe0
Direction
followed bye0
Value
1:5.08e0
Qualifier
1:2.82e0
Comparator
control plote0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Among all treatments studied, the best and most economical treatment was Emamectin benzoate 5SG (1:5.60), Flubendiamide 480 SC (1:5.44), Indoxacarb 14.5SC (1:5.33), Lambda cyhalothrin 5% EC (1:5.08) followed by Neem oil 3% (1:4.89), NSKE 5% (1:4.81) and the least cost benefit ratio was observed in Karanj oil 2% (1:4.66) when compared to control plot (1:2.82).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 883–1244 · show in text ↑
t0

“Okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 121–125 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Neem oil 3% had cost benefit ratio 1:4.89

Treatment
Neem oil 3%e0
Outcome
cost benefit ratioe0
Direction
followed bye0
Value
1:4.89e0
Qualifier
1:2.82e0
Comparator
control plote0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Among all treatments studied, the best and most economical treatment was Emamectin benzoate 5SG (1:5.60), Flubendiamide 480 SC (1:5.44), Indoxacarb 14.5SC (1:5.33), Lambda cyhalothrin 5% EC (1:5.08) followed by Neem oil 3% (1:4.89), NSKE 5% (1:4.81) and the least cost benefit ratio was observed in Karanj oil 2% (1:4.66) when compared to control plot (1:2.82).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 883–1244 · show in text ↑
t0

“Okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 121–125 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NSKE 5% had cost benefit ratio 1:4.81

Treatment
NSKE 5%e0
Outcome
cost benefit ratioe0
Direction
followed bye0
Value
1:4.81e0
Qualifier
1:2.82e0
Comparator
control plote0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Among all treatments studied, the best and most economical treatment was Emamectin benzoate 5SG (1:5.60), Flubendiamide 480 SC (1:5.44), Indoxacarb 14.5SC (1:5.33), Lambda cyhalothrin 5% EC (1:5.08) followed by Neem oil 3% (1:4.89), NSKE 5% (1:4.81) and the least cost benefit ratio was observed in Karanj oil 2% (1:4.66) when compared to control plot (1:2.82).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 883–1244 · show in text ↑
t0

“Okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 121–125 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Karanj oil 2% had cost benefit ratio 1:4.66

Treatment
Karanj oil 2%e0
Outcome
cost benefit ratioe0
Direction
leaste0
Value
1:4.66e0
Qualifier
1:2.82e0
Comparator
control plote0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Among all treatments studied, the best and most economical treatment was Emamectin benzoate 5SG (1:5.60), Flubendiamide 480 SC (1:5.44), Indoxacarb 14.5SC (1:5.33), Lambda cyhalothrin 5% EC (1:5.08) followed by Neem oil 3% (1:4.89), NSKE 5% (1:4.81) and the least cost benefit ratio was observed in Karanj oil 2% (1:4.66) when compared to control plot (1:2.82).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 883–1244 · show in text ↑
t0

“Okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 121–125 · show in text ↑

lambda-cyhalothrin · yield · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

lambda-cyhalothrin · Earias vittella · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

indoxacarb · yield · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

flubendiamide · yield · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree

8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

flubendiamide · Earias vittella · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree

10 papers: 10 positive, 0 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

indoxacarb · Earias vittella · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree

10 papers: 10 positive, 0 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

emamectin benzoate · yield · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree

17 papers: 17 positive, 0 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

emamectin benzoate · Earias vittella · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree

21 papers: 21 positive, 0 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

8 of 10 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.