Paper · 2011 · American Journal of Agricultural and Biological Sciences

Biocontrol of Soil Fungi in Tomato with Microencapsulates Containing Bacillus subtilis

Suárez

4
claims
7
verbatim quotes
23
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Problem statement: An option to reduce pollution by synthetic agro-chemical in root plant disease management is the use of antagonist rhizobacteria belonging to Bacillus genus, because their inhibitory properties, stimulation of plant growth and crop yield increase. Approach: This study was carried out in order to evaluate if Bacillus subtilis strains could play an antagonists role of plant pathogens and if they can be microencapsulated inside a biopolymer matrix. It was adapted an equipment and evaluated a technique for microcapsules elaboration, in order to incorporate B. subtilis strains and to analyze their potential as biocontrol agents by determining their antagonistic effect against pathogenic soil fungi; in addition, it was analyzed their effect on tomato plant growth promotion under greenhouse conditions. B. subtilis strains identified as B1, J1, M2 and their mixture were used; microcapsules containing bacterial strains were inoculated to tomato seeds cv. Floradade. When seedlings emerged, a second application of microcapsules containing B. subtilis was performed on the pots, which previously were inoculated with the fungi Rhizoctonia solani and Fusarium oxysporum. Response variables were: Incidence and disease severity, plant growth, aerial and root dry weight, leaf area and fruit yield. Results: The outcome showed that the equipment designed and adapted for microcapsules elaboration was useful to obtain microcapsules containing the bacterial strains. B. subtilis strains exerted apparent biocontrol, since incidence and disease severity was reduced and for that reason inhibited the infective activity of the inoculated plant pathogens, also microcapsules containing Bacillus strains stimulated tomato growth and fruit yield. Conclusion: Microcapsules containing B. subtilis strains could be effective biocontrol agents against soil fungi plant pathogens and could have a potential biofertilizer effect, since they stimulated growth and yield of tomato plants compared to control.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The adapted equipment produced microcapsules containing the bacterial strains.

Outcome
microcapsules containing the bacterial strainse0

Not reportedComparatorValue

Verbatim

e0

“the equipment designed and adapted for microcapsules elaboration was useful to obtain microcapsules containing the bacterial strains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1352–1484 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

B. subtilis strains reduced incidence and severity of soil fungal disease in tomato.

Treatment
B. subtilis strainse0
Interactor
Rhizoctonia solaniRhizoctonia solanie1pathogen
Second interactor
B. subtilisBacillus subtilise0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
incidence and disease severitye0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizoctonia solani
Rhizoctonia solani · Interactoranonimowy, niektóre prawa zastrzeżone (CC BY) · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗
Bacillus subtilis
Bacillus subtilis · Second interactorY tambe (original uploader) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–34 · show in text ↑
e0

“B. subtilis strains exerted apparent biocontrol, since incidence and disease severity was reduced”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1486–1583 · show in text ↑
e1

“Rhizoctonia solani and Fusarium oxysporum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1150–1191 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Microcapsules containing Bacillus strains stimulated tomato growth.

Treatment
microcapsules containing Bacillus strainse0
Interactor
Bacilluse0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
tomato growthe0
Direction
stimulatede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“microcapsules containing Bacillus strains stimulated tomato growth and fruit yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1677–1759 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Microcapsules containing Bacillus strains stimulated tomato fruit yield compared with control.

Treatment
microcapsules containing Bacillus strainse0
Interactor
Bacilluse0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
fruit yielde0
Direction
stimulatede0
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“microcapsules containing Bacillus strains stimulated tomato growth and fruit yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1677–1759 · show in text ↑
e1

“growth and yield of tomato plants compared to control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1961–2014 · show in text ↑

Bacillus subtilis · Rhizoctonia solani · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.