Paper · 1988 · Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science

Tomato Production and Weed Control in Notillage Versus Conventional Tillage

Paulus P. Shelby; David L. Coffey; G. Neil Rhodes; et al.

9
claims
17
verbatim quotes
9
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Abstract Field studies were conducted in 1983 and 1984 to evaluate the feasibility of growing fresh-market tomatoes ( Lycopersicon esculentum Mill. ‘Floradade’) in no-tillage or conventional tillage systems and to evaluate the efficacy of postemergence herbicides under both tillage systems. In 1983, marketable fruit yields in no-tillage were nearly twice those from conventional tillage. In 1984, there were no statistical differences in marketable yields among herbicide treatments or between tillage systems. Yields were higher in 1984 than in 1983, largely due to more favorable growing conditions. In both years, metribuzin provided good broadleaf weed control. In 1983, annual grasses were better controlled in no-tillage with a sequential metribuzin application for fluazifop following metribuzin than with a single metribuzin application. Marketable yields were highest in plots where annual grasses were adequately controlled. Sequential metribuzin applications provided good broadleaf weed control and postemergence grass herbicides each provided excellent annual grass control in 1984. Chemical names used: (±)-2-[4-[[5-(trifluoromethyl)-2-pyridinyl]oxy]phenoxy]propanoic acid (fluazifop); 4-amino-6-(1,1-diemthylethyl)-3-(methyIthio)-1,2,4-triazin-5(4 H )-one (metribuzin).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In 1983, marketable fruit yield under no tillage was nearly double conventional tillage.

Taxon
fruite0
Treatment
no-tillagee0
Outcome
marketable fruit yieldse0
Direction
nearly twicee0
Comparator
conventional tillagee0

Verbatim

e0

“marketable fruit yields in no-tillage were nearly twice those from conventional tillage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 301–388 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

In 1984, marketable yields did not differ statistically among herbicide treatments.

Treatment
herbicide treatmentse0
Outcome
marketable yieldse0
Direction
no statistical differencese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–6 · show in text ↑
e0

“In 1984, there were no statistical differences in marketable yields among herbicide treatments or between tillage systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 390–511 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

In 1984, marketable yields did not differ statistically between tillage systems.

Treatment
tillage systemse0
Outcome
marketable yieldse0
Direction
no statistical differencese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–6 · show in text ↑
e0

“In 1984, there were no statistical differences in marketable yields among herbicide treatments or between tillage systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 390–511 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Marketable yields were higher in 1984 than 1983.

Outcome
Yieldse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
1983e0

Not reportedSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–6 · show in text ↑
e0

“Yields were higher in 1984 than in 1983, largely due to more favorable growing conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 513–602 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Metribuzin controlled broadleaf weeds well in both years.

Treatment
metribuzine0
Interactor
broadleaf weede0weed
Outcome
broadleaf weed controle0
Qualifier
In both yearse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–6 · show in text ↑
e0

“In both years, metribuzin provided good broadleaf weed control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 604–666 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In 1983, sequential metribuzin in no tillage controlled annual grasses better than a single application.

Treatment
sequential metribuzin applicatione0
Interactor
annual grassese0weed
Outcome
annual grasses were better controllede0
Direction
better controllede0
Qualifier
In 1983e0
Comparator
single metribuzin applicatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–6 · show in text ↑
e0

“In 1983, annual grasses were better controlled in no-tillage with a sequential metribuzin application for fluazifop following metribuzin than with a single metribuzin application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 668–846 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Marketable yield was highest where annual grasses were adequately controlled.

Interactor
annual grassese0weed
Outcome
Marketable yieldse0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–6 · show in text ↑
e0

“Marketable yields were highest in plots where annual grasses were adequately controlled”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 848–935 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sequential metribuzin gave good broadleaf weed control in 1984.

Treatment
Sequential metribuzin applicationse0
Interactor
broadleaf weede0weed
Outcome
broadleaf weed controle0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–6 · show in text ↑
e0

“Sequential metribuzin applications provided good broadleaf weed control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 937–1008 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Postemergence grass herbicides gave excellent annual grass control in 1984.

Treatment
postemergence grass herbicidese0
Interactor
annual grasse0weed
Outcome
annual grass controle0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–6 · show in text ↑
e0

“postemergence grass herbicides each provided excellent annual grass control in 1984”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1013–1096 · show in text ↑

metribuzin · control · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

metribuzin · weed · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 9 positive, 1 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

tillage · quality: postharvest · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 2 positive, 3 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

herbicide · quality: postharvest · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 3 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

herbicide · control · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.